Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Joint Development Agreement (JDA) & Commercial Dispute Disputes arising from JDAs are generally considered commercial disputes if they relate to agreements involving immovable property used in trade or commerce, or joint ventures for land development. Several judgments affirm that such disputes fall within the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court under Section 2(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.References: ["Mineetha C. D/o. Chandralekha Vs M/s. Sun Projects India Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"], ["Teliz Realtors vs JTL Projects Private Limited - Kerala"], ["Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, Prop. Kasliwal Construction VS Golden Dreams Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"]
Jurisdiction and the Arbitration Clause When an arbitration clause exists in a joint development or similar agreement, the Commercial Court's jurisdiction is limited if the dispute is subject to arbitration. Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, mandates that the court should reject the plaint and direct parties to arbitration if an arbitration clause exists, indicating that such disputes are not within the jurisdiction of the Civil or Commercial Court.References: ["PSM Energy Pvt. Ltd. Through its director/Authorized Representative Shri Ajay Vishwakarma vs ZAM Engineering and Logistics Pvt. Ltd. - Telangana"], ["Kiran Builders VS M. Surya Babu - Karnataka"]
Dispute Not Falling Under Commercial Dispute Definition Courts have held that disputes arising from JDAs may not always qualify as commercial disputes. For instance, if the dispute pertains to non-transactional issues or if the agreement is not yet executed, the dispute might fall outside the scope of Section 2(c).References: ["Kiran Builders VS M. Surya Babu - Karnataka"], ["KTC India Pvt. Ltd. vs Randhir Brar - Delhi"], ["Sanjay Kumar, S/o. Mahesh Narayan Sahay VS Elior India Food Services LLP, Represented by its Designate Partner/Authorized Signatory Mr. Rohit Sawhney - Karnataka"]
International Commercial Arbitration Disputes involving international commercial arbitration are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of India for appointment of arbitrators, not the Commercial Court. The scope of international commercial arbitration is defined, and disputes falling under this category are outside the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court.References: ["KTC India Pvt. Ltd. vs Randhir Brar - Delhi"]
Specific Case Laws
Courts consistently emphasize that disputes arising out of joint development agreements are considered commercial disputes if they relate to agreements involving immovable property used in trade or commerce, or joint ventures for land development. However, the presence of a valid arbitration clause generally limits the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court, requiring parties to resolve disputes through arbitration as per the arbitration clause.
Furthermore, disputes that do not meet the criteria of a commercial dispute—such as those unrelated to transactional or contractual issues, or disputes that are not yet constituted, or involve non-arbitrable issues—are not within the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court.
Key Judgements:- Disputes not qualifying as commercial disputes under Section 2(c) of the Commercial Courts Act are outside its jurisdiction.- When an arbitration clause exists, courts prefer referral to arbitration and reject jurisdiction under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act.- Disputes arising out of JDAs that involve immovable property and trade or commerce are typically within the jurisdiction unless barred by arbitration or other legal provisions.
References:- ["Mineetha C. D/o. Chandralekha Vs M/s. Sun Projects India Pvt. Ltd. - Kerala"], ["Kiran Builders VS M. Surya Babu - Karnataka"], ["KTC India Pvt. Ltd. vs Randhir Brar - Delhi"], ["PSM Energy Pvt. Ltd. Through its director/Authorized Representative Shri Ajay Vishwakarma vs ZAM Engineering and Logistics Pvt. Ltd. - Telangana"], ["Teliz Realtors vs JTL Projects Private Limited - Kerala"], ["Samiah International Builders Ltd. vs Green View-II Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. - Allahabad"], ["A. Ramesh VS Greenchoice Construction Company Private Ltd. , Chennai - Madras"], ["Sanjay Kumar, S/o. Mahesh Narayan Sahay VS Elior India Food Services LLP, Represented by its Designate Partner/Authorized Signatory Mr. Rohit Sawhney - Karnataka"], ["Mamta Kapoor VS Vinod Kumar Rai - Allahabad"], ["Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, Prop. Kasliwal Construction VS Golden Dreams Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"]
In the dynamic world of real estate development in India, Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) are commonplace. These agreements often lead to disputes over property rights, development delays, or profit sharing. A frequent question arises: Find out the Judgements that Show that a Dispute Arising out of a Joint Development Agreement or those Relating to the Arbitration Act do Not Fall into the Jurisdiction of the Commercial Court. Understanding this is crucial for developers, landowners, and investors to choose the right forum for resolution. This post delves into pivotal judgments and legal principles under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, highlighting when such disputes typically bypass Commercial Courts. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
While Commercial Courts aim for speedy resolution of high-value commercial matters, their jurisdiction is strictly defined. Missteps in forum selection can delay proceedings significantly. Let's break it down.
The cornerstone is Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which defines a commercial dispute. Relevant here is clause (vii): disputes arising out of agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce. Courts emphasize that the property must be actually used exclusively in trade or commerce at the relevant time—not merely intended, planned, or potentially used. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
The term 'used' in this context connotes actually used, and not ready for use, likely to be used, or to be used. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588 This strict interpretation ensures only genuine commercial disputes qualify, excluding many JDA cases where land remains undeveloped or agricultural. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
Jurisdiction also requires the dispute's specified value to exceed ₹1 crore, but the use criterion is often decisive. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
A landmark ruling clarifies that absent evidence of exclusive commercial use, JDA disputes fall to civil courts. The court held: The absence of record evidence showing such exclusive use at the relevant time leads to the conclusion that the dispute falls outside the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
In JDA scenarios, properties are typically raw land handed over for future development. Without proof of current trade/commerce use (e.g., no shops, offices, or factories operating), Commercial Courts lack jurisdiction. This aligns with the Act's object for expeditious disposal but only for fitting disputes. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
Many JDAs include arbitration clauses, invoking the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, Commercial Courts handle arbitration matters (e.g., Section 9 applications) only if the underlying dispute is commercial. Rights in rem—like ownership or title disputes—are generally non-arbitrable and stay with civil courts. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
Disputes related to rights in rem (ownership, title) generally are not arbitrable and are within the jurisdiction of courts, not arbitration. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588 Thus, even with an arbitration clause stating Any dispute or differences arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be referred for arbitration, courts may decline if non-arbitrable issues dominate. Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. VS Assam Vegetable & Oil Products Ltd. - 2021 Supreme(Gau) 390
The Commercial Courts Act prevails over earlier laws in conflicts, prioritizing its jurisdictional framework. Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. VS Registrar (General), Orissa High Court, Cuttack - 2022 8 Supreme 464
Not all property disputes evade Commercial Courts. Nuance arises with specific agreement types or proven use:
Joint Venture Agreements (JVAs): Under Section 2(1)(c)(xi), JVA disputes are commercial per se, without needing land use proof. According to Section 2(1)(c)(xi) of the Act, 2015, a dispute arising out of a ‘joint venture agreement’ is a commercial dispute. P. Siva Mohan Reddy, S/o. late P. Venkata Reddy VS K. R. K. Reddy, S/o. Late K. Veera Reddy - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 21 In one case, a JVA for land development (no prior use required) vested jurisdiction in Commercial Court, dismissing challenges. Commercial Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute flowing out of ‘joint venture agreement’. P. Siva Mohan Reddy, S/o. late P. Venkata Reddy VS K. R. K. Reddy, S/o. Late K. Veera Reddy - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 21
Property Already in Commercial Use: If land hosts operating businesses, jurisdiction attaches. It is seen that suit schedule land was already ‘put to use’ / ‘used’ for commercial purpose. Apartments are constructed. Kamadhenu Enterprises VS Zara Ahmad, w/o. Zaki Ahmed - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 321 Similarly, lease disputes over eco-tourism sites used commercially qualified: Thus, a dispute arising out of agreement relating to a property is a commercial dispute, if such immovable property is used exclusively for trade or commerce. Telangana State Tourism Development Corporation Limited VS A. A. Avocations Pvt. Ltd. - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 267Telangana State Tourism Development Corporation Limited VS A. A. Avocations Pvt. Ltd. - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 300
These cases underscore: JDAs mimicking JVAs or involving active use may attract jurisdiction, but pure development agreements on unused land do not. P. Siva Mohan Reddy, S/o. late P. Venkata Reddy VS K. R. K. Reddy, S/o. Late K. Veera Reddy - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 21Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
| Factor | Commercial Court Jurisdiction? | Example Citation ||--------|-------------------------------|------------------|| JDA on unused land | No | Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588 || JVA (no use needed) | Yes | P. Siva Mohan Reddy, S/o. late P. Venkata Reddy VS K. R. K. Reddy, S/o. Late K. Veera Reddy - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 21 || Leased commercial property | Yes | Kamadhenu Enterprises VS Zara Ahmad, w/o. Zaki Ahmed - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 321 || Rights in rem | No (Civil Court) | Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588 |
To navigate this:- Document Use: Record evidence of property's trade/commerce use pre-dispute.- Draft Precisely: In JDAs, clarify if it's a JVA under Section 2(1)(c)(xi) or specify use.- Forum Check: Assess used exclusively and arbitrability before filing.- Seek Advice: Consult counsel early; prefer civil courts for title/ownership issues.
Parties should clearly establish and document the actual use of the immovable property in trade or commerce at the relevant time to invoke Commercial Court jurisdiction. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588
Judgments like those in Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. VS K. S. Infraspace LLP - 2019 8 Supreme 588 firmly exclude many JDA and arbitration-linked disputes from Commercial Courts unless immovable property meets the rigorous used exclusively in trade or commerce test. While JVAs or active-use cases differ P. Siva Mohan Reddy, S/o. late P. Venkata Reddy VS K. R. K. Reddy, S/o. Late K. Veera Reddy - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 21Kamadhenu Enterprises VS Zara Ahmad, w/o. Zaki Ahmed - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 321, the principle demands strict compliance. This framework promotes efficiency but protects against overreach.
This post provides general insights based on cited judgments and is not legal advice. Laws evolve; consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The subject matter of the suit is based on a joint development agreement entered between the parties on 15.7.2013, wherein there is an arbitration clause. ... The plaintiffs submitted that in view of the enactment of the Commercial Courts Act, the Commercial Court alone is empowered to adjudicate commercial disputes. They pleaded that....
and this Court has clearly held that a dispute arising out of a Joint Development Agreement will not answer to the definition of the "Commercial Dispute" as defined in the Act. ... disputes arising out of such Joint Development Agreement #HL_STAR....
Definitions.— (1) In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,— (f) “international commercial arbitration” means an arbitration relating to disputes arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial under the law in force in India and where at least one ... It is not disputed that the jurisdictio....
Section 8 of the Act, the Commercial Court ought to have rejected the plaint and directed the plaintiff to invoke the proceedings under the Act by virtue of specific arbitration clause enumerated in the joint venture agreement dated 21.02.2020 and the Commercial Court is not having ... Commercial #....
The above referred provisions under the commercial Court Acts clearly shows that, the dispute arise out of a joint venture agreement is a commercial dispute u/s. 2(c) (xi). ... Hence this Court has no jurisdiction, and the case is to be transferred u/s.15 of the Commercial Disputes Act. ... The said....
jurisdiction over all matters arising out of or relating to the said contract. ... Arbitration Act. ... Regarding the fact that application under Section 9 of the Act was filed before the Delhi High Court with averments pertaining to territorial jurisdiction, it was submitted that the application was withdrawn even before it was registered and therefor....
b) Since the other flat owners have not given consentfor arbitration, the dispute raised by the petitionerarising out of the Joint Development Agreementdated 07.03.2011, is not an arbitrable dispute. ... 16 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act by the respondent, questioning the jurisdiction of theArb....
Commercial dispute is also defined under the 2015 Act. In terms of Section 2(1)(c)(i) thereof the Commercial Court does not get jurisdiction to entertain a challenge to the order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal as it is not a commercial dispute. ... Considering Section 2(c)(vii), “commercial #HL_STA....
Therefore, if the dispute falls within any of the clause 2(c) the dispute can be said to be “commercial dispute” for which the Commercial Court would have jurisdiction. ... be applicable and therefore, the Commercial Court would have jurisdiction. ... Clause (c) defines the “commercial dis....
The clause xi of Section 2 (1) (c) of the Commercial Courts Act deals with Joint Venture Agreements. Section 2 (1) (c) specifically start with the words “Dispute arising out of”. In the facts of present case, the Joint Venture is not yet constituted. ... Section 6 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, uses words ‘shall’ have j....
If there is a dispute flowing out of Section 2(1)(c)(xi) of the Act, 2015, the Commercial Court alone has jurisdiction to adjudicate. The definition is exhaustive and includes all ‘Joint Venture Agreements’ without any exception. 13. According to Section 2(1)(c)(xi) of the Act, 2015, a dispute arising out of a ‘joint venture agreement’ is a commercial dispute.
Thus, a dispute arising out of agreement relating to a property is a commercial dispute, if such immovable property is used exclusively for trade or commerce. In so far as this case is concerned, ‘commercial dispute’ means a dispute arising out of agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce [Section 2(1)(c)(vii)[ Section 2. Definitions.— (1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, –– (a) & (b) xxx (c) “commercial dispute” means ....
In so far as this case is concerned, ‘commercial dispute’ means a dispute arising out of agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce [Section 2 (1) (c) (vii)]. Thus, a dispute arising out of agreement relating to a property is a commercial dispute, if such immovable property is used exclusively for trade or commerce.
Thus, a dispute arising out of agreement relating to a property is a commercial dispute, if such immovable property is used exclusively for trade or commerce. In so far as this case is concerned, ‘commercial dispute’ means a dispute arising out of agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce [Section 2 (1) ( c) (vii)].
The arbitration clause itself mentions that “Any dispute or differences arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be ............... referred for arbitration.......” But if this Court proceeds to undertake the exercise, it would virtually negate the speedy and expeditious resolution of the disputes. On minute examination of the claims and counter claims it may ultimately be shown that some of the claims may actually be outside the scope of the agreement. All these cl....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
