Back
Epic Games vs. Apple Lawsuit
Subject : Technology - Antitrust
After more than three years of legal battles, the Epic Games vs. Apple lawsuit has finally come to an end. The US Supreme Court declined to hear the "Fortnite" maker's appeal, effectively ending the long-running legal dispute. The case centered around Epic Games' attempt to circumvent Apple's 30% App Store commission by implementing direct payments for "Fortnite" in 2020. Apple responded by removing the game from its App Store, leading to a series of legal challenges. Despite Epic Games' efforts, the company has largely lost at every step of the legal process, although Apple did not always emerge victorious. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the appeal means that the lower court's rulings, which included a requirement for Apple to alter its App Store practices to avoid anti-steering, will stand. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney expressed disappointment with the outcome, stating that the company's goal was to promote a free market where competition is based on merit. Apple, on the other hand, maintained that Epic Games chose to break the App Store agreements it had signed. The App Store has faced regulatory pressure in recent years due to concerns over Apple's monopolistic power in the iPhone software ecosystem. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the future of app stores and digital marketplaces.
Antitrust lawsuit - App Store commission - Direct payments - Anti-steering - Free market - Monopolistic power
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
