Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
The complaint must be filed after the expiry of 15 days from the date the legal notice is served and the drawer fails to make payment ["Sunil Kumar Bhagat VS State of Jharkhand - Current Civil Cases"] ["Sunil Kumar Bhagat, S/o Late Sheopujan Bhagat VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"] ["Jasbir Singh Sodhi VS G. S. Bhalla - Punjab and Haryana"] ["Lachhmi Singh vs Rajesh Radhaik - Himachal Pradesh"] ["Shri Apurva (Proprietor) A. D. Builder VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"] ["Haryana State Cooperative Supply And Marketing Federation Ltd VS Hanuman Rice Mill - Punjab and Haryana"] ["MARUTI EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Dishonour Of Cheque"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Sunil Kumar Bhagat VS State of Jharkhand - Current Civil Cases"]- ["Sunil Kumar Bhagat, S/o Late Sheopujan Bhagat VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["Jasbir Singh Sodhi VS G. S. Bhalla - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["A.T.ANTONY Vs MRS.SHERJI HANEEFA - Kerala"]- ["P.S. Madhusoodanan vs Alamelu Ammal - Kerala"]- ["GOPAL KRISHAN vs STATE and ANR - Rajasthan"]- ["Paarth Projects VS Balaji Enterprises - Gauhati"]- ["MARUTI EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Dishonour Of Cheque"]- ["Satyendra Tiwari VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh"]
Receiving a cheque return memo can be frustrating, especially when you're counting on those funds. But in India, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act), there's a strict timeline to follow for sending a lawyer's notice and filing a case. Missing these deadlines can make your complaint time-barred, leaving you without remedy.
A common question arises: Correct position in cheque case after return memo: within how many days should lawyers' notice be sent, and after delivery to accused, within how many days should the case be filed? This guide breaks it down step-by-step, drawing from key case laws and statutory provisions to help you navigate this process effectively. Note: This is general information based on legal precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your case.
Section 138 makes the dishonour of a cheque due to insufficient funds or other reasons a criminal offence. The process involves:- Receiving the bank's dishonour memo.- Sending a demand notice to the drawer (accused).- Filing a complaint if payment isn't made.
Timelines are critical, as courts strictly enforce them. Delays can lead to dismissal, as seen in multiple judgments. Munoth Investments VS Puttukola Properties LTD. - 2001 6 Supreme 79
Here's the precise sequence:
The clock starts when the payee or holder in due course receives the bank's memo about the cheque being returned unpaid. The fifteen days are to be counted from the receipt of information regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid. Munoth Investments VS Puttukola Properties LTD. - 2001 6 Supreme 79 This is not from the cheque presentation date. Geetha VS Vasanthi S. Shetty - Dishonour Of Cheque (2010)
The notice must demand payment of the cheque amount. In one case, a notice dated 15.06.2009 was sent through registered post after a return memo on 11.06.2009, demanding payment within 15 days of receipt. Girraj Sharma VS Devender - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 1581
Tip: Send via registered post or speed post for proof. Even if returned unclaimed, receipt is presumed from the return date. Geetha VS Vasanthi S. Shetty - Dishonour Of Cheque (2010)
The drawer gets 15 days from notice receipt to pay. Failure triggers the cause of action. The accused is given 15 days from the receipt of the demand notice to make payment. Rozy Kukreja VS Finance Associates - Dishonour Of Cheque (2004)
Interestingly, even if the accused claims non-receipt, they can pay within 15 days of court summons. Manjulaben H. Pandya VS Gurumukhdas Bhagwandas Vaswani - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1560
File the complaint in the Magistrate's court within one month (30 days) from the end of the 15-day notice period. Narsingh Das Tapadia VS Goverdhan Das Partani - 2000 0 Supreme(Ker) 426
Summary Timeline:- Day 0: Receive dishonour memo.- Within 15/30 days: Send demand notice.- 15 days post-notice receipt: Cause of action if no payment.- Within 30 days thereafter: File complaint.
If notice is sent late, the complaint is time-barred. If the notice is sent after this period, the complaint or prosecution becomes time-barred. Munoth Investments VS Puttukola Properties LTD. - 2001 6 Supreme 79 Similarly, If the notice is delayed beyond the statutory period, the complaint or prosecution may be considered time-barred. Aditya Ram Sharma @ A. R. Sharma VS Vijay Kumar - 2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 1280
Courts presume service if properly sent, even if returned unclaimed. The receipt of the notice can be presumed if the notice is sent correctly, even if it is returned unclaimed, from the date of return. Geetha VS Vasanthi S. Shetty - Dishonour Of Cheque (2010) A notice sent to the correct address suffices, regardless of actual receipt. GOPAL KRISHAN vs STATE and ANR
Clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 gives the drawer 15 days from notice receipt to pay, creating the cause of action upon failure. Manjulaben H. Pandya VS Gurumukhdas Bhagwandas Vaswani - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1560
Avoid These Errors:- Counting from cheque date, not memo receipt.- Ignoring proof of dispatch.- Filing beyond 30 days post-cause of action.
To strengthen your case:- Act Promptly: Send notice within the statutory limit (typically 30 days now).- Document Everything: Retain memo, postal receipts, and notice copies.- Correct Address: Use the drawer's known address. GOPAL KRISHAN vs STATE and ANR- File Timely: Within one month of notice expiry.- Seek Legal Help: A lawyer ensures compliance and handles service.
In a typical scenario: Cheque dishonoured on Day 1, memo received Day 3 → Notice by Day 33 (30 days) → No payment by Day 48 → Complaint by Day 78.
| Step | Timeline | Key Citation ||------|----------|--------------|| Receive Memo | Day 0 | Munoth Investments VS Puttukola Properties LTD. - 2001 6 Supreme 79 || Send Notice | Within 30 days | Munoth Investments VS Puttukola Properties LTD. - 2001 6 Supreme 79Rozy Kukreja VS Finance Associates - Dishonour Of Cheque (2004) || Drawer Response | 15 days | Rozy Kukreja VS Finance Associates - Dishonour Of Cheque (2004) || File Complaint | Within 30 days of expiry | Narsingh Das Tapadia VS Goverdhan Das Partani - 2000 0 Supreme(Ker) 426 |
In conclusion, adhering to these timelines under Section 138 NI Act is crucial for successful prosecution in cheque bounce cases. Delays often prove fatal, as courts prioritize statutory compliance. While presumptions favor payees, precision protects your rights. For tailored advice, consult a legal professional familiar with NI Act matters.
References:- Rozy Kukreja VS Finance Associates - Dishonour Of Cheque (2004): Notice timing post-dishonour.- Munoth Investments VS Puttukola Properties LTD. - 2001 6 Supreme 79: 30-day notice period.- Aditya Ram Sharma @ A. R. Sharma VS Vijay Kumar - 2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 1280: Delay effects.- Geetha VS Vasanthi S. Shetty - Dishonour Of Cheque (2010): Unclaimed notice presumption.- Narsingh Das Tapadia VS Goverdhan Das Partani - 2000 0 Supreme(Ker) 426: Complaint filing limit.- Girraj Sharma VS Devender - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 1581, Manjulaben H. Pandya VS Gurumukhdas Bhagwandas Vaswani - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1560, GOPAL KRISHAN vs STATE and ANR: Supporting examples.
This article is for informational purposes only and reflects general legal positions as of available precedents.
#ChequeBounce #Section138 #NIACT
Admittedly, notice was sent by the speed post on 07.01.2001 and the complaint was filed on 20.04.2001. Even if the presumption of deemed service within a reasonable time of 30 days (i.e., 16.02.2001) is taken, the accused was required to make payment within 15 days i.e. on or about 02.03.2001. ... Subsequently, the Branch Manager issued duplicate cheque return memo dated 27.10.2007 in favour of th....
case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.” ... Admittedly, notice was sent by the speed post on 07.01.2001 and the complaint was filed on 20.04.2001. Even if the presumption of deemed service within a reasonable time of 30 days (i.e., 16.02.2001) is taken, the accused was required to make payment within 15 #HL_S....
Complainant then served a legal notice dated 15.06.2009 through his Advocate and sent it to the accused through registered post, asking him to make payment of the cheque amount within 15 days of the receipt of the notice. However, despite receipt of the notice, accused failed to make payment. ... Ex.C2 is the bank return memo report dated 11.06.2009, as per which cheque was retur....
Any drawer who claims that he did not receive the notice sent by post, can, within 15 days of receipt of summons from the court in respect of the complaint under Section 138 of the Act, make payment of the cheque amount and submit to the Court that he had made payment within 15 days of receipt of summons ... from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid. ... True, there was no averment to the effect that the ....
Section 138 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act states that a notice has to be issued within 15 days of the receipt of information by him from the Bank regarding the return of the cheque. ... He also stated that when a cheque is dishonoured the person will be informed overphone or the matter will be intimated to him within 2 days by registered post. There will be also return memo and the debit advise. What is fou....
, sent to him within the time period of 30 days from the date of return memo. ... In this case, Bank issued return memo regarding the cheques as unpaid on 30.04.2019. The legal notice dated 22.05.2019 as well as 29.05.2019, are both within limitation period of 30 days from the date of return memo. ... of the cheque, within fif....
It is contended that even if the legal notice sent to the accused prior to filing of the complaint could not be served upon him as he was on leave, the filing of the complaint itself amounts to serving of the notice and that accused could have made the payment within 15 days after being served of the ... As noticed above, the entire purpose of requiring a notice is to give an opportunity to the drawer to pay the cheque amount #HL_ST....
Even if, in a case he has not received a notice by post, it is open for the accused to make payment of cheque amount within a period of 15 days of summons of the Court in respect of complaint under section 138 of the N.I. ... from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid. ... from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid. ... It is for this reason that clause (c) of proviso to Section 138 ....
A notice demanding the cheque amount within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice was given to the petitioner running no matter that the payee sent the notice at the correct notice demanding the cheque amount was sent to the petitioner on his correct address. ... The notice was sent on the correct address of th....
The learned trial Court rightly held that the notice had to be sent within a period of 15 days from the receipt of the intimation regarding the dishonour of the cheque and if the notice was sent even after the period of 15 days from the receipt of the information, regarding the dishonour of the cheque ... , makes a demand for the demand of said amount of money by giving a notice in writing to the drawer of the #HL_....
In the model premium pass book also, we find no such condition, as seen from Ex.B1. This is not a condition attached to validate or invalidate, the claim or the policy, whereas it is a procedure, prescribing, within how many days, a claim should be made, and within how many days claim should be settled, thereby prescribing directions, which cannot be the terms and conditions, to be followed as mandatory, whereas it should be construed as directly. If really, neither the Insurance Company, nor the bank, who collected the premium, had thought, that the sum assured was not cla....
Before what period and within how many days the same would heal up. " You are therefore, requested to examine the said injuries and issue report stating therein as to with what object the same have been caused. The Medical Officer had found four injuries on his hands. It is therefore, apparent that this witness had tried to extinguish the fire of the deceased, when she was alive and must be shouting, he is not examined by the prosecution.
Since already 30 days have been passed from the date of my first application received. 5. According to you rules, in how many days should the details be granted? 4. Please give the proof of receipt and dispatch of my application in the office of each of these officials.
4. Please give the proof of receipt and dispatch of my application in the office of each of these officials. 5. According to your rules, in how many days should the details be granted? Since already 30 days have been passed from the date of my first application received.
4. Please give the proof of receipt and dispatch of my application in the office of each of these officials. 5. According to your rules, in how many days should the details be granted ? Since already 30 days have been passed from the date of my first application received.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
