TERAS KIMIA SDN BHD vs KERAJAAN MALAYSIA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2013 MarsdenLR 1404

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TERAS KIMIA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Respondent

Table of Content
1. introduction and basis of the plaintiff's claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. continuance of services post contract expiration. (Para 4 , 5 , 8)
3. dispute over payment understanding. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
4. issues at stake regarding service provision. (Para 11 , 16 , 17)
5. evidence documenting services performed. (Para 29 , 30)
6. court's findings on contract subsistence. (Para 61 , 62 , 65)
7. alternative claim for quantum meruit. (Para 88 , 89)
8. final relief and orders granted by the court. (Para 99 , 100)

[1] The plaintiff is a company which was, at all material times, a licensee for technology relating to a specialised fuel marker known as the NanoTag, which is used, inter alia, for the marking of subsidised diesel for the purposes of carrying out inspections to detect cases of abuse of subsidised diesel. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant, the Government of Malaysia, is premised on breach of contract, or alternatively for work done on a quantum meruit basis, for which it claims it remains unpaid.

[2] The background relating to the dispute arose as follows. On 21 September 2006 the plaintiff and the Government of Malaysia entered into an agreement ('the original agre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2013 MarsdenLR 1404

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURTERAS KIMIA SDN BHD – AppellantVersusKERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TERAS KIMIA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Respondent