SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1192

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DREAM PROPERTY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ATLAS HOUSING SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the appeal arises from a contractual dispute regarding breach and unjust enrichment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the case revolves around a sale agreement for land and the consequences of its breach. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
3. vacant possession and the interpretation of contractual terms are crucial to determining breach. (Para 57 , 58)
4. optimal outcomes from unjust enrichment shall ensure neither party receives unjust benefits. (Para 100 , 101)
Azahar Mohamed FCJ:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal from the whole of the majority judgment of the Court of Appeal that upheld the judgment of the High Court after a full trial of the matter that arose out of a contractual dispute. This appeal also raises the important question of restitutionary remedy and the law of unjust enrichment, originally also called the law of restitution.

[2] We will describe the parties in this judgment as they appear in the High Court, namely the appellant as the defendant and the respondent as the plaintiff.

[3] The subject matter of the dispute between the parties revolved around the termination of a sale and purchase agreement for a parcel of land ("the land"), where the registered proprietor Atlas Housing Sdn B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top