AI Thinking...

Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!

Scanned Judgements…!

Checking relevance for Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, Ahmedabad VS Ramanbhai Prabhatbhai...

Checking relevance for Oriental Insurance Company LTD. VS Hansrajbhai V. Kodala...

Checking relevance for United India Insurance Company LTD. VS Patricia Jean Mahajan...

Checking relevance for National Insurance Co. LTD. VS Swaran Singh...

Checking relevance for Valsamma Chacko VS M. A. Titto...

Checking relevance for Shivaji Dayanu Patil VS Vatschala Uttam More...

Checking relevance for Master Mallikarjun VS Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Company Limited...

Master Mallikarjun VS Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Company Limited - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 780 : For minor children suffering disability in motor vehicle accidents, the appropriate compensation for non-pecuniary damages (including pain, suffering, mental shock, loss of amenities, inconvenience, frustration, and deprivation of normal childhood activities) is determined based on the percentage of permanent disability to the whole body. The compensation is calculated as follows: Rs. 1 lakh for disability up to 10%; Rs. 3 lakhs for disability above 10% and up to 30%; Rs. 4 lakhs for disability up to 60%; Rs. 5 lakhs for disability up to 90%; and Rs. 6 lakhs for disability above 90%. This approach is distinct from the formula in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, which is considered inadequate for children due to their lack of income and the long-term impact of disability. The compensation should be awarded as a lump sum to enable the child to overcome the disability''''s effects and maintain a dignified lifestyle. This method is supported by precedents involving children with disabilities of 16%, 80%, and 90%.Checking relevance for Prabhat Kumar VS Dheeraj...

Checking relevance for TSRTC REP BY ITS M.D. HYDERABAD AND ANR vs C RAMULU HYDERABAD...

Checking relevance for MANAGING PARTNER, PRIME SANITARIES VS PATHUMMA W/O LATE BAKKAR...

Checking relevance for New India Assurance Co. Ltd. VS Ramrul @ Munna Lokane Mina...

Checking relevance for Dineshkumar Chhatrasinh Koli Patel VS Kachrabhai Manabhai Gari...

Dineshkumar Chhatrasinh Koli Patel VS Kachrabhai Manabhai Gari - 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 1177 : The court emphasized that compensation for a minor child victim of a motor vehicle accident should be calculated based on the percentage of permanent disability, with specific reference to the slab laid down in the case of Master Mallikarjun. The method includes consideration of both pecuniary damages (such as medical expenses, treatment costs, transportation, and attendant care) and non-pecuniary damages, especially for children. The Tribunal''''s assessment of 35.47% permanent disability was used as a basis for determining compensation, and the court directed that the compensation be calculated in accordance with the slab established in Master Mallikarjun, which provides a structured approach to compensation based on the degree of disability.Checking relevance for New India Assurance Co. Ltd Through VS Ramrul @ Munna Lokane Mina...

Checking relevance for New India Assurance Company Limited VS Malladi Sumathi...

Checking relevance for Damyanti Devi And Others VS Sita Devi And Others...

Checking relevance for KAMLA DEVI VS KISHANCHAND...

Checking relevance for United India Insurance Company Ltd. VS Veluchamy...

Checking relevance for B S Nat VS Bachan Singh...

Checking relevance for Fakkirappa VS Yallawwa...

Checking relevance for Sarla Verma VS Delhi Transport Corporation...

Checking relevance for Rani Gupta VS United India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...

Checking relevance for AJAY KUMAR SHAKYA VS KANTI DEVI...

Checking relevance for Hem Chand VS Dila Ram...

Checking relevance for NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, AZAMGARH...

Checking relevance for New India Assurance Company Limited VS Ivth Additional District Judge/Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Azamgarh and Another...

Checking relevance for Gangaraju Sowmini VS Alavala Sudhakar Reddy...

Checking relevance for National Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ab. Karim...

AI Overview...

Compensation for Child Victims - Compensation can be awarded to children involved in motor vehicle accidents, considering factors such as age, injuries, and negligence of the driver. The MACT (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) assesses liability and computes fair compensation based on established principles and schedules APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh, Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court, New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat, Khem Raj Chettri VS Hem Bahadur Chettri - Sikkim, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd, rep by its Branch Manager vs Y. Vijayakumar, S/o. Ravindranatham - Andhra Pradesh, Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - Bombay, Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Karnataka.
Age and Notional Income - For children, the courts typically adopt a notional income (e.g., Rs. 15,000 per annum for children below 10 years; Rs. 15,000 for a 12-year-old) and apply appropriate multipliers (generally between 13-15) to calculate dependency loss. For example, in one case, a 12-year-old child's dependency was calculated with a multiplier of 15, resulting in Rs. 3,75,000/- Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court, New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat, Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - Bombay.
Determination of Compensation - The courts consider various heads such as loss of dependency, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and special damages. The quantum is adjusted based on age, severity of injuries, and established legal precedents, with courts often enhancing or modifying initial awards for fairness APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd, rep by its Branch Manager vs Y. Vijayakumar, S/o. Ravindranatham - Andhra Pradesh, Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Karnataka.
Negligence and Liability - The driver’s negligence is a primary factor. Courts examine evidence like driver’s speed, road conditions, and contributory negligence of claimants. In some cases, the driver was found negligent, leading to liability on the vehicle owner and insurer. Conversely, claims of contributory negligence (e.g., claimant on wrong side or under influence) can impact compensation awards Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation VS Rajbir Singh - Delhi, New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs NALABAM AUDI LAKSHMAMMA & ANR - Andhra Pradesh.
Specific Case Insights -
For a 6-year-old injured in a road accident, courts have awarded compensation ranging from Rs. 6,61,000/- to Rs. 7,16,000/- after modifications, considering the nature of injuries and negligence APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh.
In cases of children who died (e.g., aged 10-12), courts have awarded compensation around Rs. 5,00,000/- based on the severity of injuries and applicable schedules Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court, Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - Bombay.
For injuries such as fractures and permanent disabilities, courts assess the extent of disability and future expenses to determine fair compensation Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Karnataka.
Conclusion - Under the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) framework, compensation for a 6-year-old child injured in a road accident is determined by assessing negligence, age-specific notional income, injury severity, and applicable legal principles. Awards are often in the range of Rs. 6-7 lakhs, with adjustments for interest and specific circumstances APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh, Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court, New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat.

References:- APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh- Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court- Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation VS Rajbir Singh - Delhi- New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat- Oriental Insurance Company VS Zahir Abbas S/o Sh. Akbar Hussain - 2023 Supreme(J&K) 204 - 2023 0 Supreme(J&K) 204- Khem Raj Chettri VS Hem Bahadur Chettri - Sikkim- Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd, rep by its Branch Manager vs Y. Vijayakumar, S/o. Ravindranatham - Andhra Pradesh- Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - Bombay- ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs NALABAM AUDI LAKSHMAMMA & ANR - Andhra Pradesh- Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Karnataka

5-Year-Old Child with 90% Disability in Motor Accident: Compensation Explained

Road accidents involving young children are heartbreaking and often result in lifelong consequences. Imagine a 5-year-old child sustaining a 90% permanent disability due to a motor vehicle collision. Families naturally wonder: Motor Accident Claim Child Aged 5 Years Sustained 90 Percentage Disability Income will be what? This blog post breaks down the legal framework, calculation methods, and insights from case laws to help you understand potential compensation under India's Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Note: This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.

Legal Framework Governing Child Injury Claims

Compensation for injuries to children in road accidents falls under Sections 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) assesses claims, determining liability based on negligence and computing fair amounts for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses. Courts emphasize protecting vulnerable victims like children, considering future earning potential despite no current income. Compensation can be awarded to children involved in motor vehicle accidents, considering factors such as age, injuries, and negligence of the driver.APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court

For permanent disabilities like 90%, tribunals factor in medical expenses, loss of future earnings, pain, suffering, and family impact. Negligence is key: Courts examine evidence like driver’s speed, road conditions, and contributory negligence.Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation VS Rajbir Singh - Delhi New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat

Key Considerations for Compensation in Child Disability Cases

When calculating awards for a child with 90% disability, courts use structured approaches:

Notional Income: Children lack actual earnings, so courts adopt a notional figure adjusted for inflation. For children aged 5 to 10 years, it's generally Rs. 30,000 per annum.Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court Yashodamma S. VS Regional Manager Reliance General Insurance Co. Limited - Supreme Court. Other precedents suggest Rs. 15,000 for children below 10 years, with compounding for inflation. To the notional income of Rs.15,000/-... the recorded inflation rate for every year should be compounded annually.Master Karthik R. , S/o V. Rajababu VS National insurance co. Ltd. - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 513 - 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 513
Multiplier Method: Based on the parents' age (as dependents), a multiplier of 15 is typical for a 5-6-year-old child. For a child aged 6 years, a multiplier of 15 is typically used.Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court Kaushalya Devi VS Karan Arora - Supreme Court. Courts typically adopt... Rs. 15,000 per annum for children below 10 years; Rs. 15,000 for a 12-year-old) and apply appropriate multipliers (generally between 13-15).Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat
Loss of Earning Capacity Due to 90% Disability: With 90% disability, compensation focuses on permanent impairment. This includes future medical costs, attendant care, and reduced employability. For injuries such as fractures and permanent disabilities, courts assess the extent of disability and future expenses.Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Karnataka
Conventional Heads: Pain, suffering, loss of amenities, and emotional trauma add significant amounts. Additional compensation may be awarded under conventional heads such as pain and suffering, loss of amenities.RAJENDRA SINGH VS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Supreme Court Master Mallikarjun VS Divisional Manager, The National Insurance Company Limited - Supreme Court. When victim of the motor vehicle accident is child, aged two years, the immediate loss to parents of the child is huge, non-pecuniary or cannot be compensated in terms of money. There are immense pains and sufferings for parents and family members of child.Oriental Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, Civil Lines VS Ashok son of Sukhdeo Patil - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 2472 - 2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2472
Other Damages: Medical bills, rehabilitation, and special damages are reimbursed. Tribunals often enhance awards for fairness. The courts consider various heads such as loss of dependency, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and special damages.APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd, rep by its Branch Manager vs Y. Vijayakumar, S/o. Ravindranatham - Andhra Pradesh

Insights from Landmark Case Laws

Indian courts have set precedents for child injury claims:

Kishan Gopal v. Lala Ram: Supreme Court awarded Rs. 5,00,000 for a child's death, stressing future prospects and emotional loss. Principles apply to severe injuries. Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court
Kurvan Ansari: Rs. 4,70,000 for a 7-year-old, using notional income and multipliers. Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court
Sarla Verma Case: Guidelines for multipliers based on claimant age, crucial for minors. Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court

Specific child injury examples:- For a 6-year-old, awards ranged from Rs. 6,61,000 to Rs. 7,16,000 post-modification, considering injuries and negligence. APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh- 12-year-old's dependency: Rs. 3,75,000 with multiplier 15. Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat- Fracture cases (e.g., femur shaft): Courts award based on age and role, like SPO injuries. The injury suffered... was right leg fracture shaft of femur.Oriental Insurance Company VS Zahir Abbas S/o Sh. Akbar Hussain - 2023 0 Supreme(J&K) 204

In cases of children who died (e.g., aged 10-12), courts have awarded compensation around Rs. 5,00,000/- based on the severity of injuries.Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - Bombay

Step-by-Step Compensation Calculation Recommendations

Here's a typical method for a 5-year-old with 90% disability:

Notional Income: Rs. 30,000 p.a. (or Rs. 15,000+ inflation-adjusted). Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court Yashodamma S. VS Regional Manager Reliance General Insurance Co. Limited - Supreme Court
Deduct Personal Expenses: 1/3 (Rs. 10,000), leaving Rs. 20,000 for dependency.
Apply Multiplier: 15 (parents' age-based). Loss = Rs. 20,000 x 15 = Rs. 3,00,000.
Add Disability-Specific Amounts:
Future medical/rehab: Rs. 1,00,000+ (assess via evidence).
Pain/suffering: Rs. 50,000 - 1,00,000.
Loss of amenities: Rs. 1,00,000+ for 90% disability.
Emotional/Non-Pecuniary: Additional for family trauma. The emotional impact... cannot be quantified merely in financial terms.RAJENDRA SINGH VS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Supreme Court Kaushalya Devi VS Karan Arora - Supreme Court

Total Estimate: Rs. 5,00,000 - 7,50,000 or higher, depending on facts. Awards often reach Rs. 6-7 lakhs for similar 6-year-olds. APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court

Interest (7-9%) and inflation adjustments apply. The object of awarding this compensation is that the pecuniary loss... does not take care of all the losses.Satya Prakash VS State - 2013 Supreme(Del) 1345 - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1345

Liability and Insurance Aspects

Insurance companies may contest, e.g., if unlicensed driver: Insurance Company is not liable... who was not holding any driving licence.Shivashankar VS Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. - Consumer. Owner-driver policies have limits. This position holds good even where the vehicle is insured for own damages...Sangeetha W/o Late Subramani VS Krishna Chari S/o Puttachari - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 333 - 2018 0 Supreme(Kar) 333

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

For a 5-year-old with 90% disability from a motor accident, compensation typically ranges from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 7,50,000+, blending notional income (Rs. 15,000-30,000), multiplier 15, and heads like disability loss and suffering. Under the MACT framework... Awards are often in the range of Rs. 6-7 lakhs.APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court

Key Takeaways:- Gather medical reports proving 90% disability.- Prove negligence via FIR/police reports.- File promptly with MACT.- Expect holistic assessment beyond finances.

Seek expert advice to maximize your claim. Justice for child victims prioritizes future security.

References

Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - Supreme Court Yashodamma S. VS Regional Manager Reliance General Insurance Co. Limited - Supreme Court RAJENDRA SINGH VS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Supreme Court Kaushalya Devi VS Karan Arora - Supreme Court APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - Andhra Pradesh New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - Gujarat Oriental Insurance Company VS Zahir Abbas S/o Sh. Akbar Hussain - 2023 0 Supreme(J&K) 204 Master Karthik R. , S/o V. Rajababu VS National insurance co. Ltd. - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 513 - 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 513 Oriental Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, Civil Lines VS Ashok son of Sukhdeo Patil - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 2472 - 2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2472 Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Karnataka

#MotorAccidentClaim, #ChildInjuryCompensation, #MACT

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6264

NL- 03-A-8696 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘offending vehicle’) at Mauje near Ghodbandar Gaon, Varsova Naka, Mumbai- Ahmednagar Highway Road. Due to this unfortunate accident the deceased minor child and his father fell on the road and sustained serious injuries. ... The relevant portion of Clause 6 states as under: "6. Notional income for compensation#HL_E....

Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - 2022 Supreme(Kar) 1274

The claimant is aged about 46 years at the time of the accident and multiplier applicable to his age group is 13'. ... It is not in dispute that the claimant has sustained injuries in the road traffic accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver. The claimant has produced IT Returns as per Ex.P18 to Ex.P21. ... As per wound certificate, the claimant has sus....

Master Karthik R. , S/o V. Rajababu VS National insurance co. Ltd. - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 513

5. However, while computing this sum, this Court has held in MFA 11440/2011 and connected matters that to the notional income of Rs.15,000/-and the lump sum compensation of Rs.4 lakhs, the recorded inflation rate for every year should be compounded annually. A ready reckoner of the compensation payable is also indicated therein in the form of 4 Tables. 6. The said judgment provides for determination of compensation for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss that the parents would enta....

Sangeetha W/o Late Subramani VS Krishna Chari S/o Puttachari - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 333

This position holds good even where the vehicle is insured for own damages and premium is paid to cover the risk of “owner-cum-driver” under comprehensive policy or contract policy. The basis for maintaining a petition, both under Sections 163A and 166 of the M.V. Act is provided under Section 147 of the M.V. Act. To sum up, in the opinion of this Court, a claim petition seeking payment of compensation in a road accident, by the owner of the vehicle or by any other person driving the....

Oriental Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, Civil Lines VS Ashok son of Sukhdeo Patil - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 2472

6. When victim of the motor vehicle accident is child, aged two years, the immediate loss to parents of the child is huge, non-pecuniary or cannot be compensated in terms of money. There are immense pains and sufferings for parents and family members of child.

Shivashankar VS Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

In FIR, this fact has specifically been mentioned that driver himself sustained injuries. Injured persons filed MACT claim and Motor Accident Tribunal decided all claims by order dated 29.11.2011 and held that Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation as vehicle was driven by Umesh at the time of accident who was not holding any driving licence to drive the said vehicle. In such circumstances, it can be very well inferred that at the time of accident, Umesh was driv....

Satya Prakash VS State - 2013 Supreme(Del) 1345

The object of awarding this compensation is that the pecuniary loss calculated on the basis of the multiplier does not take care of all the losses suffered by the family of the deceased. Where victims have received the compensation from MACT (i) If the family of the deceased have received Rs.14,00,000/- through the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Court may award a further compensation in the range of Rs.1,00,000/- under Section 357 Cr.P.C. Apart from the pecuniary loss, c....

AI Thinking...

AI Overview...

5-Year-Old Child with 90% Disability in Motor Accident: Compensation Explained

Legal Framework Governing Child Injury Claims

Key Considerations for Compensation in Child Disability Cases

Insights from Landmark Case Laws

Step-by-Step Compensation Calculation Recommendations

Liability and Insurance Aspects

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

References

Related Judgments

APSRTC vs Mattaparthi Anand Rao - 2025 Supreme(AP) 830

Meena Devi VS Nunu Chand Mahto @ Nemchand Mahto - 2022 8 Supreme 229

Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation VS Rajbir Singh - 2023 Supreme(Del) 5528

New India Insurance Company Ltd VS Minor Malhar Shashikantbhai Thro' Guardian Shashikantbhai Kanjibhai Parmar - 2024 Supreme(Guj) 1927

Oriental Insurance Company VS Zahir Abbas S/o Sh. Akbar Hussain - 2023 Supreme(J&K) 204

Khem Raj Chettri VS Hem Bahadur Chettri - 2024 Supreme(Sikk) 19

Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd, rep by its Branch Manager vs Y. Vijayakumar, S/o. Ravindranatham - 2025 Supreme(AP) 294

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs NALABAM AUDI LAKSHMAMMA & ANR - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 2254

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Rajashri Pramanik Sable - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6264

Prabhu Shankar VS Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - 2022 Supreme(Kar) 1274

Master Karthik R. , S/o V. Rajababu VS National insurance co. Ltd. - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 513

Sangeetha W/o Late Subramani VS Krishna Chari S/o Puttachari - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 333

Oriental Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, Civil Lines VS Ashok son of Sukhdeo Patil - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 2472

Shivashankar VS Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Satya Prakash VS State - 2013 Supreme(Del) 1345