SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Section 302 IPC, 376AB IPC, Section 6 POCSO, Sentencing Commutation

HC Commutes Death Sentence to 30 Years in Minor Rape-Murder Case - 2025-12-24

Subject : Criminal Law - POCSO and Sexual Assault

Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
HC Commutes Death Sentence to 30 Years in Minor Rape-Murder Case

Supreme Today News Desk

HC Commutes Death Sentence to 30 Years in Minor Rape-Murder Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has delivered a significant verdict, commuting the death sentence awarded to an employee of a tent-installer for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a five-year-old girl, referred to as ‘Laado’. The division bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara and Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur acquitted the convict’s mother, Kamla Devi, citing insufficient evidence regarding criminal conspiracy, while upholding the guilt of the primary accused, Virender @ Bholu.

A Brutal Crime and a Distraught Village

In the sweltering heat of May 2018, the small town of Palwal, Haryana, was devastated by the disappearance and subsequent gruesome murder of a five-year-old girl. She had accompanied the accused, who worked for her father, to his home, where she was brutally raped and murdered. Her remains were later discovered stuffed into a flour container in the accused's courtyard after villagers, led by the victim’s family, forcibly gained entry into the house despite initial resistance and an attempt by the accused’s mother to cut the electricity supply.

Arguments and Judicial Scrutiny

The prosecution relied primarily on circumstantial evidence: the 'last seen' doctrine, CCTV footage showing the accused gripping the victim's hand, and the discovery of the body at his residence. The Defense challenged the recovery of the weapon and the validity of the disclosure statements, highlighting discrepancies in the dates on police documents.

The High Court meticulously dismantled the prosecution’s reliance on controversial disclosure statements, noting, "the prosecution has failed to prove the disclosure statements Ext P6 and P7, beyond a reasonable doubt," partially due to questionable tampering of dates on police records. However, the bench ruled that the remaining chain of circumstantial evidence against Virender was "complete, unbroken, and leads to the sole inference of Virender’s guilt."

The "Raja Beta" Syndrome and Judicial Reform

In a pointed observation regarding the acquittal of Kamla Devi, the court reflected on the social dynamics of the region. Justice Chitkara noted: > "Unfortunately, in this part of India, family members, especially mothers, often have such blind love for their 'precious' sons that, no matter how imperfect or villainous they might be, they are still regarded as ‘Raja Betas.’ Kamla Devi... prioritized shielding her son instead of informing the police... although condemnable, her conduct cannot be punished under the Indian Penal Code."

The Verdict: Why Commute the Death Sentence?

While the crime was heinous, the court applied the 'rarest of rare' doctrine with a humanitarian lens. The judges observed that the murder appeared to be a desperate act of panic to destroy evidence of rape rather than a premeditated, calculated slaughter.

The Court ruled: > "Therefore, when two views are possible before this Court, to impose or not to impose death sentence, then the view for not awarding the capital punishment must be preferred over the other extreme irreversible sentence."

Accordingly, the court commuted the death sentence to rigorous imprisonment for life, stipulating a minimum 30-year term of actual incarceration without the benefit of remission. Additionally, the court imposed a compensation of Rs. 30,00,000 for the victim's family, ensuring the perpetrator remained incapacitated during the sunset of his strength, while avoiding the state-sanctioned finality of the gallows.

Implications for Future Cases

This judgment serves as a robust reminder that in cases of circumstantial evidence, the burden of proof under Section 106 of the Evidence Act shifts to the accused to provide a cogent explanation, but the Court's sentencing power remains guided by the constitutional promise of dignity, even for a criminal. The acquittal of the mother on the grounds of lack of intent to conspire, despite her obstructive behavior post-discovery, underscores the high standard of proof required in criminal conspiracy charges.

Capital Punishment - Circumstantial Evidence - Commutation - Rape-Murder - Minor Victim - Reformation

#HCVerdict #DeathPenalty

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top