SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon

Enforcement Directorate

ED's Case Against Kejriwal Based on Hearsay, Alleges Senior Advocate Singhvi in Supreme Court

2024-05-01

Subject: Legal - Criminal Law

AI Assistant icon
ED's Case Against Kejriwal Based on Hearsay, Alleges Senior Advocate Singhvi in Supreme Court

Supreme Today News Desk

ED's Case Against Kejriwal Based on Hearsay, Alleges Senior Advocate Singhvi in Supreme Court

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the entire case made out against him by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), for his alleged involvement in the Delhi excise policy case, is based on "hearsay".

Appearing on behalf of Kejriwal , senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi alleged that the federal agency deliberately "suppressed" statements of accused-turned-approvers wherein they had not said anything incriminatory against Kejriwal .

Accusing the ED of selectively using "incriminatory" statements of approvers to falsely implicate his client, Singhvi argued that the prosecution has been completely unfair.

A division bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta posted Kejriwal 's plea, challenging his arrest by ED and seeking immediate release, for resumed hearing on Friday. The counsel for ED will present his counter arguments on Friday.

The bench told the ED counsel to answer (on Friday) certain queries, including the timing of Kejriwal 's arrest. Kejriwal has alleged that he has been arrested by the federal agency at the cusp of the Lok Sabha elections only due to a political witch-hunt.

Referring to another claim by Kejriwal , the SC asked the ED counsel to explain on Friday the time gap between initiation of proceedings and action of his arrest.

The bench further asked the ED counsel to demonstrate the alleged involvement of Kejriwal especially in wake of no attachment of proceeds of crime in the case so far.

On Monday, the bench had verbally questioned Singhvi , counsel for Kejriwal "just out of curiosity, why did you not move application for bail?"

In response, Singhvi had said that " Kejriwal 's arrest is illegal". Singhvi argued that ED's "power to arrest is not an obligation to arrest". He went on to argue that Kejriwal was not even arrayed as an accused or suspect in the charge sheets filed by the CBI and ED until the day of his arrest.

Keywords:

  • Delhi excise policy case
  • Enforcement Directorate (ED)
  • Arvind Kejriwal
  • Hearsay
  • Abhishek Manu Singhvi
  • Supreme Court
  • Political witch-hunt
  • Money laundering
  • Proceeds of crime
  • Bail
  • Arrest
  • Accused
  • Suspect
  • Charge sheet
  • CBI

#ArvindKejriwal #EnforcementDirectorate #DelhiExcisePolicyCase

Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top