SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1076

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, JJ.
Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Registrar (General), Orissa High Court, Cuttack & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6876 of 2022 with Civil Appeal No. 6878 of 2022 with Civil Appeal No. 6877 of 2022
Decided On : 19-10-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR

IMPORTANT POINT
Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts – All applications or appeals arising out of arbitration under provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, other than international commercial arbitration, shall be filed in and heard and disposed of by Commercial Courts, exercising territorial jurisdiction over such arbitration where such commercial courts have been constituted – There cannot be two Fora with respect to different commercial disputes.

Headnote:

Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – Sections 3, 10, 15 and 21 – Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 9, 14 and 34 read with Section 2(1)(e) – Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts – As per settled position of law, it is to be presumed that while enacting subsequent law, legislature is conscious of provisions of Act prior in time and later Act shall prevail – Considering provisions of Act, 2015 and Objects and Reasons for which Act, 2015 has been enacted and Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division in High Courts are established for speedy disposal of commercial disputes including arbitration disputes, Sections 3 and 10 of Act, 2015 shall prevail and all applications or appeals arising out of arbitration under provisions of Act, 1996, other than international commercial arbitration, shall be filed in and heard and disposed of by Commercial Courts, exercising territorial jurisdiction over such arbitration where such commercial courts have been constituted – There cannot be two Fora with respect to different commercial disputes. (Para 11)

Facts of the case:

Question of law arising for consideration in present appeal is, whether in exercise of powers under Section 3 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the State Government can confer jurisdiction to hear applications under Sections 9, 14 and 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon Commercial Courts which are subordinate to the rank of the Principal Civil Judge in the District, contrary to the provisions of Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act?

Findings of Court:

Notification issued by State of Odisha issued in consultation with High Court of Orissa to confer jurisdiction upon the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) designated as Commercial Court to decide applications or appeals arising out of arbitration under provisions of Act, 1996 cannot be said to be illegal and bad in law. On the contrary, same can be said to be absolutely in consonance with Sections 3 & 10 of Act, 2015.

Result : Appeals dismissed.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - Arbitration disputes other than international commercial arbitration must be filed in Commercial Courts exercising territorial jurisdiction (!) . - State Government may constitute Commercial Courts at the level of Civil Judge (Senior Division) designated as Commercial Courts with High Court consultation (!) (!) . - The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is the later statute and prevails over the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (!) (!) .

What is the jurisdiction of Commercial Courts over arbitration disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?

Can the State Government confer jurisdiction on Commercial Courts subordinate to the Principal Civil Judge to handle arbitration applications?

Do the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 prevail over the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in case of conflict?


JUDGMENT

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 12.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in respective writ petitions, by which, the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the respective writ petitions in which the appellants herein – original writ petitioners challenged a notification dated 13.11.2020, issued by the State of Odisha through its Principal Secretary, Law Department in establishing the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) as Commercial Courts for the purposes of exercising jurisdiction and powers under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the original writ petitioners have preferred the present appeals.

2. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 and sub-section (1) of Section 9 read with Section 10 of the Odisha Civil Courts Act, 1984 and Section 30 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 2015), the State Government on the recommendation of and after consultation with the High Court of Orissa has established the Courts of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as Commercial Courts for the purposes of exercising the jurisdiction and powers under the Act, 2015.

2.1 The original writ petitioners – appellants herein initially filed the proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act, 1996) in the Court of learned District Judge. However, on establishment of the Commercial Courts under the aforesaid notification, the said proceedings were transferred to the Commercial Court i.e., the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) [designated as Commercial Court]. Therefore, the appellants herein challenged the aforesaid notification and designating the Courts of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as Commercial Courts under the Act, 2015 before the High Court by way of present writ petitions. It was the case on behalf of the appellants – original writ petitioners that constituting and/or designating the Courts of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as Commercial Courts and to exercise the powers under the Commercial Courts Act would be in conflict with the provisions of Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act, 1996. It was the case on behalf of the appellants herein that under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, only the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district (Court of Principal District Judge) shall be the “Court” for the purpose of deciding the disputes under the Arbitration Act, 1996 and in case of an arbitration it does not include any Civil Court of a grade inferior to such Principal District Judge. Therefore, it was the case on behalf of the appellants that to confer the jurisdiction upon the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) to exercise the powers under the Commercial Courts Act including the proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1996 would be contrary to Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, which is the Special Act. By the impugned common judgment and order the High Court has dismissed the said writ petitions which has given rise to the present appeals.

3. Ms. Uttara Babbar, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the respective appellants – original writ petitioners and Shri Gaurav Aggarwal, learned counsel has appeared as Amicus Curiae appointed by the Court.

3.1 Ms. Babbar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has vehemently submitted that there is a conflict between Section 3 of the Act, 2015 and Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act, 1996. It is submitted that Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 provides that the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district shall be the “Court” in the case of an arbitration other than international commercial arbitration. It is submitted that Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 specifically provides that it does not include any Civil Court of a grade inferior to such Principal Civil Court. It is submitted that


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top