Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
The invocation of the guarantee (e.g., demand notice) is a necessary step for the debt to become due against the guarantor; until then, the guarantor may not have a liability, and requesting release without such invocation does not affect the contractual obligations unless the guarantee is formally discharged ["Bank of Baroda VS K Srinivasa Reddy - National Company Law Tribunal"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["VINEET SARAF Vs REC LTD. - Delhi"]- ["Canara Bank VS Shri Thota Kanna Rao - National Company Law Tribunal"]- ["B. Alphonse Ligory VS Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by its Chief Manager, Thoothukudi - Madras"]- ["Bank of Baroda VS K Srinivasa Reddy - National Company Law Tribunal"]- ["Small Industries Development Bank of India VS Ramilaben Ashwin Patel - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1119"]- ["State Bank of India vs Ashok Rajpal - National Company Law Tribunal"]- ["Bank of Baroda VS M.Srinivasa Babji - National Company Law Tribunal"]
In the world of business loans and credit facilities, personal guarantees are a common requirement. But what happens when a guarantor wants out? Many wonder: can a guarantor ask for release of his personal guarantee without seeking cancellation of contract? The short answer is yes—typically for continuing guarantees—thanks to Section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This allows revocation for future transactions via simple notice, without touching the underlying agreement between the principal debtor and creditor. Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254H. R. BASAVARAJ VS CANARA BANK - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1685
This post breaks down the legal mechanics, requirements, pitfalls, and real-world insights from cases. While this provides general guidance, consult a legal professional for your specific situation.
A continuing guarantee extends to a series of transactions, unlike a single-transaction guarantee (Section 129, Indian Contract Act). Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254 These are prevalent in banking, such as personal guarantees for ongoing credit lines.
Key feature: A continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety, as to future transactions, by notice to the creditor. Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254H. R. BASAVARAJ VS CANARA BANK - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1685Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690 This statutory right is unilateral—no need for debtor or creditor consent, and it doesn't affect the principal contract.
The guarantee acts as a separate, independent obligation. It remains enforceable for transactions before notice receipt but stops prospectively. For instance, guarantee deeds often include: THIS GUARANTEE shall be continuing security binding me/us ... until the receipt by the Bank of notice in writing to discontinue it ... and if discontinued by notice this Guarantee shall nevertheless ... continue to be available ... for and shall extend to all indebtedness and liabilities of the Principal to the Bank at the date of the receipt of such notice. Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690
Revocation demands precision:- Clear written notice: Must explicitly invoke Section 130 and target future transactions only. Informal letters requesting withdrawal or past liability discharge won't suffice. In one case, letters saying this request be treated as prior intimation for withdrawal of guarantee and In future, we shall not be bound to sign any documents pertaining to renewal/enhancement were rejected: it is not a revocation of Bank Guarantee either under the guarantee deed or in terms of Section 130 ... it was a withdrawal of their liabilities under the existing guarantee ... which is totally different from the revocation. Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690- Proof of receipt: Use registered post or get acknowledgment. Mere stamps may not prove it.- No post-notice actions: Signing renewals afterward undermines claims. Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690
Even death revokes future liability (Section 131), unless contracted otherwise. Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254
Crucially, revocation doesn't require canceling the principal debtor's contract. The guarantee is collateral and co-extensive (Section 128) but separable. Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254H. R. BASAVARAJ VS CANARA BANK - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1685 No law mandates principal contract termination for release.
Discharge modes like variance without consent (Section 133) or principal debtor release (Section 134) are separate and also independent. Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254 Guarantees often permit creditor variations (e.g., extensions) without discharging the surety. State Bank Of Saurashtra VS Ghitranjan Rangnath Raja - 1980 0 Supreme(SC) 242
Recent cases reinforce this. In insolvency contexts, guarantor liability persists post-resolution plans: approval of a resolution plan does not ipso facto discharge a personal guarantor (of a corporate debtor) of her or his liabilities under the contract of guarantee. Sanjay Sarin VS Authorised Officer, Canara Bank - 2022 Supreme(Del) 2071PRASHANT SHASHI RUIA VS STATE BANK OF INDIA - 2021 Supreme(Guj) 1178 The release of a principal debtor via insolvency doesn't absolve the guarantor, as it's an independent contract. Sanjay Sarin VS Authorised Officer, Canara Bank - 2022 Supreme(Del) 2071
Similarly, under IBC Section 95(1), personal guarantors face co-extensive liability starting from default, unaffected by principal proceedings. State Bank of India vs Mr. Thota Chandrakanth - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 689State Bank of India vs Mr. Thota Madhu - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1101State Bank of India vs Mr. Thota Subbarayudu - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 521
Not all guarantees qualify:- Non-continuing guarantees: No revocation; need full discharge (e.g., performance).- Waiver clauses: Sureties may waive Section 130 rights if clear and unambiguous. H. R. BASAVARAJ VS CANARA BANK - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1685- Past liabilities: Always binding pre-notice. Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254- Clausal overrides: Terms dictate notice form, but can't eliminate statutory rights without waiver. State Bank Of Saurashtra VS Ghitranjan Rangnath Raja - 1980 0 Supreme(SC) 242Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690- Evidence failures: Mere claims of withdrawal without proof or acceptance fail. State Bank of India VS Jatin Rajpal - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 5234 The Respondent contended that he withdrew from the guarantee on 02.07.2016. However, he has failed to produce any document evidencing the Applicant’s acceptance or release of him from the personal guarantee.
In enforcement suits, guarantees hold if executed properly, with consideration, sans duress. Courts grant summary judgment where no triable issues exist. PROVENTUS BINA SDN BHD vs TANG KAE SHIH
Limitation periods (3 years under Article 55) start from breach or demand refusal, but acknowledgments extend them. State Bank of India vs Mr. Thota Chandrakanth - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 689State Bank of India vs Mr. Thota Subbarayudu - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 521
To revoke safely:1. Review the deed for notice clauses or waivers.2. Send explicit, written notice via trackable means: I hereby revoke this continuing guarantee under Section 130 for future transactions, effective upon receipt.3. Avoid ambiguous language seeking past discharge.4. Monitor pre-notice defaults—you remain liable.5. If disputed, file for declaration; informal letters rarely work. Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690
Post-revocation, creditors can still pursue past dues independently, as seen in SARFAESI recoveries unaffected by principal resolutions. Sanjay Sarin VS Authorised Officer, Canara Bank - 2022 Supreme(Del) 2071
This framework empowers guarantors while protecting creditors' rights. For tailored advice, engage a lawyer—laws evolve, and facts matter.
References: Sections 128-134, Indian Contract Act, 1872; cited cases including Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 254, Lekh Raj Narinder Kumar VS Union Bank of India - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1690, Sanjay Sarin VS Authorised Officer, Canara Bank - 2022 Supreme(Del) 2071, etc.
#PersonalGuarantee, #GuarantorRights, #IndianContractAct
In view of the above discussion, it is held that approval of a resolution plan does not ipso facto discharge a personal guarantor (of a corporate debtor) of her or his liabilities under the contract of guarantee. ... “Contract of guarantee”, “surety”, “principal debtor” and “creditor”.—A ―contract of guarantee‖ is a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his default. ... The aforesa....
guarantee has been duly served on the Personal Guarantor. ... State Bank of India and Anr., (2025) ibclaw.in 108 NCLAT, observed that non-service of the Rule 7 Demand Notice does not absolve the Personal Guarantor from liability under the Deed of Guarantee, especially when the Personal Guarantor has not denied execution of the guarantee or service of ... (i) The common clauses of the Guarantee Agreement dated 13.0....
The petitioner has also executed guarantee agreements on 30.04.2012 and 26.10.2012, agreeing to stand as a continuing guarantor and this guarantee agreement is in the nature of personal guarantee given by the petitioner. ... After such purchase by the petitioner, without the sale being rendered to be bad in law, can the very same property be roped in once again by employing Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?. ... The guarantee agreements d....
Thus, the debt becomes due against a personal guarantor only upon invocation of the guarantee in terms of the contract. 42. ... Guarantors to Corporate Debtor) Rules, 2019, seeking an order for initiation of the Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (PIRP against Katmula Srinivasa Reddy, Personal Guarantor/ Respondent 1, who is the Personal Guarantor (PG) of M/s. ... It is submitted that reliance on the SARFAESI n....
Thus, the debt becomes due against a personal guarantor only upon invocation of the guarantee in terms of the contract. 42. ... It is submitted that reliance on the SARFAESI notice dated 02.02.2017 is misconceived, as the notice under Section 13(2) was addressed only to the Corporate Debtor and merely marked to the Personal Guarantor, without any demand or invocation of the guarantee. ... (supra), a guarantor’s liability depends on terms of his #HL_....
The Respondent contended that he withdrew from the guarantee on 02.07.2016. However, he has failed to produce any document evidencing the Applicant’s acceptance or release of him from the personal guarantee. ... However, no response was received from the Personal Guarantor. The Resolution Professional further submits that no document has been received evidencing cancellation or termination of the Personal Guarantee Agreement dated ....
Instead, the personal guarantee expressly states that "The Guarantor confirms that the contents and effects of this Guarantee have been explained to the Guarantor by the Guarantor's own independent legal advisors and that the Guarantor fully understand the same before executing this Guarantee". ... The Personal Guarantee Is Not Unenforceable For Want Of Consideration [33] D alleges that the personal guar....
The Bank unconditionally and irrevocably promised to pay, on demand, the amount of liability undertaken in the guarantee without any demur or dispute in terms of the bank guarantee. ... The period of limitation under Article 55 of the Indian Limitation Act , 1963 for enforcing the liability of the Personal Guarantor under the surety bond is three years, when the contract is broken or the breach of the contract occurs. ... 4.2 On the question of liability of the #HL_S....
The Bank unconditionally and irrevocably promised to pay, on demand, the amount of liability undertaken in the guarantee without any demur or dispute in terms of the bank guarantee. ... The period of limitation under Article 55 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 for enforcing the liability of the Personal Guarantor under the surety bond is three years, when the contract is broken or the breach of the contract occurs. ... 4.2 On the question of liability of the #HL_ST....
The Bank unconditionally and irrevocably promised to pay, on demand, the amount of liability undertaken in the guarantee without any demur or dispute in terms of the bank guarantee. ... The period of limitation under Article 55 of the Indian Limitation Act , 1963 for enforcing the liability of the Personal Guarantor under the surety bond is three years, when the contract is broken or the breach of the contract occurs. The residuary provision i.e. ... 4.2 On the ques....
In view of the above discussion, it is held that approval of a resolution plan does not ipso facto discharge a personal guarantor (of a corporate debtor) of her or his liabilities under the contract of guarantee. As held by this court, the release or discharge of a principal borrower from the debt owed by it to its creditor, by an involuntary process, i.e. by operation of law, or due to liquidation or insolvency proceeding, does not absolve the surety/guarantor of his or her liability, which arises out of an independent contract."
In view of the above discussion, it is held that approval of a resolution plan does not ipso facto discharge a personal guarantor (of a corporate debtor) of her or his liabilities under the contract of guarantee. As held by this court, the release or discharge of a principal borrower from the debt owed by it to its creditor, by an involuntary process, i.e. by operation of law, or due to liquidation or insolvency proceeding, does not absolve the surety/guarantor of his or her liability, which arises out of an independent contract. Also, under the caption “terms of settlement....
The Guarantor hereby agrees that the Bank has an absolute right to call upon the Guarantor to declare on oath the details of all his/her/its assets and when called upon, the Guarantor will unconditionally, within a period of three (3) days, declare on oath, the details of all his/her/its assets (whether moveable or immoveable, whether tangible or intangible), whether held solely or jointly, and, whether constitutes Security for this Guarantee or not, in a form and manner satisfactory to the Bank. The Guarantor agrees and undertakes that such disclosed assets shall not be encumbered....
Otherwise also any guarantor can walk away from the guarantee after a particular date, although he may be liable for liabilities up to the date he was guarantor. It is also submitted by the counsel for the complainant that since the last extension of guarantee was limited by the complainant only up to March, 2010, therefore, there is no question of the guarantee being irrevocable. But in the present case the guarantee was specifically extended only up to March, 2010. Therefore, after March, 2010 the complainant-company was no more the guarantor.
The breach of contract of guarantee on the part of the guarantor can take place only if demand is made by the creditor and the same is refused by the guarantor either expressly or impliedly. The limitation of three years can also be reckoned from the date of alleged breach of contract on the part of the guarantor. In fact the right to sue a guarantor accrues only when a demand for payment was made and it was refused by the guarantor. Admittedly, in the present case, the plaintiff being the creditor did not make any demand from defendant No.1 on the strength of alleged guara....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
