To download the court judgment, you should follow these steps: Identify the official court or legal repository where the judgment is published. Usually, judgments are available on the official website of the court that issued the decision or on legal databases that host court rulings. Search for the judgment using the case details such as the case name, case number, or the date of judgment. In this instance, the case is a civil appeal decided on 6 May 2019, with the case title involving Dr Mansur Hussain & ORS versus Barisan Tenaga Perancang (M) Sdn Bhd & ORS. Use the case citation or details provided in the document to locate the judgment. The citation provided is "2019 MarsdenLR 677," which can be used as a reference in the search. Once located on the appropriate platform, look for a download option, typically available as a PDF or similar document format. If the judgment is not publicly available online, you may contact the court registry or the legal library associated with the court for assistance in obtaining a copy. Alternatively, if your firm has access to legal research databases or subscription services, search for the case within those platforms to download the judgment directly. Please ensure you have the necessary permissions or subscriptions to access the judgment through these platforms.

DR MANSUR HUSSAIN & ORS vs BARISAN TENAGA PERANCANG (M) SDN BHD & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 MarsdenLR 677

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DR MANSUR HUSSAIN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
BARISAN TENAGA PERANCANG (M) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Malik Imtiaz Sarwar,Ravi Nekoo,Chan Wei June,Ganesh Magenthiran,Priscilla Chin ,Respondent Advocate: Fiona Bodipalar,Thiva Kumaran

Judgement Key Points

To download the court judgment, you should follow these steps:

Identify the official court or legal repository where the judgment is published. Usually, judgments are available on the official website of the court that issued the decision or on legal databases that host court rulings.
Search for the judgment using the case details such as the case name, case number, or the date of judgment. In this instance, the case is a civil appeal decided on 6 May 2019, with the case title involving Dr Mansur Hussain & ORS versus Barisan Tenaga Perancang (M) Sdn Bhd & ORS.
Use the case citation or details provided in the document to locate the judgment. The citation provided is "2019 MarsdenLR 677," which can be used as a reference in the search.
Once located on the appropriate platform, look for a download option, typically available as a PDF or similar document format.
If the judgment is not publicly available online, you may contact the court registry or the legal library associated with the court for assistance in obtaining a copy.
Alternatively, if your firm has access to legal research databases or subscription services, search for the case within those platforms to download the judgment directly.

Please ensure you have the necessary permissions or subscriptions to access the judgment through these platforms.

Datuk Chai's Case

[19] Datuk Kenny Ng Bee Ken ("Datuk Kenny Ng") was the advocate and solicitor who prepared the 1st SSA and the OA on the instruction of Datuk Chai. MBSB was represented by Dr Mansur and MBSB's solicitor is Encik Shaik from Messrs Shaik Mohamed & Co. Dr Mansur consulted Encik Shaik during the related negotiations. Encik Shaik was present at the negotiations in respect of 1st SSA and the OA. Dr Mansur signed both agreements as witnessed by Encik Shaik.

[20] Datuk Chai's solicitor, Datuk Kenny Ng who is a partner in Messrs Azri, Lee Swee Seng & Co ("Messrs ALSS") denied that the 1st SSA and the OA were sham agreements to disguise an illegal moneylending transaction. Encik Hazim did not exercise the option to purchase BTP's shares under the OA.

[21] Datuk Chai testified that he is an investor and entrepreneur. He is the Group Managing Director of two listed companies. Datuk Chai contended that he was never been involved in moneylending business. Datuk Chai was the chairman of LCLSB which provided mechanical and electrical services to the Project. Datuk Chai was introduced by Mr Tan, one of LCLSB's directors.

[22] Datuk Chai met Dr Mansur who informed him about the Project

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 MarsdenLR 677

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYADR MANSUR HUSSAIN & ORS – AppellantVersusBARISAN TENAGA PERANCANG (M) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DR MANSUR HUSSAIN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
BARISAN TENAGA PERANCANG (M) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent