Bail Cancellation Plea
Subject : Criminal Law - Money Laundering
Chief Minister
Opposing ED's plea against the grant of bail, the Chief Minister in his reply has said that ED uses illegal measures of "pressurizing" other co-accused in the case and inducing them to make incriminating statements in lieu of "no-objection" by the prosecution to the grant of bail to them.
Refuting ED's allegation that the trial court did not give it a fair opportunity to address arguments,
The Chief Minister has said that all the submissions made by ED are not only untenable in law but also reflect their "apathy, insensitivity and overbearing as well as over- reaching attitude" towards Courts of law.
"There exists no proof or material demonstrating that the AAP received funds or advanced kickbacks from the South group, let alone utilizing them in the Goa election campaign. Not a single rupee was traced back to the AAP, and the allegations put forth in this regard are devoid of any tangible evidence, rendering them vague, baseless without any corroboration," the reply states.
The matter was listed today for hearing. However, Justice
Neena Bansal Krishna
adjourned hearing to July 15 as ED requested time to file its counter affidavit to
Bail cancellation - Money laundering case - Alleged liquor policy scam - Witch-hunt - Miscarriage of justice - Pressurizing co-accused - Incriminating statements - Lack of evidence - Goa election campaign
#LegalBattle #PoliticalCorruption #EnforcementDirectorate
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.