Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Authority and Legal Capacity - Santok Singh's authority was not challenged in the context of settlement or legal proceedings; however, it was noted that the Singh Chief Manager lacked authority to settle regarding back wages ["SRI KARANPUR KRAYA VIKRAYA S.SAMITI LTD vs JUDGE,IND.TRI.AND LABOUR COURT, and ORS - Rajasthan"].
Property and Possession Disputes - Santok Singh was involved as a witness in land possession and construction disputes, with testimonies indicating his knowledge of land transactions and possession status, though contradictions exist regarding payment locations and possession assertions ["Deegram VS Suchcha Singh - Rajasthan"].
Bonafide Requirement & Eviction Cases - Santok Singh was a party in eviction suits on grounds of bonafide requirement, with his son Jaswant Singh and Man Mohan Singh signing settlement deeds on his behalf when they were minors, and subsequent appeals were filed against eviction decrees ["Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 2 Supreme 761"], ["Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 0 Supreme(Raj) 362"].
Landlord-Tenant and Property Litigation - In rent and property disputes, Santok Singh was examined as a witness, with courts scrutinizing his statements about rent payments and his relationship with landlords. His death led to abatement of certain appeals, and courts ordered further evidence on whether his sons carried on business in his stead ["Kanhaiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - Rajasthan"].
Criminal and Investigation Cases - Santok Singh appeared as a witness in criminal investigations, with applications under Section 311 Cr.P.C. being allowed to summon him as an additional witness despite his absence in FIRs or initial statements. His involvement was considered relevant for evidence collection ["Surendra Singh VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"].
Litigation and Substitution of Accused - In cases involving trespass or political interference, Santok Singh was substituted as an accused in place of another individual, indicating his potential involvement or suspicion in certain criminal cases ["SRI KARANPUR KRAYA VIKRAYA S.SAMITI LTD vs JUDGE,IND.TRI.AND LABOUR COURT, and ORS - Rajasthan"].
Evidence and Conflicting Testimony - In robbery cases, Santok Singh was a witness whose testimony conflicted with the complainant's account, leading courts to consider his reliability and the need for corroboration before convicting accused persons [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MYS_MARSDENLR_1948_182), ["TARA SINGH vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR"], [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRA_1948_1_MLRA_187), ["TARA SINGH vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR"], ["TARA SINGH AND OTHERS vs PUBLIC PROSECUTOR - Court Of Appeal"].
Violence and Assault Cases - Santok Singh was injured during violent incidents involving unlawful assemblies, with witnesses describing attacks on him and others, and investigations noting injuries and attempts to secure medical aid ["KARTAR SINGH VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad"].
Family and Personal Status - Rani Bai and Ratno Bai, wives of Santok Singh and Khajan Singh respectively, were involved in FIRs, indicating his familial connections, while statements from relatives like Tejinder Singh and Santok Singh (PW) supported testimonies related to injuries and hospital cases ["SRI KARANPUR KRAYA VIKRAYA S.SAMITI LTD vs JUDGE,IND.TRI.AND LABOUR COURT, and ORS - Rajasthan"], ["Gurdeep Singh VS State - Delhi"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Santok Singh's role across these cases varies from witness to party in property disputes, and accused in criminal proceedings. His credibility is sometimes questioned, especially in cases involving conflicting testimonies, but he also appears as a key witness in investigations and property litigation. His death impacted ongoing legal proceedings, leading to abatement or further evidence requirements. Overall, Santok Singh's legal involvement demonstrates a complex profile of a person engaged in land disputes, criminal investigations, and family matters, with courts often scrutinizing his statements for reliability ["SRI KARANPUR KRAYA VIKRAYA S.SAMITI LTD vs JUDGE,IND.TRI.AND LABOUR COURT, and ORS - Rajasthan"], ["Deegram VS Suchcha Singh - Rajasthan"], ["Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 2 Supreme 761"], ["Surendra Singh VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand"].
In the vast landscape of Indian jurisprudence, queries like Babulal vs Santok Singh often surface in legal research, eviction disputes, or criminal appeals. Individuals searching for this case might expect a landmark confrontation between these two names. However, a thorough review of available legal documents reveals no direct litigation titled 'Babulal vs Santok Singh' or any adversarial proceedings between parties named Babulal and Santok SinghState Of M. P. VS Mishrilal (Dead) - 2003 0 Supreme(SC) 398State Of M. P. VS Mishrilal (Dead) - 2003 3 Supreme 182.
This blog post dives deep into the records, separating facts from assumptions. We'll examine cases involving each name individually, highlight the absence of overlap, and integrate insights from related sources. Whether you're a law student, tenant rights advocate, or curious researcher, understanding these distinctions can clarify common misconceptions in case law searches.
When users ask about Babulal vs Santok Singh, they typically seek the judgment, holdings, or outcomes of a specific dispute. Yet, the documents paint two distinct pictures:- Babulal as a complainant (PW-1) in a violent criminal incident.- Santok Singh in tenancy eviction appeals and a separate murder conviction.
No overlap exists—no shared docket, no opposing roles. This absence is crucial, as Indian courts handle thousands of cases annually, and name similarities can lead to confusion Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 2 Supreme 761Ajambi (Dead) By Lrs. VS Roshanbi - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 798.
Babulal emerges in a 1987 criminal matter stemming from a trivial dispute over a bullock-cart. As PW-1, Babulal reported that his cart was stopped by accused near Mishrilal's house, leading to reversal of route, narration to family (including deceased Bhavarsingh, his grandfather), and subsequent armed attack State Of M. P. VS Mishrilal (Dead) - 2003 0 Supreme(SC) 398State Of M. P. VS Mishrilal (Dead) - 2003 3 Supreme 182.
The bullock-cart, driven by Babulal's servant Patiram (PW-3), underscores a rural feud escalating to murder, typical of IPC riot cases State Of M. P. VS Mishrilal (Dead) - 2003 0 Supreme(SC) 398. No tenancy or civil angle ties to Santok Singh.
Santok Singh features in multiple unrelated matters, primarily a Rajasthan rent control eviction appeal.
Post-Santok Singh's death, his sons (e.g., Jaswant Singh, Man Mohan Singh) sought substitution as tenants under Section 3(vii) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, requiring proof they were ordinarily carrying on business... as members of his family up to his death Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 2 Supreme 761Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 0 Supreme(Raj) 362.
This 2009 SCC case (Kanhaiya Singh Santok Singh v. Kartar Singh) emphasizes factual probes in heir tenancy claims Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh VS Kartar Singh - 2009 0 Supreme(Raj) 362.
Santok Singh (with son Nirmail) convicted under Section 302/34 IPC for Sohan Singh's murder (life imprisonment + Arms Act). No Babulal link Santok Singh son of Shri Jarnail Singh (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2004 0 Supreme(All) 1728.
Broader searches yield snippets where names co-appear indirectly, but no opposition:- In a Rajasthan High Court matter, the application was moved by none other than Santok Singh about lack of authority on the part of Santok Singh to babulal/... Singh Chief Manager had no authority to enter into a settlement—suggesting administrative disputes, not direct parties SRI KARANPUR KRAYA VIKRAYA S.SAMITI LTD vs JUDGE,SRI KARANPUR KRAYA VIKRAYA S.SAMITI LTD vs JUDGE,IND.TRI.AND LABOUR COURT, and ORS - Rajasthan.TRI.AND LABOUR COURT, and ORS.- Another lists heirs: Meera wife of Babulal... (iv) Santok wife of Amba Lal—distinct individuals MEERA AND ORS vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP Advocate - P P.- Eviction reference: Santok Singh on the ground of bonafide requirement... Jaswant Singh aligns with tenancy case M/S KANHIYA SINGH SANTOK SINGH vs KARTAR SINGH.- Discharge under Essential Commodities Act: Santok Singh as contractor, no Babulal STATE OF ASSAM VS ACHIT RANJAN DEY - 1988 Supreme(Gau) 163.- Civil appeals cite similar names but no clash SMT. KAMLA DEVI vs SANTOK SINGH and ANRRatan Lal VS Sosar Bai - 2019 Supreme(Raj) 289.
These reinforce separate trajectories: Babulal in Madhya Pradesh-style riots, Santok Singh in Rajasthan civil/criminal spheres.
Courts stress evidence-based links—none here. Exceptions: Near-duplicates excluded as redundant; no external inferences allowed.
Disclaimer: This analysis draws from specified documents and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for case-specific guidance, as laws and interpretations may vary.
In summary, while 'Babulal vs Santok Singh' yields no direct hit, dissecting related cases illuminates broader Indian law themes—from riot prosecutions to tenant successions. Stay informed, search precisely, and reference originals for accuracy.
#IndianLawCases #TenancyDisputes #LegalAnalysis
No ground about the lack of authority vesting in Santok Singh was raised. ... Moreover, the application was moved by none other than Santok Singh about lack of authority on the part of Santok Singh to babulal/ ... Singh Chief Manager had no authority to enter into a settlement in regard to back wages.
who has constructed a pakka house and the remaining land was in possession of Jangir Singh, Suchcha Singh, Santok Singh and himself. ... The plaintiffs have also produced Santok Singh as PW6, the other son of Bhagwan Kaur. ... The plaintiff's other witness Santok Singh has also deposed against the plaintiffs asserting the possession to be continuing with Suchcha Singh and stating ignorance about the transaction. ... Apart from the ....
Meera Wife of Babulal, by caste Keer, aged 42 years, Resident of Kankraj Kala, Police Station Baroni, District namely, (i) Meera wife of Babulal ... (ii) Omli wife of Ramkishsor (iii) Santok wife of Amba Lal (iv) Prem wife of Ganesh (v) p style="position:absolute;white-space
Santok Singh on the ground of bonafide requirement. ... Singh. ... Singh. ... and Jaswant Singh.
On 24th of February, 1997, the respondent filed a suit for eviction against the father of the appellants Late Santok Singh (since deceased) and the firm owned by him namely M/s Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh on the ground of bonafide requirement. ... The appellants belonged to a joint family consisting of Santok Singh, father of the appellants (now deceased), and the appellants namely, Man Mohan Singh and Jaswant Singh. ... On 18th of S....
On 24th of February, 1997, the respondent filed a suit for eviction against the father of the appellants Late Santok Singh (since deceased) and the firm owned by him namely M/s Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh on the ground of bonafide requirement. ... The appellants belonged to a joint family consisting of Santok Singh, father of the appellants (now deceased), and the appellants namely, Man Mohan Singh and Jaswant Singh. ... On 18th of S....
Much has been said that Kartar Singh, landlord is not speaking the truth, he was not having talking terms with Santok Singh in spite of this, he has stated that he used to talk with Santok Singh and Santok Singh used to give him rent whereas fact is not in dispute that Santok Singh has not ... Land Lord respondent has examined himself as PW/1, PW/2 Devraj, PW/3 Manvendra Singh, and PW/4 Shyamsunder Vaishnav wherea....
By the aforesaid judgement and order, the learned Sessions Judge discharged three accused persons, namely, Achit Ranjan Dey, Santok Singh and Debendra Singh under Section 7(1) (a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act and under Sections 120(B), 407/409, IPC. ... Accused Santok is a contractor under C.P.W.D. and he has been allotted construction works in the C.R.P.F. campus at Khanapara. 600 bags of cement far the purpose of execution of the aforesaid works were allotted to accused Santok. ... One Assista....
Civil First Appeal No.32/2016 “Santok Singh Vs. Smt. ... Santok Singh & Anr. .. ... Santok Singh & Anr. .. ... Santok Singh & Anr. .. ... Singh to vacate S.B.
During trial PW1 Seva Singh, complainant and PW2 Kuldeep Kaur were examined and cross-examined, thereafter an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was moved before the Magistrate to summon Harjinder Singh and Santok Singh as additional witnesses stating that Harjinder Singh and Santok Singh also went ... A perusal of the FIR would show that names of Harjinder Singh and Santok Singh were not figured in the FIR. Eve....
Bishna @ Bhiswadeb Mahato Vs. State of West Bengal [2005 DGLS(SC) 942] 12. 9. State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Anil Singh [1988 DGLS(SC)507] 10. Babulal Bhagwan Khandare Vs. State of Maharashtra [2004 DGLS(SC) 1108] 11. Ashok Rai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [(2014) 5 SCC 713] 13.
Learned counsel, in support of his submissions, has relied on following judgments: * Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh (M/s.) & Ors. vs. Kartar Singhm, 2009 DNJ (SC) 810. * Gopi Kishan vs. Bajrang Lal & Anr., 1996 (2) WLC (Raj.) 585
The suit was dismissed by the trial court against which appeal was filed, which was allowed. In Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh v. Kartar Singh, (2009) 5 SCC 155, a suit was filed for eviction from a shop against tenant (Santok Singh) and his firm on ground of bona fide need.
10. In Kanhiya Singh Santok Singh v. Kartar Singh, (2009) 5 SCC 155, a suit was filed for eviction from a shop against tenant (Santok Singh) and his firm on ground of bona fide need. The suit was dismissed by the trial court against which appeal was filed, which was allowed.
The suit was registered as Civil Suit No. 3 of 1934 (N) between Sardar Santok Singh and others vs. 4. A Civil Suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed before the District Judge, Kumaon in the year 1934. The District Judge delivered its judgment on 20.08.1935 and framed guidelines for administration and management of the Shrine Gurudwara Nanakmatta.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
