An executive magistrate court in Delhi on Sunday ordered the release of Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) leaders Abhijeet Dipke, Saurav Das, and Ashutosh Ranka from preventive detention, on the condition that they furnish a ₹50,000 surety bond and maintain peace for one year. The trio had been detained by Delhi Police on October 10, shortly after their flight from Mumbai landed at Indira Gandhi International Airport, ahead of a planned protest at Jantar Mantar against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanes kumar.

The release was ordered by the Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate (SEM) Court at Delhi Cantoment. The court directed the leaders to execute a bond under Section 126 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which empowers an executive magistrate to require a person likely to breach the peace to execute a bond for keeping the peace for up to one year. Additionally, the police had invoked Section 170 BNSS, which allows a police officer to arrest without warrant a person designed to commit a cognizable offense if the arrest is necessary to prevent it.

Police stated that the preventive arrest followed due legal procedure and that the leaders were produced before the SEM Court on Sunday. The detentions were part of a large-scale clampdown in the national capital, where over 7,000 protesters, including opposition leaders and YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, were detained. Several opposition cos—including former chief ministers—were also taken into custody while attempting to join the protest.

After their release, Das told reporters: “They picked us up as if we were criminals … They took our phones forcibly.” Ranka accused the government of creating a “war-like situation” by deploying tens of thousands of troops and said the clmpdown had “damaged the image of our country.” CJP legal affairs head Ratna Singh confirmed the release and called it a “major legal victory.”

Legal Implications of the Peace Bond

The bond under Section 126 BNSS binds the leaders to maintain good behavior for one year, but CJP clarified that it does not bar peaceful protest. “No CJP leader has signed any bond that says they will not protest any more. The bond refers to refraining from breach of peace. But participating in a peaceful protest is a Constitutional right and does not breach peace,” the party stated on X. The court’s order effectively allows the leaders to continue their agitational activities so long as they do not disturb public tranquility.

The release came amid a broader legal challenge to the mass detentions. The Supreme Court of India agreed to hold a special sitting on Monday to hear petitions challenging the indiscriminate detentions and the security clampdown that inclded restrictions on public transport and metro services.

Ultimatum to Police for Next Protest

On Monday, Das and Ranka went to the Parlament Street police station and gave Delhi Police a 24-hour ultimatum to provide a date for the next protest at Jantar Mantar. “Police tells everyone to approach them 10 days in advance. We are now saying that they have the choice to tell us the date and time. We are giving them a 24-hour ultimatum,” Das told reporters. Ranka added that if the police did not respond, the party would announce its own protest call within that timeframe.

The CJP has renewed its demand for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanes Kumar over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. The party said its protests will continue across the country until the demand is met. Meanwhile, the opposition INDIA bloc led by Rahul Gandhi planned a march to the Supreme Court on Monday afternoon over the same issue, adding to the tense atmosphere in the capital.

What’s Next

The executive magistrate court’s release order marks a procedural victory for the CJP, but the legal battle over the scope of preventive detention under BNSS continues. The Supreme Court’s special hearing on the mass detentions could have far-reaching implications for the rights to peaceful assembly and protest. For now, the ball is in Delhi Police’s court: they have 24 hours to respond to the CJP’s request for a protest date, else the party will set its own schedule, potentially reigniting confrontations.