COURT APPEAL MALAYA
MUHAMAD RIDHA BAHARUDIN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
[1] The appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under s 39B of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952 ( DDA 1952). There is also a cross-appeal on the sentence by the Deputy Public Prosecutor and the main issues are as follows:
(a) It is not in dispute that only SP 4 (Kpl. Faizal) who was in the team which led to the arrest, gave evidence;
(b) SP4's version was that he saw the accused sitting on a motorbike with a sling bag and he threw the sling bag and later the bag was found to have the drugs;
(c) the defendant's version was that he was not in the scene at all or with the alleged motorbike;
(d) no photographs of the scene or the motorbike, etc. were produced;
(e) finger prints evidence against the accused was negative;
(f) during the cross-examination, SP4 maintained that there was only one arrest and refused to answer the cross-examination questions in respect of another arrest and seizure of drug from another person where there was a police report and marked as Exhibit D15;
(g) SP4 only gave reasons during re-examination which the learned counsel says in essence it is abhorrent to notion of justice and fair play
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.