Back
Directs State To Decide On Of Haren Pandya Murder Within Six Months
The has issued a time-bound directive to the State of Gujarat to process the remission application of Mohammed Asgar Ali, one of the convicts in the 2003 of former state Home Minister Haren Pandya. Presiding over the matter, Justice M. R. Mengdey ordered that a final decision be reached as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months.
A Long Shadow: The The of Haren Pandya on , while he was on a morning walk near Law Garden in Ahmedabad, remains a landmark criminal case in India’s legal history. The investigation, which traversed multiple judicial tiers, saw a 12 individuals in . However, the later all of them in , citing a "botched" and "misdirected" investigation.
The narrative took a definitive turn in when the restored the and of the accused. The had alleged that the murder was a retaliatory act orchestrated to avenge the communal riots in Gujarat, involving a larger conspiracy to target prominent political and religious leaders.
The Current Application Mohammed Asgar Ali, currently serving a , had petitioned the High Court seeking a formal decision on his . The state’s prison records presented during the hearing indicated that the machinery for his potential release was already in motion.
Justice M. R. Mengdey noted that the procedural requirements were being fulfilled, stating:
"From the submitted on record it appears that the process for consideration of the petitioner's case for grant of remission is underway and the opinion from the has also been called for, which has been received and the same shall be put up before the concerned authority in the near future."
The Court’s Mandate While the court acknowledged the ongoing administrative process, it emphasized the prisoner's right to a timely determination of his plea. By setting a six-month deadline, the High Court has effectively mandated the state authorities to expedite the regarding the 's eligibility for remission.
The Court held:
"Having regard to these aspect, the concerned authority shall take an appropriate decision, in accordance with law, on the application submitted by the petitioner for grant of remission, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of the order."
With these directives issued, the High Court disposed of the , placing the onus back on the state government to finalize its internal review within the prescribed timeframe. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s role in ensuring that administrative delays do not infringe upon the processing of a ’s claims under the law.
