Back
Holds Filing Police Application in Does Not Amount to Defamation
Ahmedabad – In a judgment that clarifies the boundaries of , the has held that approaching the police with a complaint in does not constitute defamation under . Justice J.L. Odedra dismissed a petition by Vijaybhai Jeysingbhai Vasava, who sought to revive defamation proceedings against Rajeshbhai Ratilal Vasava over a land dispute in Narmada district.
The Dispute and the Alleged Defamation
The case stemmed from an application filed by respondent No.2 with the police concerning a parcel of land in Bandishervan village. The petitioner claimed that the application falsely accused him of grazing cattle on standing crops. Subsequently, a Facebook user named Vasava Champak posted the application and photographs on social media, and two Gujarati newspapers – Gujarat Samachar and Sandesh – carried reports about the incident. The petitioner alleged that respondent No.2 orchestrated these publications to defame him.
The petitioner filed a complaint under before the , but the magistrate dismissed it under . The magistrate noted that the original police application had not been produced, the newspaper items did not name the petitioner, and the truth of the allegations was a matter for investigation. The upheld that order, prompting the petitioner to move the High Court.
The High Court's Scrutiny
Justice Odedra observed that the petitioner had failed to place the alleged police application on record—neither before the magistrate nor during
.
"The very edifice, on which the petitioner claims that respondent No.2 has defamed, is missing,"
the Court remarked. The Facebook user who published the application was not impleaded as a party, and the newspaper reports did not identify the petitioner as the person responsible for the grazing.
The Court further examined the legal framework. provides that it is not defamation to make, in , an accusation to a person having over the subject matter. The police clearly have such authority to investigate criminal allegations.
Ruling and Implications
Dismissing the petition, Justice Odedra held that even if the police application existed, merely filing it would not amount to defamation because of the statutory exception.
"Merely because the person files an application to any of those, who have
over that person with respect to the subject matter of accusation, the same does not amount to defamation in terms of Exception 8,"
the Court stated.
The decision reinforces the principle that citizens can report suspected wrongdoing to law enforcement without fear of being prosecuted for defamation, as long as the complaint is made in . Legal commentators have welcomed the ruling for striking a balance between protecting reputation and preserving the freedom to approach authorities.
The petition was dismissed, and .
