SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 1300

INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
AZMI & COMPANY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
FIRDAUS MUSA – Respondent


The Law

The function of the Industrial Court (the Court) in reference under s. 20 of the Act has been stated by the Federal Court in the of case of Goon Kwee Phoy v. J & P Coats (M) Sdn. Bhd. 1981 MarsdenLR 117 , where at p. 136, Raja Azlan CJ elaborated as follows:

... where representations are made and are referred to the Industrial Court for enquiry, it is the duty of the Court to determine whether the termination or dismissal is with or without just cause or excuse. If the employer chooses to give a reason for the action taken by him, the duty of the Industrial Court will be to enquire whether that reason has or has not been made out. If it finds as a fact that it has not been proven then the inevitable conclusion must be that the termination or dismissal was with or without just cause or excuse.

The proper enquiry of the Court is the reason advanced by the employer and that Court or the High Court cannot go into another reason not relied upon by the employer or find one for him.

It is a basic principle of industrial relations jurisprudence that in a dismissal case the employer must produce convincing and cogent evidence that the employee had been incapable of performing his duties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top