[1] There are two related appeals before us, namely:

(i) W-02(NCVC)(W)-138-2018 (Appeal 138); and

(ii) W-02(NCVC)(W)-151-2018 (Appeal 151).

Both appeals 138 and 151 arose from one suit in the High Court, which is Civil Suit 22 NCVC-756-11-2016. In this judgment, parties will be referred to, as they were in the High Court.

[2] Appeal 138 is the appeal by the 1st defendant (D1) whilst Appeal 151 is the appeal by the 2nd defendant (D2). Both defendants appeal against the whole of the High Court's decision which allowed the plaintiff's claim, after full trial, namely:

(a) A declaration that the 40 sale and purchase agreements between D2 and D1 dated 7 December 2005 only insofar as the sale of the said 394 accessory parcels by D2 to D1 and any further transfers (if any) are invalid and unenforceable;

(b) An order that the Registrar of Land Titles Selangor and/or the Director General of Land and Mines Selangor and/or the Land Administrator and/or the authority concerned to cancel the entry of the said 394 accessory parcels from t