IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Aarti Sathe, J.
Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd - Appellant
Versus
Smt.Rajashri Pramanik Sable and ors. - Respondents
First Appeal No.1660 of 2025
Decided On : 02-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the accident and damages awarded. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's analysis and reasoning on claims. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding compensation calculation and liability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal precedents applied in determining compensation. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision and order on appeal. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
Aarti Sathe, J.
1. This Appeal challenges the judgment and award dated 11th December 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment and award) passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to ‘MACT’) whereby the applicant (Respondent No. 1 herein) has been awarded an amount of Rs.35,92,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the MACT petition/application till its realization.
2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:-
i. Neil Pramanik Sable (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased minor child’) son of Respondent No.1 met with an accident on 8th November 2019 at about 1:40 pm when he was riding pillion on a motorcycle bearing no. MH-04- GL-4039 along with his father at a moderate speed with proper care and caution of the traffic. The motorcycle of the deceased was dashed from behind by a negligent and rash motor truck bearing no. NL- 03-A-8696 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘offending vehicle’) at Mauje near Ghodbandar Gaon, Varsova Naka, Mumbai- Ahmednagar Highway Road. Due to this unfortunate accident the deceased minor child and his father fell on the road and sustained serious injuries. The deceased minor child sustained fracture of right radius and right meta carpal, injury to right upper and lower limb, right forearm complete transaction of right radial rotary ligation of right rodinal of distal forearm and other multiple serious injuries. The deceased minor child was taken to Orbit Hospital for medical treatment and was admitted there from 8th November 2019 to 12th November 2019. Thereafter he was shifted to Infinity Medisurge Centre Speciality Hospital, Majiwada, Thane and admitted there, from 12th November 2019. However, he succumbed to his serious injuries on 6th January 2020 while undergoing medical treatment.
ii. A FIR was lodged in the year 2019 prior to the death of the deceased minor child at Kashimira Police Station District Thane.
iii. On 18th February 2020 Respondent No.1 filed Petition No. MACP No. 564 of 2020 before the MACT claiming an amount of Rs. 30,00,000/- towards medical expenses and Rs. 40,00,000/- along with interest as compensation from the date of application till realisation.
iv. The impugned judgment and award was passed on the aforesaid MACP No. 564 of 2020 in favour of Respondent No. 1, awarding a sum of Rs. 35,92,000/-, inclusive of compensation amount granted under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on the basis of no-fault liability which was to be jointly and severally payable by the Appellant and Respondent no. 2 in the present appeal.
v. Further the impugned judgment and award also awarded interest at the rate of 7.5 % on the amount of compensation to Respondent No.1 from the date of registration of the claim application till realization of the said amount which was also to be paid jointly and severally by the Appellant and Respondent No. 2.
3. It is in the backdrop of the above facts that I proceed to decide the present appeal.
4. Heard learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant and Respondent. Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant Ms. Kalpana Trividei along with Ms. Rajlaxmi Shettigar have submitted that the impugned judgment and award has been passed without appreciating the facts and law and the quantum of compensation which has been awarded by way of the aforesaid impugned judgment and award is excessive and arbitrary. They has further contended that the impugned judgment and award has erroneously assessed the notional income of the deceased minor child at Rs. 8,000/- per month, without any cogent proof of his actual earnings. It has been submitted that there was no docum
Compensation for the death of a minor should appropriately reflect medical expenses and loss of companionship, following guidelines on calculating loss based on age and contribution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the multiplier method and the use of minimum wages for determining notional income in cases of motor accidents involving the dea....
Post deletion of the Second Schedule, compensation for child victims of accidents must be based on Minimum Wages and include future prospects and proper deductions for personal expenses.
Compensation for minors in fatal accidents should reflect potential contributions, with a notional income of Rs.30,000/- applied, leading to an enhanced total of Rs.5,00,000/-.
The court established that the notional income for a minor in a motor accident claim must reflect just compensation, emphasizing the application of the multiplier system for calculating damages relat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.