SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 939

COURT APPEAL MALAYA
MUHAMAD RIDHA BAHARUDIN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Haijan Omar,Ravin Jay ,Respondent Advocate: Muhammad Azmi Mashud

JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JCA (Majority):

[1] The appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under s 39B of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952 ( DDA 1952). There is also a cross-appeal on the sentence by the Deputy Public Prosecutor and the main issues are as follows:

(a) It is not in dispute that only SP 4 (Kpl. Faizal) who was in the team which led to the arrest, gave evidence;

(b) SP4's version was that he saw the accused sitting on a motorbike with a sling bag and he threw the sling bag and later the bag was found to have the drugs;

(c) the defendant's version was that he was not in the scene at all or with the alleged motorbike;

(d) no photographs of the scene or the motorbike, etc. were produced;

(e) finger prints evidence against the accused was negative;

(f) during the cross-examination, SP4 maintained that there was only one arrest and refused to answer the cross-examination questions in respect of another arrest and seizure of drug from another person where there was a police report and marked as Exhibit D15;

(g) SP4 only gave reasons during re-examination which the learned counsel says in essence it is abhorrent to notion of justice and fair play


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top