MARZIDA MANSOR vs LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 919

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MARZIDA MANSOR – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:T Gunaseelan,Keshvinjeet Singh Sidhu ,Respondent Advocate: Balqis Mohamad Shahril

Table of Content
1. exploration of the appellant's arguments against the bankruptcy notice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. context of the 13 years old summary judgment related to epf contributions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. outline of arguments and grounds presented by the appellant. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. emphasis on the epf act's precedence over summary judgments. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 22)
5. clarification on legality of late payment charges and interest. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
6. final ruling based on established legal principles and merits. (Para 56)

Azimah Omar JCA

A. Introduction

[1] The Appeal before this Court is an appeal by a thirteen (13) years Judgment Debtor (the Appellant) insisting to look beyond a Bankruptcy Notice (in hopes of impugning the validity of a 13 years old Summary Judgment on the ground of nullity by uncertainty).

[2] It is pertinent to note that to date (save for the Appellant's challenge against the Respondent's present bankruptcy action), the Appellant has neither moved any application to set aside, vary, nor appealed against the entry of the 13 years old Summary Judgment.

[3] The factum of delay is sorely obvious and undisputable. Nonetheless, the Appellant beckon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 919

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAMARZIDA MANSOR – AppellantVersusLEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MARZIDA MANSOR – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Respondent