Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Courts have also held that amendments related to court fee or relief sought, if filed after the trial has commenced, are generally not maintainable unless exceptional circumstances are shown. ["D.SHANMUGAM vs V.PONNUSAMY - Madras"], ["G. Narayana vs Postal Narayana - Telangana"]
Analysis and Conclusion:
In civil litigation, timing is everything. Imagine you're deep into a trial—proof affidavits filed, case posted for your evidence—and suddenly realize your court fee or relief claims need tweaking. Can a plaintiff file an application for amending the court fee and relief portion during the time of civil trial, when posted for plaintiff's evidence after filing proof affidavit? This question arises frequently, and the answer hinges on procedural rules and judicial discretion under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).
This post explores the permissibility, conditions, and judicial insights on such amendments. While courts generally favor justice over technicalities, specific requirements must be met. Note: This is general information based on legal precedents; consult a lawyer for case-specific advice.
Order VI Rule 17 CPC allows amendments to pleadings at any stage of the proceedings. This includes court fees and relief claims, even during trial. The rule states amendments can be made if they do not cause injustice or prejudice to the other party. Courts interpret 'trial commencement' flexibly—filing proof affidavits doesn't always bar amendments. Fritiz T. M. Clement VS Sudhakaran Nadar - 2002 2 Supreme 149
Key principle: Amendments further the ends of justice. As held, the object of allowing amendments is to prevent injustice and to enable the court to decide the real issues between parties. Fritiz T. M. Clement VS Sudhakaran Nadar - 2002 2 Supreme 149
Post-2002 CPC amendment restricts trial-stage changes unless the applicant shows due diligence—proving they couldn't raise the issue earlier despite reasonable efforts. Courts exercise discretion judiciously:
For court fees specifically, deficits can be rectified later if bona fide. The plaintiffs may be directed to pay deficit court fee at any point of time, if the Court finds necessary. D.SHANMUGAM vs V.PONNUSAMY
In one case, plaintiffs amended para 5 of the plaint for court fee purposes in a title declaration suit, paying under relevant acts—showing procedural flexibility. G. Narayana vs Postal Narayana - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 45646
Even after filing proof affidavits and posting for evidence, amendments aren't automatically barred. Courts assess:
The courts have clarified that amendments, including to court fee and reliefs, are permissible at any stage... provided the applicant demonstrates due diligence. Fritiz T. M. Clement VS Sudhakaran Nadar - 2002 2 Supreme 149
Judicial discretion is key: Courts have the inherent power to permit amendments even after evidence has been filed, provided the applicant shows that they could not have raised the matter earlier despite due diligence. Fritiz T. M. Clement VS Sudhakaran Nadar - 2002 2 Supreme 149
In a notable ruling, courts permitted relief and fee amendments during trial, emphasizing justice. Filing affidavits didn't mark 'trial start' to preclude changes. R. M. Sundaram @ Meenakshisundaram VS Sri Kayarohanasamy And Neelayadhakshi Amman Temple (through Its Executive Officer) Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1543
Another High Court allowed plaint amendment for declaration relief's court fee, despite delay, as prior amendment was permitted without check slip issuance. The court imposed costs (Rs. 2,000) but noted: If the petitioner/plaintiff is not permitted to amend the plaint, after paying the necessary Court fee... the real issue... will not be decided. Rengasamy VS Balaguru - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 2010
Contrastingly, Supreme Court disallowed amendment at arguments stage post-trial, absent due diligence: The amendment ordered by the trial Court cannot be allowed to stand as it was moved only at the stage of arguments, after the conclusion of trial. (2011 (12) SCC 268) K. Umapathy VS A. C. Abraham Kinsely - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 3557
In production of documents post-cross-examination, delay led to costs: The plaintiff has not acted promptly... awaited till the time of argument. Kailash Chandra Sarma S/o Late Rudreswar Sarma VS Rumamoni Das W/o Shri Bhuban Ch. Das - 2022 Supreme(Gau) 939
These highlight timing's role—prompt action post-realization boosts success.
Amendments may fail if:- They introduce entirely new causes of action. Fritiz T. M. Clement VS Sudhakaran Nadar - 2002 2 Supreme 149- No due diligence shown, causing prejudice.- Court fee deficits persist without justification; rejection possible under Rule 11(c). Minor Cibiraj VS C. Marimuthu - 2003 Supreme(Mad) 1344
Indigent suits add layers—courts must inquire capacity before rejecting. Minor Cibiraj VS M. Jayanthi - 2003 Supreme(Mad) 1337
To maximize success:1. File Promptly: Demonstrate why amendment wasn't sought earlier.2. Pay Fees Immediately: Accompany application with deficit payment or bona fide explanation.3. Argue Justice: Stress no prejudice, alignment with original plaint.4. Seek Costs Waiver if Needed: Courts may impose on opponent if delay theirs.
Trial courts should issue check slips for fees post-amendment, aiding compliance. Rengasamy VS Balaguru - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 2010
Navigating civil trials requires procedural savvy. While amendments offer flexibility, strategic timing prevents pitfalls. For tailored guidance, engage a civil litigation expert.
This article draws from precedents like Fritiz T. M. Clement VS Sudhakaran Nadar - 2002 2 Supreme 149, R. M. Sundaram @ Meenakshisundaram VS Sri Kayarohanasamy And Neelayadhakshi Amman Temple (through Its Executive Officer) Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1543, and others; laws evolve, verify current status.
#CivilLawIndia, #CPAmendment, #CourtFee
, unsustainable – Trial Court directed to grant three months' time to plaintiff to pay requisite court fees – Specific Relief Act, 1963. ... So, the plaintiffs have to pay necessary court fee under Sec.40 of the Act. Now, the evidence was completed. But with regard to payment of court fee, it is a mixed question of law and facts. The plaintiffs may be directed t....
Hence the plaintiffs paid the court fee of Rs.5126/- under sec.24(b) of T.S.C.F. and S.V.Act, 1956 which is sufficient and injunction relief its consequential relief to the main relief, hence separate court fee is not required. ... Amending Para No.5 of the plaint as follows: For the purpose of payment of court fee the suit of the plaintiff being declaration of title and injunct....
plaintiffs to pay court fee under S.40, unsustainable – Trial present application was filed only to amend the court fee because at the time of filing of the suit ... The plaintiffs may be directed to pay deficit court fee at any point of time, if the Court finds necessary. ... prayer, as such is not maintainable in law and also contended ....
of suit properties, the said suit is contested by the defendant and denied the plaintiffs case, the Trial Court framed issues and both side evidence was closed and the case was posted for arguments. ... In the present case also the petitioner has allowed the plaintiff to examine herself as P.W. 1 and the evidence of P.W.2 has also been recorded as could be seen from paragraph 3 of the counter affidavit dated 15.3.2001 filed by the 1st plain....
Hence the plaintiffs paid the court fee of Rs.5126/- under sec.24(b) of T.S.C.F. and S.V.Act, 1956 which is sufficient and injunction relief its consequential relief to the main relief, hence separate court fee is not required. 5. ... Amending Para No.5 of the plaint as follows: For the purpose of payment of court fee the suit of the plaintiff being declaration of title and injun....
the plaintiffs case, the Trial Court framed issues and both side evidence was closed and the case was posted to framing of additional issues in Court fee and land lord tenant ... In this case plaintiffs approached Court for relief of declaration to declare the sale deed as null and void and other fee. ... At that time, the defendants filed I.A No. 2 of 2019....
Further, the plaintiff has also filed a suit in O.S.No.11556 of 2010 on the file of the I Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai for the relief of mandatory injunction and the same is pending for framing of issues. ... The plaintiff states that the above suit was taken up for trial and the defendant as DW1 deposed in his evidence by proof affidavit dated 16.3.2011 and cross-examination dated 22.3.2011 and 12.4.2011 th....
The documents, the application and the Judges Summons were brought from the Registry and the learned Master took the additional documents on file and posted the case for filing proof affidavit of the plaintiffs. ... The suit was dismissed by the learned Single Judge for non-filing of the proof affidavit by the plaintiff as directed by the First Bench of this Court within a stipul....
Under Clause (c) of Rule 11, when the deficit court fee is not paid or when the plaintiff does not make good the deficit court fee even after granting time the court may reject the claim. In terms of Clause (c) of Rule 11, the court may grant extension of time. ... The plaintiffs moved the trial court by filing I.A.No.605 of 2002 for amendment of the plaint as w....
proof of his indigency and for hearing any evidence which may in proof of his indigency for hearing any evidence which may be adduced in disproof thereof. ... Under Clause (c) of Rule 11, when the deficit court fee is not paid or when the plaintiff does not make good the deficit court fee even after granting time the court may reject the claim. In terms of Clause (c) of Rule 11, the cour....
This court is also of the view that the plaintiff has not acted promptly when it was necessary and delayed the matter. The plaintiff could have filed an application for producing those documents during filing of his evidence on affidavit or at best could have file such application at the stage immediately after his cross-examination, when the objection to the documents were raised, but awaited till the time of argument. Therefore, this court of the view that the defendant is entitled for some cost for this lethargic behavior of the plaintiff and such cost is determined at R....
The respondent did not file written statement and he was set exparte. Subsequently, the respondent filed application to set aside the exparte order when the suit was posted for filing proof affidavit. The respondent was not ready and wiling to perform his part of contract for long period. The right of respondent for specific performance is extinguished and the respondent is not entitled to equitable relief of specific performance and prayed for dismissal of the suit.
Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner is before this Court. The Court below dismissed the said petition holding that the petitioner has not shown that he could not file the amendment petition earlier inspite of his due diligence. The respondents/defendants filed an additional written statement stating that the petitioner/plaintiff is not entitled to relief of declaration as he has not paid proper Court fee. After about four years of filing of the said additional written statement and after hearing both sides, when the matter posted for judgment, the petitioner/plaintiff filed....
Thereafter, the 3rd defendant filed an application in I.A.No.76 of 2015 on 10.04.2015 to set aside the ex-parte decree dated 13.03.2015. 4. The Trial Court posted the suit for trial and the plaintiff had also filed his proof affidavit. At that stage, since the 3rd defendant failed to appear before the Trial Court, the Trial Court set him ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was passed on 13.03.2015.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
