Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Judicial Precedent - Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Canara Bank (2021 SCC 537): The Supreme Court clarified that a sale certificate issued by an authorized officer under the SARFAESI Act is not a document that requires compulsory registration under Section 17(2)(xii) of the Registration Act, 1908. The Court emphasized that such sale certificates are not instruments of the kind mentioned in clause (b) of Section 17 of Act III of 1877 and are not registrable ["Mr.Y.Mohamed Abubakkar vs The Inspector General of - Madras"] ["Trinity Colour India (P) Lim vs The Inspector General of Reg - Madras"] ["N.JEYALAKSHMI vs THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REG - Madras"].
Main Points and Insights:
The judgment reiterates that the law mandates only the handover of a duly validated sale certificate to the auction purchaser, with no requirement for stamp duty or registration ["Mr.Y.Mohamed Abubakkar vs The Inspector General of - Madras"] ["N.JEYALAKSHMI vs THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REG - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Mr.Y.Mohamed Abubakkar vs The Inspector General of - Madras"]- ["Trinity Colour India (P) Lim vs The Inspector General of Reg - Madras"]- ["N.JEYALAKSHMI vs THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REG - Madras"]
In the complex world of banking recovery and property auctions, questions often arise about the validity and formalities of sale certificates issued under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). A pivotal case, Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Canara Bank, has provided clarity on whether these certificates require stamp duty or formal registration. This ruling has significant implications for auction purchasers, banks, and registering authorities.
If you're wondering about Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v Canara Bank and its impact on property transfers from SARFAESI auctions, this post breaks it down. We'll explore the Supreme Court's findings, supporting judicial precedents, and practical takeaways. Note: This is general information based on judicial decisions and not specific legal advice—consult a lawyer for your situation.
The case centered on a sale certificate issued after a public auction under the SARFAESI Act. The key dispute: Does this certificate need stamp duty payment or compulsory registration under the Registration Act, 1908, and Indian Stamp Act, 1899? Or is simply forwarding a validated copy to the registering authority under Section 89(4) sufficient? Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714
The Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, (2021) 11 SCC 537, settled this decisively. It held that Sections 17(2)(xii) and 89(4) of the Registration Act only require the authorized officer to hand over the validated sale certificate to the purchaser and forward a copy to the registering authorities for filing in Book I. This filing has the same effect as registration and eliminates the need for further formalities or stamp duty. Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. VS Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1768
The Court emphasized that such sale certificates are evidence of transfer but not conveyances or instruments requiring stamp duty, a position settled in law for over 150 years. Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714
Sale certificates under SARFAESI auctions are not compulsorily registrable instruments. Forwarding the validated copy under Section 89(4) suffices, giving it equivalent legal effect to full registration. N. C. Suresh Kumar VS Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Foreshore Estate, Chennai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2465Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. VS Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1768
As the Supreme Court clarified: We are of the view that the mandate of law in terms of Section 17(2)(xii) read with Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908 only required the Authorized Officer of the Bank under the SARFAESI Act... SKG Merchandise P. Ltd. VS Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 3140
These certificates do not attract stamp duty when used solely as proof of title transfer. Stamp duty applies only if presented as a conveyance for other purposes, like sale or mortgage outside SARFAESI. Articles 18 and 23 of the Stamp Act confirm this nuance. Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. VS Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1768State of Punjab VS Ferrous Alloy Forgings P Ltd. - 2025 3 Supreme 43
Subsequent rulings reinforce this. For instance, courts have noted that prior decisions like Prakash Chand Jain are no longer good law post-Esjaypee. From the above discussion, it could be seen that in view of the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v.... Prakash Chand Jain, (Division Bench) are no longer good law... M/s.Panindia Tubes Pvt Ltd. vs The Inspector General of Reg - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3214Bell Tower Enterprises LLP vs The State of Tamil Nadu - 2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18533The Inspector General of Registration vs Ashwin Exim India Private Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55477
The purpose of forwarding is to record the transfer in the registrar's Book I, without creating or extinguishing title independently. Registering authorities must accept this filing without demanding extra fees. Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714N. C. Suresh Kumar VS Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Foreshore Estate, Chennai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2465
In one writ petition, the court directed: Second respondent is directed to file a copy of sale certificate in Book register as contemplated under Section 89(4) of Registration Act within a period of two weeks... SKG Merchandise P. Ltd. VS Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 3140
The Esjaypee ruling has been consistently followed. In SLP(C) No.16949 of 2022, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that validated and forwarded certificates need no further action. Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714N. C. Suresh Kumar VS Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Foreshore Estate, Chennai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2465
High Courts echo this:- Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the issue raised in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in Esjaypee Impex Private Limited v. Assistant General Manager... ARUNA KASERA Vs GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ORS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7832- More so, the three judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of 2021 (11) SCC 537, reiterated the principles in the case of Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd... Chettinad Academy of Research vs The Inspector General of Reg - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 13976
Earlier cases like Masarat-un-Nissa are cited approvingly, stating a sale certificate is not an instrument of the kind mentioned in clause (b) of Section 17... and is not compulsorily registrable. ARUNA KASERA Vs GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ORS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7832MONIKA SINGH VS. LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT GNCTD & ORS. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 9512
Registering authorities lack power under Section 47A of the Stamp Act to assess stamp duty on SARFAESI sale certificates from public auctions. Public auctions are transparent, exempting them from such scrutiny. Courts have quashed demands and ordered refunds with interest. ARUNA KASERA Vs GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ORS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7832
One ruling states: The registering authority lacks power under Section 47A to assess sale certificates from public auctions. And in another: The court ruled that stamp duty on a sale certificate is 5%, and Section 47-A does not apply to public auctions conducted under court supervision. Vijayalakshmi Marketing VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 2251
In cases like Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, courts limited stamp duty to 5% and registration to 1%, following Esjaypee. Vijayalakshmi Marketing VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 2251
While generally exempt, if the certificate is used beyond evidence of transfer (e.g., as a standalone conveyance), stamp duty may apply. Always verify context. Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1714N. C. Suresh Kumar VS Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Foreshore Estate, Chennai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2465
In summary, Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v Canara Bank streamlines SARFAESI auctions, reducing burdens on buyers. For tailored advice, seek professional legal counsel. Stay informed on evolving precedents.
References:1. Supreme Court: (2021) 11 SCC 537 Inspector General of Registration VS G. Madhurambal - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 17142. Related orders: Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. VS Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1768N. C. Suresh Kumar VS Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Foreshore Estate, Chennai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 24653. High Court affirmations: M/s.Panindia Tubes Pvt Ltd. vs The Inspector General of Reg - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 3214ARUNA KASERA Vs GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ORS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7832 and others noted inline.
#SARFAESI #StampDuty #LegalRuling
Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Prakash Chand Jain, (Division Bench) are no longer good law, in view of the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara Bank. ... From the above discussion, it could be seen that in view of the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Spreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd#HL_E....
Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Prakash Chand Jain, (Division Bench) are no longer good law, in view of the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara Bank. 26. ... Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara Bank, reported in 2021 (11) SCC 537, the learned counsel would place considerable reliance on the follo....
From the above discussion, it could be seen that in view of the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Prakash Chand Jain, (Division Bench) are no longer good law, in view of the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara Bank. ... The Hon'ble Apex Court in a decision reported in Authorised Of....
However in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Unfortunately the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Prakash Chand Jain, (Division Bench) are no longer good law, in view of the pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and....
Masarat-un-Nissa1 opining that a sale certificate is not an instrument of the kind mentioned in clause (b) of Section 17 of Act III of 1877 and is not compulsorily registrable and this Court’s view in Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. ... Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the issue raised in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in Esjaypee Impex Private Limited v. Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara#....
However in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Ultimately, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. ... Impex Pvt., Ltd., case. ... Unfortunately the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v.
Prakash Chand Jain, (Division Bench) are no longer good law, in view of the pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. Assistant General Manager and Authorised Officer, Canara Bank. 26. ... From the above discussion, it could be seen that in view of the pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. ... Reference may be made to M/s.Esjaypee #HL....
Masarat-un-Nissa opining that a sale certificate is not an instrument of the kind mentioned in clause (b) of Section 17 of the Act III of 1877 and is not compulsorily registrable and this Court's view in Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. V. Asst. ... More so, the three judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of 2021 (11) SCC 537 reiterated the principles in the case of Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd., cited supra. Thus, this Court has to follo....
In support of this position in law, counsel for petitioner relies upon the following decisions: i)Esjaypee Impex (P) Ltd. v. Canara Bank, (2021) 11 SCC 537. ii) The Inspector General of Registration & Anr. v. G. ... Masarat-un- Nissa1 opining that a sale certificate is not an instrument of the kind mentioned in clause (b) of Section 17 of Act III of 1877 and is not compulsorily registrable and this Court’s view in Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd#HL....
More so, the three judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of 2021 (11) SCC 537, reiterated the principles in the case of Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd., cited supra. ... Masarat-un-Nissa opining that a sale certificate is not an instrument of the kind mentioned in clause (b) of Section 17 of the Act III of 1877 and is not compulsorily registrable and this Court's view in Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. V. Asst. ... General Manager and Au....
25. From the above discussion, it could be seen that in view of the pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Esjaypee Impex Pvt Ltd v. It would be sufficient, if the document is lodged with the Registrar under Section 89(4) to be filed by him in the Book-I maintained by him. The decisions of this Court in the Inspector General of Registration v. K.K.Thirumurugan, (Division Bench,) The Inspector General of Registration v. Kanagalakshmi Ganaguru, (Division Bench), Dr.R.. O.Ms.No.46, CT and All Department dated 27.03.2012. As already pointed out since the document would n....
The Section 89(4) contemplates only filing of the sale certificates and therefore, the question of stamp duty does not arise. In this regard, it is also relevant to rely upon the orders passed in S.L.P.Nos.29752-29754 of 2019 dated 05.01.2021 Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. General Manager and Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held as follows : We are the view that the mandate of law in terms of Section 17(2)(xii) read with Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908 only required the Authorized Officer of the Bank under the SARFAESI Act....
(ii) Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2012 SC 2925 (i) Savitri Devi v. District Judge, Gorakpur, AIR 1999 SC 976 (iii) Chet Ram V/s Brij Lal, Latest HLJ 2015 (HP) Suppl. 616
2. M/s. Esjaypee Impex Private Limited, has taken credit facility to an aggregate limit of Rs. 39.50 Crores, from Canara Bank, Chennai. land and building bearing Old No. 23, New No. 2, Ormes Road, Rajarathinam Street, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010, as security. Mrs. Madhubala Parmar, wife of Mr. Mahendra Kumar Parmar, one of the Directors also stood as guarantor and offered a property viz.
1. AIR 1997 DELHI 355 (Cofex Exports Ltd. v. Canara Bank) R.C. Lahoti and S.N. Kapur, JJ. 3. CDJ 1933 AH HC 007 - Madan Mohan Garg v. Bohra Ram Lal. 2. CDJ 1954 APHC 043 - D. Konda Pentiah v. Chenchu Rangiah. Cofex Exports Ltd., Appellant v. Canara Bank, Respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
