SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 87

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LIFOMAX WOODBUILD SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
NG YEE TECK – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the procedure for appeal and its allowance based on merits. (Para 1)

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the learned High Court Judge given on 29 April 2016 allowing the respondent's application to strike out the writ and statement of claim pursuant to O 18 r 19(1)(a), and/or (b), and/or (d) of the Rules of 2012. We heard the appeal on 18 October 2016 and after due deliberation and considering the submissions of counsel, we allowed the appeal with costs. We found that there are merits in the appeal and ordered that the matter be remitted to the High Court for full trial. These are our reasons.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top