Enforcement Directorate
2024-05-01
Subject: Legal - Criminal Law
ED's Case Against
New Delhi:
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind
Appearing on behalf of
Accusing the ED of selectively using "incriminatory" statements of approvers to falsely implicate his client,
A division bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta posted
The bench told the ED counsel to answer (on Friday) certain queries, including the timing of
Referring to another claim by
The bench further asked the ED counsel to demonstrate the alleged involvement of
On Monday, the bench had verbally questioned
In response,
Keywords:
#ArvindKejriwal #EnforcementDirectorate #DelhiExcisePolicyCase
Court Rejects Selective Arbitration Under Section 21
12 Feb 2026
Family Judge Exposes Weaponized Litigation in Custody Dispute
14 Feb 2026
Centre Notifies Two High Court Chief Justice Appointments
16 Feb 2026
Deep Chandra Joshi Appointed Acting NCLT President
16 Feb 2026
Debunking the Myth That Indians Lack Privacy Concepts
16 Feb 2026
Whose View Is It Anyway? Juniors Uncredited
16 Feb 2026
Private Property Disputes Not Human Rights Violations; HRC Lacks Jurisdiction Under PHRA: Gujarat HC
16 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Stay on RTI Data Amendments
16 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance of Section 4 Shariat Act Bars Muslim Declarations Under Section 3: Supreme Court Impleads Centre, UP
16 Feb 2026
The seriousness of the allegations and the active participation of the accused in the criminal conspiracy were key factors in the court's decision to dismiss the bail application.
The seriousness of the charges, the involvement of the accused in the conspiracy, and the lack of grounds for bail at the current stage were central legal principles established in the judgment.
The seriousness of the allegations and the nature of the offense, including criminal conspiracy and extortion, influenced the court's decision to dismiss the bail application.
The seriousness of the allegations and the stage of the trial are important factors in determining whether bail should be granted in cases involving criminal conspiracy and extortion.
SECTION 3 OF PMLA HAS A WIDER REACH AND ANYBODY WHO IS ACTUALLY INVOLVED IN KNOWINGLY ASSISTING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY PROCESS OR ACTIVITY WITH THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME INCLUDING ASSISTING IN THE....
The court emphasized that for bail under PMLA, satisfaction of twin conditions is mandatory, confirming the need for reasonable grounds against guilt and potential for re-offense. Balancing the sever....
The court emphasized the importance of witness credibility and procedural adherence in upholding a conviction under the Abkari Act.
Compliance with statutory requirements during arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act ensures protection of fundamental rights.
The court upheld the legality of the petitioner's arrest under the PMLA, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with statutory safeguards and the scope of judicial review.
(1) Bail jurisprudence is a facet of a civilised criminal justice system. An accused is innocent until proven guilty by a competent court following the due process.
(2) Delhi Liquor scam – Power t....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.