Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Satyabrata Barik @ Mithu VS State of West Bengal - Crimes
"]Satyabrata Barik @ Mithu VS State of West Bengal - Crimes
"] ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1078"] ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 430"] ["2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 1741"] ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38566"] ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 65114"] ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1059"] ["2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4084"] ["2026 0 Supreme(Telangana) 39"] ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1536"] ["2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2781"]CHAN CHEAN GAIK (MERRINA) vs ONG GAIK THINAG & ORS - High Court
"]Satyabrata Barik @ Mithu VS State of West Bengal - Crimes
"] ["2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1278"] ["2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 723"] ["CHAN CHEAN GAIK (MERRINA) vs ONG GAIK THINAG & ORS - High Court
"]
Stalking can cause profound emotional distress, fear, and disruption to daily life. If you've experienced persistent unwanted attention, monitoring, or , you might wonder: can a on stalking be pursued in Malaysia? This blog post breaks down the legal landscape, drawing from established precedents in the . While criminal remedies exist, civil actions offer victims a path to personal redress through similar to sexual or . Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
A is any proceeding by any party or parties against another in Court of Law, as defined in Black's Law Dictionary, or in Malay, tindakan sivil yang diambil oleh satu pihak terhadap pihak yang lain di mahkamah.
In Malaysia, such suits for stalking are typically commenced under in the as a standard civil action.
Stalking isn't explicitly codified as a standalone tort but is actionable as a private wrong akin to , sexual assault, or . Courts have upheld similar claims, emphasizing no implied immunities even against public officials in their personal capacity.
Initiate via a under Order 5 of the Rules of Court. Plead stalking as or trespass, supported by evidence of repeated unwanted conduct causing harm. This positions it as a standard originating process in the High Court.
Victims should document incidents meticulously—texts, calls, sightings—to meet the civil proof threshold. Unlike criminal cases requiring , civil suits tip the scales if more likely than not.
Civil suits can run parallel to other forums, like industrial courts, without automatic stays. In one ruling, the lacked jurisdiction to suspend for overlapping civil matters: The has no jurisdiction to suspend proceedings pending resolution of parallel civil proceedings as no statutory authority supports such action.
This promotes efficiency unless express statutory power or special circumstances justify a .
While Malaysian courts focus on tort analogies, stalking often intersects with criminal law elsewhere, offering comparative context. For instance, in India, stalking under involves monitoring via internet or email, but charges may be quashed for lack of evidence while related persists: allegations are sufficient to proceed to trial, while stalking charges are quashed due to lack of evidence. 2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 39 This highlights the need for robust proof, mirroring Malaysia's .
In family law, stalking-like behavior (e.g., excessive surveillance) factors into under the , but unsubstantiated allegations fail: allegations of cruelty must be substantiated with evidence. 2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 796 Similarly, cases stress corroboration for prosecutrix testimony in stalking-sexual assault overlaps. 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 243
Other scenarios, like property disputes or wildlife conflicts involving 'stalking' metaphors, underscore context-specific analysis but don't directly apply to personal torts. 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 277 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1667
Inconsistent claims (e.g., vs. other processes) risk dismissal.
Engage counsel early to navigate procedural nuances.
Stalking victims have civil recourse, but success hinges on evidence and framing as a tort. For tailored guidance, reach out to a Malaysian legal professional. safe and informed.
: Suit definition and Order 5 commencement.
: suit example.
: Torts against officials.
: .
: Proof standard.
Tapas Dutta, appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 has mainly contended that if merely a Civil Suit is pending or there is prima facie civil dispute, it does not absolve the accused from criminal proceeding. ... In a given set of facts may make out a civil wrong as also a criminal offence and only because a civil remedy may also be available to the complainant that itself cannot be a ground to quash a criminal proceeding. ... (ii) A given set of facts may make out a civil wr....
Tapas Dutta, appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 has mainly contended that if merely a Civil Suit is pending or there is prima facie civil dispute, it does not absolve the accused from criminal proceeding. ... In a given set of facts may make out a civil wrong as also a criminal offence and only because a civil remedy may also be available to the complainant that itself cannot be a ground to quash a criminal proceeding. ... It is a settled proposition of law that both civil....
construed to be stalking. ... be visiting the disputed shop, which is subject matter of the suit and therefore, his mere visit to shop, cannot be treated to be that the applicant was committing offence of stalking. ... The applicant did argue about the civil suit being filed by the father and uncle of the applicant regarding a shop against the father of the victim because of which this FIR is filed, and that the applicant in the due course of his business, he used to visit the shop and therefore the sam....
After a short period, he resumed and continued stalking and thereby she filed complaint on 19.07.2018. ... (ii) monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking; Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that— (i) ... ; PROVIDED that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that— (i) it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and the man ac....
(ii) monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking: Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves ... The petitioner/sole accused is before this Court calling in question entire proceedings in Special C.No.1029 of 2024 pending before the LXX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bangalore, arising out of crime in Crime No.471 of 2023 registered for offences punishable under Sections
Based on the report of the Committee, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013 was promulgated wherein, the offence of stalking was introduced as Section 354D, which reads thus:- “354D(1)-Stalking : Whoever follows a person and contacts, or attempts to contact such person ... any other form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking: Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that— (i) it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and t....
Stalking. ... : Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that— (i) it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and the man accused of stalking had been entrusted with the responsibility of prevention and ... The petitioner has never sent any messages through his phone nor stalking respondent No.2 in any manner. The Investigating Officer also recorded the statement of LW.1 only. The allegations made in the complaint and the statement recorded before the I....
of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking: Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that— (i) it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and the man ... The petitioner has never sent any messages through his phone nor stalking respondent No.2 in any manner. The Investigating Officer also recorded the statement of LW.1 only. The allegations made in the complaint and the statement recorded before the Investigating Officer, are one and the same. ... that....
of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking: Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that— (i) it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and the man ... The petitioner has never sent any messages through his phone nor stalking respondent No.2 in any manner. The Investigating Officer also recorded the statement of LW.1 only. The allegations made in the complaint and the statement recorded before the Investigating Officer, are one and the same. ... that....
(ii) monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking: Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that: (i) ... (ii) monitors the use by a woman of the internet, e-mail or any other form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking: Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued it proves that: (i ... it was pursued for the purpose of preventing o....
(iv) Harassment and Stalking: Stalking, monitoring or excessive surveillance of the spouse, causing fear and distress. (vi) Social Isolation: Deliberately isolating the spouse from family, friends, or social support networks, leading to feelings of loneliness and exclusion. (iii) Emotional Abandonment: Neglecting the emotional needs of the spouse, showing complete indifference, or engaging in emotional detachment. (v) Constant Criticism and Ridicule: Regularly belittling or mocking the spouse ability, appearance, or character.
She overlooked many times but Arif kept on stalking her. She did not narrate her parents due to fear of consequences. Accused Arif took her phone number forcefully and used to call her from Mobile No. 9015124453.
4. Respondent No.3 has, thereafter, filed the Suit, bearing Regular Civil Suit No.1715 of 2001, in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, on 9th November 2001, simplicitor for injunction, restraining Respondent No.1 herein from disturbing his possession over the suit property. The Suit, filed by Respondent No.3, came to be dismissed on merits by the 7th Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, vide Judgment and Order dated 22nd September 2006. During pendency of the Suit, Respondent No.3 has conveyed the said property to Respondent No.2 by registered Sale De....
There is evidence on record of stalking and also of animal feeding on human flesh. 6. He submits that there have been a total of nine instances of human conflict after 18.5.2017 till 2.10.2017 and 4 have resulted in death of human beings. He reads out the impugned order to urge that it looks into efforts made to tranquilize, the locations where deaths occurred and also coordinates retrieval through GPS to note movement of tigress in area where deaths occurred at the relevant time. He submits that said order also takes note of “not finding any other tiger” in that area since....
In the said suit, an interim order was passed by the Civil Judge on 29th July, 1999 restraining Respondent No. 1 from collecting fees from vehicles, which were not crossing over the ROB.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
