SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2973

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
NURUL IZZAH ANWAR & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legality and procedure of the local enquiry. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. grounds for judicial review articulated by respondents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments regarding standing and public interest. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. legal representation issues in electoral inquiries. (Para 19 , 20)
5. final decision on the appeal regarding the local enquiry's legality. (Para 22)

[1] Before turning to the issues central to this appeal, we shall refer to a notice under s 4 of the Thirteenth Schedule to the Federal Constitution published vide Gazette Notification PU(B) 410/2016 on 15 September 2016 (the Notice) as a convenient starting point in our judgment. Pursuant to the Notice, the Election Commission (the EC) has notified that it has reviewed the division of the States of Malaya into Federal and State constituencies in accordance with art 113, cl (2) of the and proposed provisional recommendations consequent to the said review (the proposed recommendations). Eligible parties are also apprised to the effect that they can make representations objecting to the proposed recommendations in accordance with s 5 of the said Thirteenth Schedule. Following the publication of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top