Former Supreme Court Judge Justice A.R. Dave Appointed President of NFSU's IDDRC

The National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU) marked a significant milestone in the evolution of digital dispute resolution in India on 23 August 2026, when the first meeting of the Board of Governors of its International Digital Dispute Resolution Centre (IDDRC) was held at the Gandhinagar campus. The Board unanimously appointed former Supreme Court judge Justice A.R. Dave as the President of IDDRC and declared the Centre operational as an institutional provider of arbitration and mediation services. This development positions IDDRC as a pioneering digital-first platform designed to integrate cutting-edge technology into the traditional dispute resolution framework.

Digital-First Arbitration Centre Officially Operational

IDDRC was originally inaugurated on 27 February 2026 by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, in the presence of Gujarat Deputy Chief Minister Harsh Sanghavi and Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal. However, the recent Board meeting formally breathed life into the Centre, transitioning it from a conceptual entity to a fully functional institution. The Centre has been conceived by NFSU’s Vice Chancellor, Padma Shri Dr J.M. Vyas, as a digital-first institution for arbitration and mediation, with its entire architecture designed around technology. According to the NFSU statement, IDDRC’s framework incorporates AI-enabled capabilities and blockchain-integrated systems, with confidentiality, data protection, traceability and auditability forming key elements of its institutional design.

Board of Governors and Leadership

The first Board of Governors meeting was attended by an impressive roster of legal luminaries: former Supreme Court judges Justice A.R. Dave, Justice M.R. Shah, and Justice Rajesh Bindal; former Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Sonia Gokani; former Gujarat High Court judge Justice P.P. Bhatt; and Senior Advocate Ratan Singh, who chairs the Society of Construction Law, India. The Board’s unanimous decision to appoint Justice A.R. Dave as President reflects the depth of judicial experience being brought to institutional arbitration. Justice Dave, who retired from the Supreme Court of India in 2019, is widely respected for his expertise in constitutional and commercial law. His leadership is expected to lend credibility and strategic direction to the Centre’s operations.

Technological Architecture: AI and Blockchain Integration

One of the most striking features of IDDRC is its technological backbone. Unlike traditional arbitration centres that rely on in-person hearings and paper-based records, IDDRC is designed to be fully digital. The use of AI-enabled capabilities allows for sophisticated case management, document analysis, and even predictive analytics to assist arbitrators in evaluating evidence. Blockchain integration ensures that every step of the dispute resolution process—from the filing of claims to the issuance of awards—is recorded on an immutable ledger, providing unparalleled traceability and auditability. This technological layer addresses long-standing concerns in arbitration about data security and confidentiality. For legal professionals, this means a shift towards a more transparent and efficient process, reducing the administrative burden and potential for human error.

The Centre’s institutional framework places a premium on confidentiality and data protection, which are often paramount in commercial disputes involving sensitive information. The combination of AI and blockchain creates a robust environment where parties can have confidence that their data is secure and that the integrity of the process is maintained. This aligns with global trends in online dispute resolution (ODR), which have gained significant traction in the wake of the pandemic.

Invitation to Domain Experts

With its operationalisation, IDDRC has issued an invitation for expressions of interest from eminent domain-expert arbitrators. The criteria emphasise professional credibility, relevant experience, and subject-matter expertise. This call is likely to attract a diverse pool of specialists, including retired judges, senior counsel, academics, and industry professionals with deep knowledge of fields such as construction law, intellectual property, international trade, and technology disputes. By focusing on domain expertise, IDDRC aims to offer parties access to arbitrators who not only understand the law but also the technical and commercial nuances of their disputes.

For legal practitioners, this presents an opportunity to expand their practice into a new digital ecosystem. Arbitrators who are proficient in using digital tools and comfortable with AI-assisted processes will be particularly valued. The Centre’s digital-first approach also implies that hearings can be conducted virtually, reducing costs and time associated with travel. This is a significant advantage for international disputes, where parties are often located in different jurisdictions.

Broader Implications for Dispute Resolution in India

The establishment of IDDRC is part of a larger movement towards institutionalising arbitration in India. While ad hoc arbitration remains prevalent, there has been a concerted push by the judiciary and the government to promote institutional arbitration as a reliable and efficient alternative to litigation. The NFSU, being an Institution of National Importance under the Ministry of Home Affairs, brings additional weight to this initiative. The Centre’s emphasis on technology also positions India as a competitive hub for international arbitration. With the rise of digital commerce and cross-border transactions, there is an increasing demand for dispute resolution mechanisms that are fast, secure, and cost-effective.

Moreover, the use of blockchain and AI could set a precedent for other arbitration institutions in India and abroad. By pioneering these technologies, IDDRC may influence how evidence is handled and how awards are enforced. The immutable nature of blockchain records could also help in resolving disputes over authenticity of documents, a common issue in cyber law cases. Legal professionals will need to stay abreast of these technological changes to effectively represent clients in the new environment.

Conclusion

The formal operationalisation of NFSU’s International Digital Dispute Resolution Centre under the presidency of former Supreme Court judge Justice A.R. Dave marks a watershed moment in the Indian alternative dispute resolution landscape. By combining blockchain-integrated systems with AI-enabled capabilities, IDDRC offers a model for the future of arbitration and mediation. The invitation for domain-expert arbitrators signals a commitment to quality and specialisation. For legal practitioners, this development underscores the importance of embracing technology to enhance the efficiency and credibility of dispute resolution. As IDDRC begins its operations, it will be closely watched by the legal community as a test case for digital-first institutional arbitration in India.