Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Easement of Necessity - An easement that arises when a transfer or bequest of immovable property makes it necessary for the enjoyment of the transferred property or for enjoying other immovable property of the transferor/testator. It can be created explicitly or implied by necessity, and is typically extinguished if the necessity ceases. Bommalingaiah, S/o Late Shivanna vs Sadashivappa, S/o Bommalingaiah - Karnataka, Padma vs Manickam - Madras, Panangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala, Rishi Petrochem Private Limited VS Dipen Prahladbhai Patel - Gujarat, Rajkumar VS Academy of Maritime Education and Training - Madras, R.V. Ganesha Bhatta, S/O Late Venkataramana Bhatta vs State Bank Of Mysore - Karnataka, K. Ramasamy vs K. Ramasamy, [Died] - Madras, M M Plastoware India Pvt. Ltd. VS Umeshbhai Bhanabhai Patel - Gujarat
Quasi-Easement - A type of easement characterized by being apparent and continuous, and necessary for the enjoyment of the dominant tenement as it was at the time of severance from the servient tenement. Unlike easements of necessity, quasi-easements do not extinguish if the necessity disappears. They are recognized under Section 13(d) of the Indian Easements Act, and their main feature is that they do not require absolute necessity but are based on apparent and continuous use. Padma vs Manickam - Madras, Panangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala, PANANGOTTUM THAREMMAL SARA vs P.T.KUTTIALY - Kerala, PANANGOTTUM THAREMMAL SARA vs P.T.KUTTIALY - Kerala, Rishi Petrochem Private Limited VS Dipen Prahladbhai Patel - Gujarat, Rajkumar VS Academy of Maritime Education and Training - Madras, R.V. Ganesha Bhatta, S/O Late Venkataramana Bhatta vs State Bank Of Mysore - Karnataka, K. Ramasamy vs K. Ramasamy, [Died] - Madras, M M Plastoware India Pvt. Ltd. VS Umeshbhai Bhanabhai Patel - Gujarat
Differences:
Legal Basis: Both are governed under Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, but they differ in their implications and creation mechanisms.
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- Indian Easements Act, Sections 8, 9, 13 Bommalingaiah, S/o Late Shivanna vs Sadashivappa, S/o Bommalingaiah - Karnataka, Padma vs Manickam - Madras, Panangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala, PANANGOTTUM THAREMMAL SARA vs P.T.KUTTIALY - Kerala, PANANGOTTUM THAREMMAL SARA vs P.T.KUTTIALY - Kerala, Rishi Petrochem Private Limited VS Dipen Prahladbhai Patel - Gujarat, Rajkumar VS Academy of Maritime Education and Training - Madras, R.V. Ganesha Bhatta, S/O Late Venkataramana Bhatta vs State Bank Of Mysore - Karnataka, K. Ramasamy vs K. Ramasamy, [Died] - Madras, M M Plastoware India Pvt. Ltd. VS Umeshbhai Bhanabhai Patel - Gujarat- Case law: Narayanan Namboodiripad (1990 KHC 215) clarifies that quasi-easements do not get extinguished upon cessation of necessity.
In the realm of property law, understanding rights over neighboring lands is crucial for homeowners, developers, and investors. A common question arises: What is the difference between easement and quasi-easement? These concepts, governed primarily by the Indian Easements Act, 1882, can significantly impact property use and value. While both involve privileges over another's land, they differ in origin, requirements, and duration.
This article breaks down these distinctions, drawing from legal definitions, case insights, and statutory provisions. Note that this is general information and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
An easement is fundamentally a right annexed to a parcel of land (known as the dominant tenement) that allows its owner to use the neighboring servient tenement in a prescribed way, without taking soil or produce from it. As defined in Section 4 of the Easements Act: An easement is a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, as such, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own. Batukbhai Gopalbhai Patel VS Ravjibhai Bhangad Ukabhai Rathod - Current Civil Cases
Easements are privileges without profit and cannot coexist with full ownership in the same person. Batukbhai Gopalbhai Patel VS Ravjibhai Bhangad Ukabhai Rathod - Current Civil Cases They include types like easements of necessity, which are vital for enjoying the dominant land. Kuruvilla Joseph (Minor) VS Devagiri Plantation Ltd. , Rep. by its Managing Director, Kanyakumari - Madras (2021) For instance, a right of way might be implied when land is sold landlocked. Bommalingaiah, S/o Late Shivanna vs Sadashivappa, S/o Bommalingaiah - Karnataka
Easements can arise through:- Express grant- Prescription (long continuous use) under Section 15 Sudhakar Bhat VS Bhaskara Achari - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 2082 - 2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 2082- Necessity under Section 13 Sudhakar Bhat VS Bhaskara Achari - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 2082 - 2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 2082
A quasi-easement emerges during a period of single ownership when the owner enjoys a privilege over part of their own property that benefits another part. Upon dividing the property (severance), this privilege may become a quasi-easement for the new dominant owner's benefit. Panangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala (2022)Ramaswami VS Muniswami and others - Madras (1959)
Quasi-easements must be apparent (visible or discoverable upon inspection), continuous (no human intervention needed for exercise), and necessary for enjoying the dominant tenement as it was before severance. Ibrahimkutty VS Abdul Rahumankunju - Kerala (1992)K. Kalianna Gounder, S/o. Kaithamali Gounder VS Sundararaj, S/o. Petchimuthu - Madras (2019)Gopalbhai Jikabhai Suvagiya VS Vinubhai Nathabhai Hirani - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 924 - 2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 924
As explained: Quasi easement must be (a) apparent (b) continuous and (c) necessary for enjoying the dominant heritage as it was enjoyed before severance. Gopalbhai Jikabhai Suvagiya VS Vinubhai Nathabhai Hirani - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 924 - 2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 924 They are not easements of absolute necessity but presumed grants post-severance. Gopalbhai Jikabhai Suvagiya VS Vinubhai Nathabhai Hirani - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 924 - 2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 924
Under Section 13(d) of the Act, quasi-easements are recognized distinctly from pure necessity easements. Padma vs Manickam - MadrasPanangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala (2022)
While both facilitate land use, their distinctions are pivotal:
Quasi-Easement: Arises from prior enjoyment under common ownership, implied upon severance. Panangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala (2022)Ramaswami VS Muniswami and others - Madras (1959)
Degree of Necessity:
Quasi-Easement: Qualified necessity; it enhances enjoyment as previously used, not strictly essential. R. Ram Mohan VS Narayanan Namboodiripad - Kerala (1989)Ramaswami VS Muniswami and others - Madras (1959)
Conditions for Existence:
Quasi-Easement: Strictly apparent, continuous, and tied to pre-severance necessity. Ibrahimkutty VS Abdul Rahumankunju - Kerala (1992)Ramaswami VS Muniswami and others - Madras (1959)
Extinguishment:
| Aspect | Easement of Necessity | Quasi-Easement ||-----------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|| Creation | Transfer implying absolute need | Severance after apparent, continuous use|| Necessity | Absolute | Qualified (pre-severance enjoyment) || Apparent/Continuous | Not required | Mandatory || Duration | Ends with necessity | Continues post-necessity |
These differences stem from Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, which addresses both. Sudhakar Bhat VS Bhaskara Achari - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 2082 - 2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 2082Rishi Petrochem Private Limited VS Dipen Prahladbhai Patel - Gujarat
Consider a landowner dividing their estate: A pathway used continuously across what becomes the servient plot could imply a quasi-easement if visible and routine before sale. Conversely, selling a backland parcel without access creates an easement of necessity. Rajkumar VS Academy of Maritime Education and Training - Madras
Ownership and easement rights are inconsistent—full ownership precludes easements. Batukbhai Gopalbhai Patel VS Ravjibhai Bhangad Ukabhai Rathod - Current Civil Cases Evidence of prior use is key for quasi-easements, while strict need proves necessity easements. [K. Ramasamy vs K. Ramasamy, [Died] - Madras](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/INDMAD00000219989)
In disputes, courts examine:- Historical use (for quasi) PANANGOTTUM THAREMMAL SARA vs P.T.KUTTIALY - Kerala- Current indispensability (for necessity) R.V. Ganesha Bhatta, S/O Late Venkataramana Bhatta vs State Bank Of Mysore - Karnataka
Sections 8 and 9 outline general easement rights, while Section 13 specifies necessity and quasi-easements. Bommalingaiah, S/o Late Shivanna vs Sadashivappa, S/o Bommalingaiah - Karnataka Prescription under Section 15 offers another acquisition route. Sudhakar Bhat VS Bhaskara Achari - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 2082 - 2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 2082
The term quasi easement has been applied to those easements which are not easement of absolute necessity but which come into existence for the first time by presumed grant on severance... Gopalbhai Jikabhai Suvagiya VS Vinubhai Nathabhai Hirani - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 924 - 2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 924
Easements and quasi-easements both safeguard property enjoyment but diverge in formality and resilience. Easements demand rigorous necessity and may fade, while quasi-easements endure via apparent continuity.
Key Takeaways:- Document grants for easements.- Prove pre-severance use for quasi-easements.- Reference Sections 4, 13, and 15 of the Easements Act.
For tailored advice, engage a property lawyer. Understanding these nuances prevents disputes and protects investments.
References: Cristina Marques VS Lily Dias @ Lilia Dias Toscano @ Lily Dias Toscano - Bombay (2021)Batukbhai Gopalbhai Patel VS Ravjibhai Bhangad Ukabhai Rathod - Gujarat (2021)Kuruvilla Joseph (Minor) VS Devagiri Plantation Ltd. , Rep. by its Managing Director, Kanyakumari - Madras (2021)Panangottum Tharemmal Sara, D/o. Kunhisooppy VS P. T. Kuttialy, S/o Abdulla - Kerala (2022)Ramaswami VS Muniswami and others - Madras (1959)Ibrahimkutty VS Abdul Rahumankunju - Kerala (1992)R. Ram Mohan VS Narayanan Namboodiripad - Kerala (1989)Malati Muduli VS Rebati Bhoi - Orissa (2017)K. Kalianna Gounder, S/o. Kaithamali Gounder VS Sundararaj, S/o. Petchimuthu - Madras (2019)Batukbhai Gopalbhai Patel VS Ravjibhai Bhangad Ukabhai Rathod - Current Civil CasesSudhakar Bhat VS Bhaskara Achari - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 2082 - 2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 2082Gopalbhai Jikabhai Suvagiya VS Vinubhai Nathabhai Hirani - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 924 - 2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 924Bommalingaiah, S/o Late Shivanna vs Sadashivappa, S/o Bommalingaiah - KarnatakaPadma vs Manickam - Madras
#EasementLaw, #QuasiEasement, #PropertyRightsIndia
Easements of necessity and quasi-easements Where one person transfers or bequeaths immovable property to another, (a) if an easement in other immovable property of the transferor or testator is necessary for enjoying the subject of the transfer or bequest, the transferee or legatee shall be ... The easements mentioned in this section, clauses (a), (c) and (e), are called easements of nec....
Easement of necessity and quasi easement are dealt with in Section 13 of the Act. The grant may be express or even by necessary implication. ... Easement of necessity and quasi-easement are dealt with in Section 13 of the Act. The grant may be expressed or even by necessary implication. ... For better appreciation Section 8 and 9 of the EASEMENTS ACT are extracted b....
The claim of the plaintiff is based on a right acquired as quasi-easement as provided under Section 13 (d) of the Indian Easements Act,1882. ... The First Appellate Court has held that there was no sufÏcient pleading in the plaint to claim quasi-easement. This Court has carefully gone through the pleadings in the plaint. All the ingredients of quasi-easements, as defin....
The claim of the plaintiff is based on a right acquired as quasi-easement as provided under Section 13 (d) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882. Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act reads thus:- “13. ... The First Appellate Court has held that there was no sufficient pleading in the plaint to claim quasi-easement. This Court has carefully gone through the pleadings in the plaint. All the ....
The claim of the plaintiff is based on a right acquired as quasi-easement as provided under Section 13 (d) of the Indian Easements Act,1882. ... The First Appellate Court has held that there was no sufÏcient pleading in the plaint to claim quasi-easement. This Court has carefully gone through the pleadings in the plaint. All the ingredients of quasi-easements, as defin....
Easements of necessity and quasi easements - Where one person transfers or bequeaths immovable property to another: (a) if an easement in other immovable property of the transferor or testator is necessary for enjoying the subject of the transfer or bequest, the transferee or legatee ... Easement of necessity and quasi-easement are dealt with in Section 13 of the Act. T....
He would also invite my attention to Section 13 of Easements Act, 1882 which relates to easement of necessity. Section 13 of the Easements Act, 1882 is extracted hereunder: “13. Easements of necessity and quasi-easements. ... (c) if an easement in the subject of the transfer or bequest is necessary for enjoying other immovable property of the transferer or testator, t....
Whereas plaintiff claimed easement by prescription, necessity as well as mamul right over that pathway. 17. Right of easement is creation of the Indian EASEMENTS ACT , 1882. Section 13 of the said Act deals with easement of necessity and quasi easements. ... Easements can be acquired by different ways and are of different kinds, that is, easement by gr....
Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 reads as follows: “Section 13- Easements of necessity and quasi easements. ... It is relevant to read Section 13(e) and (f) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 (Easements Act, hereafter) deals with the creation of Easements of necessity and quasi easements at the time of partitioning join....
Who may impose easements.—An easement may be imposed by any one in the circumstances, and to the extent, in and to which he may transfer his interest in the heritage on which the liability is to be imposed. 13. Easements of necessity and quasi easements. ... Easement of necessity and quasi-easement are dealt with in Section 13 of the Act. The grant may....
Section 4 of the Easements Act defines 'Easement' as follows : Ownership and easement right are inconsistent and cannot coexist in the same person. "An easement is a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, as such, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own." An easement is a privilege, without profit....
Section 4 of the Easements Act defines ‘Easement’ as follows : “An easement is a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, as such, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own.” Ownership and easement right are inconsistent and cannot coexist in the same person. An easement is a privilege, without profit....
Right of easement is creation of the Indian Easements Act, 1882. Section 15 of the Act deals with acquisition of easement by prescription. Section 13 of the said Act deals with easement of necessity and quasi easements.
Quasi easement must be (a) apparent (b) continuous and (c) necessary for enjoying the dominant heritage as it was enjoyed before severance. The term quasi easement has been applied to those easements which are not easement of absolute necessity but which come into existence for the first time by presumed grant on severance of two or more tenement formerly united into the sole ownership of one person. By quasi necessity, when there is a severance of two tenements (section 13) ....
Where an easement of necessity is claimed, it is for the claimant to establish that the demise would be utilized for the easement. Easement of necessity and quasi-easement find place in section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, 1982 (in short called ‘the Act”).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
