Back
Rejects State Response On Loudspeaker Noise Limits Demanding Detailed Now
The at Indore has signaled a firm stance against the persistent issue of noise pollution, expressing deep dissatisfaction with the state government's lackluster response to regulating loudspeakers. During a hearing on , a division bench comprising Justice Subodh Abhyankar and Justice Alok Awasthi scrutinized representatives from the local administration and the pollution control board, mandating that verbal assurances must now be replaced by verified, detailed action.
An Ongoing Battle for Quiet
The proceedings stem from a filed by Indore resident Amitabh Upadhyay, who has raised concerns over the unregulated use of loudspeakers in religious spaces and public areas. Despite earlier court orders mandating that noise levels not exceed 10 decibels above ambient levels or 75 decibels—whichever is lower—the petitioner alleges that violations remain rampant at all hours, including late into the night.
The court's patience has worn thin after fifteen months of pending . The bench was visibly unimpressed by the presence of high-ranking police officials—ACP Ashish Patel and ACP A.S. Jadon—and Satish K. Chouksey of the , finding their explanations regarding on-ground enforcement insufficient.
The Call for Administrative Accountability
The core of the dispute lies not just in the frequency of violations, but in the lack of tangible administrative consequences for offenders. The directed the State to provide a comprehensive affidavit covering: * Specific actions taken against individuals responsible for noise pollution. * Proposed future measures to curb the menace effectively. * A detailed account of actions taken by the to comply with Section 18 of the .
Key Observations
The depth of the court's frustration was captured in its official recording:
"Although it is stated that appropriate actions are being taken against the persons responsible for causing pollution, however we are not satisfied with the answers given by the concerned persons."
The bench further emphasized the necessity of detailed documentation:
"We direct them to file appropriate reply along with the affidavit as to what action has been taken by them against the persons responsible for causing pollution and what else can be done."
Implications for Public Order
By specifically invoking Section 18 of the , the Court is emphasizing that the law already provides the state with the necessary teeth to restrict noise-generating activities. This development signals a shift from lenient oversight to a requirement for bureaucratic transparency.
The matter is slated for further review in the week commencing . For the authorities, the coming weeks present a final window to translate policy into practice or face potential stricter aimed at ensuring the to a noise-free environment for the citizens of Indore.
