COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DATO SRI MOHD NAJIB HJ ABD RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
Introduction
[1] The appellant, a former Prime Minister of Malaysia, was charged with and convicted of seven separate offences by the High Court in Malaya at Kuala Lumpur. The appellant was sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and fine.
[2] Aggrieved by that decision, the appellant appealed against both conviction and sentence in respect of all seven charges.
The Background Facts
[3] The charges against the appellant were preferred under three different statutes, namely:
1(i) A charge under s 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 [Act 694] ("the MACC Act");
Charge 1
"Bahawa kamu antara 17 Ogos 2011 dan 8 Februari 2012, di Pejabat Perdana Menteri, Presint 1, Putrajaya, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, sebagai seorang pegawai badan awam, iaitu Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan Malaysia, telah menggunakan jawatan untuk suapan bagi diri kamu berjumlah empat puluh dua juta Ringgit Malaysia (RM42,000,000.00) apabila kamu telah terlibat dalam keputusan bagi pihak Kerajaan Malaysia untuk memberikan jaminan kerajaan bagi pinjaman-pinjaman berjumlah empat bilion Ringgit Malaysia (RM4,0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.