SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 2937

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
TAN JING JEONG – Appellant
Versus
ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE MALAYSIA BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Abang Iskandar J:

[1] At the end of 2004, Mr Tan Jing Jeong ('TJJ') had bought an insurance policy from the Allianz Life Insurance Malaysia Berhad ('the defendant insurance company'-D1), through one of its agents by the name of Mr Ong Tuan Soon (OTS-D2). The insurance product was a Life Policy known as the 'Investpro'. It was undisputed that, among others, the terms of the Investro policy had included the following:

(a) the premium of the policy was RM400,000 per annum;

(b) that the life insurance coverage was RM8 million;

(c) the total and permanent disability coverage was RM1 million;

(d) that the monthly service charges was RM3; and

(e) the fund management charge was 1.5% p.a.

[2] This product was in the nature of an investment-linked insurance policy and as such a certain portion of the premium was allocated for investment-linked fund for the purpose of yielding returns from the investment. In fact, it was provided that 45% of the premium of RM400,000 which had translated to RM180,000, was earmarked for that very purpose.

[3] TJJ had paid the first year premium for this Investpro insurance product in full and he had expected a reasonable return from his investment in the Investpro poli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top