Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Modus Operandi Bureau (MOB) and related police units are used to monitor and track criminal activities, including identifying rowdy sheeters and suspects involved in crimes such as robberies, extortion, and other illegal acts ["MELWIN ARUN D CUNHA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["FAIJAL S/O MAHAMADRAFIQ BANKAPUR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"].
Several cases highlight that the names of individuals are entered into the Modus Operandi Bureau based on their criminal activities or suspicious behaviors, often leading to annual summons or inclusion in the bureau's registry ["MELWIN ARUN D CUNHA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["FAIJAL S/O MAHAMADRAFIQ BANKAPUR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["SHARNAPPA S/O MALLIKARJUNAPPA MUCHANDI Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, - Karnataka"].
Courts, including the Karnataka High Court, have addressed the legality and implications of placing individuals' names in the MOB. Petitions have been filed to remove or quash such entries, arguing that inclusion affects fundamental rights and may be based on improper or unfounded grounds ["MELWIN ARUN D CUNHA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["FAIJAL S/O MAHAMADRAFIQ BANKAPUR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["SHARNAPPA S/O MALLIKARJUNAPPA MUCHANDI Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, - Karnataka"].
The courts have emphasized that the process of entering names into the MOB must adhere to proper guidelines, and any arbitrary or unwarranted inclusion can violate citizens' rights. Orders have been issued to ensure compliance with these guidelines and to remove names when justified ["MELWIN ARUN D CUNHA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["FAIJAL S/O MAHAMADRAFIQ BANKAPUR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"].
There are instances where the modus operandi involves impersonation, misuse of official identity cards, or fraudulent activities, which courts have scrutinized. In such cases, courts have refused to exercise jurisdiction if the activities are found to be illegal or misleading ["SURSEHKUMAR B. SHUKLA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"].
The courts have also considered the procedural aspects, such as appeals under the Karnataka High Court Act, and have noted that proper legal channels must be followed before removing or quashing entries in the MOB ["SHARNAPPA S/O MALLIKARJUNAPPA MUCHANDI Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, - Karnataka"] ["SRI. DASTGIR MOHAMMED HUSSAIN KHAJI Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE - Karnataka"].
Overall, the Karnataka High Court has taken a stance that entries in the Modus Operandi Bureau should be carefully scrutinized, and individuals can seek relief through writ petitions to have their names removed if the inclusion is unjustified or violates their rights ["MELWIN ARUN D CUNHA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"] ["FAIJAL S/O MAHAMADRAFIQ BANKAPUR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The Karnataka High Court has addressed issues related to the inclusion of individuals in the Modus Operandi Bureau, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal procedures and guidelines. It has quashed or directed the removal of such entries when they are found to be unjustified or prejudicial to citizens' rights. The court balances the police's need to monitor criminal activities with protecting individual rights, and has consistently held that improper or arbitrary inclusion can be challenged through writ petitions.
In the realm of criminal law in India, terms like modus operandi bureau card often surface in discussions involving police surveillance and criminal records. If you're searching for modus operandi bureau card quashed Karnataka High Court, you're likely dealing with a situation where a person's name has been entered into police databases, such as the Modus Operandi Bureau (MOB), and seeking judicial relief. This blog post delves into whether the Karnataka High Court has quashed such entries, drawing from available legal documents and precedents. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
The Modus Operandi Bureau is a specialized police wing that maintains records of criminals' methods of operation (modus operandi), fingerprints, photographs, and other identifiers to aid investigations. In Karnataka, MOB is one of the wings of the Police Department, helping with fingerprint comparisons stored in police databases. Gajendra Alias Bikla VS State By C. C. B. , N. T. Pet Police - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 999
For instance, It is brought to the notice of the Court by the learned SPP-II that MOB is in existence from British time. In the Karnataka State, Modus Operandi Bureau (MOB) is one of the Wings of the Police Department and the said Wing helps the Investigation Authorities for comparison of the finger prints. Gajendra Alias Bikla VS State By C. C. B. , N. T. Pet Police - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 999
Entries in MOB or rowdy sheeter lists are often made for individuals suspected of repeated offenses like robberies. These records can stigmatize a person, affecting employment and personal life, prompting petitions under Article 226 or CrPC Section 482 to quash or remove them.
A direct search for cases where the Karnataka High Court quashed a modus operandi bureau card yields no high-confidence matches in the reviewed documents. No rulings explicitly reference quashing MOB cards by the Karnataka High Court in the provided materials. State of Maharashtra Through CBI VS Vikram Anantrai Doshi - 2015 3 Supreme 497D. DEVARAJA VS OWAIS SABEER HUSSAIN - 2020 4 Supreme 735
However, related proceedings exist:- Petitions seeking removal from rowdy sheeter lists and MOB entries have been filed in the Karnataka High Court. For example, one case prays: To remove the rowdy sheeter and modus Operandi Bureau opened in the name of petitioner by the respondents... To compensate for violation of fundamental right of a person for inserting the name in Rowdy Sheeter and Modus Operandi Bureau by not adhering to the mandated... State of Karnataka & others reported in 2022 (4) KCCR 3648. JAINULLABIDDIN G KADOLI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 12826- In another Karnataka High Court matter at Bengaluru: Operandi Bureau (MOB) to keep a watch on his activities... his name was entered in Modus Operandi Bureau (MOB) due to suspected involvement in robberies. The petitioner sought relief from such entry. SRI SIRAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY
These indicate that Karnataka High Court entertains such pleas, but outcomes on quashing MOB cards specifically are not confirmed as quashed in the documents.
Courts exercise inherent powers under CrPC Section 482 to quash proceedings if they are frivolous or abuse process, but public interest often prevails in serious crimes.
For MOB entries, courts scrutinize if inclusion follows due process. Police standing orders mandate procedures for missing persons, rowdy sheets, and MOB updates, like flashing messages to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB, and MOB. T.NITHYANANDAN vs THE STATE REP BY - 2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 41723Urmiladevi W/o Shri Premratan VS State, Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 159
While Karnataka-specific quashing is absent, MOB references appear nationally:
Generally, courts may quash if:- No prima facie evidence of criminal modus operandi.- Violation of fundamental rights or procedural lapses (e.g., no notice before entry). JAINULLABIDDIN G KADOLI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 12826- Entries become stale post-rehabilitation.
However, in active criminal probes, quashing is rare due to investigative needs. Supreme Court precedents emphasize completing the chain of circumstances before relief. State of Maharashtra Through CBI VS Vikram Anantrai Doshi - 2015 3 Supreme 497Gajendra Alias Bikla VS State By C. C. B. , N. T. Pet Police - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 999
In COVID-related FIR quashings, Karnataka High Court (via concessions) quashed cases against foreign nationals, showing flexibility in non-serious matters. Konan Kodio Ganstone VS State Of Maharashtra - 2020 Supreme(Bom) 787
No direct Karnataka High Court ruling quashes a modus operandi bureau card in the analyzed documents, but petitions challenging such entries are viable. MOB serves crucial investigative roles, from fingerprint matching Gajendra Alias Bikla VS State By C. C. B. , N. T. Pet Police - 2015 Supreme(Kar) 999 to tracking patterns SRI SIRAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY, yet procedural fairness is key.
Key Takeaways:- MOB entries can be challenged if arbitrary.- Public interest trumps private compromises in fraud/modern crimes. State of Maharashtra Through CBI VS Vikram Anantrai Doshi - 2015 3 Supreme 497- Follow police protocols strictly to avoid judicial scrutiny.- For personalized relief, engage legal experts promptly.
This analysis is based solely on provided legal documents. Stay informed on evolving precedents, as courts continue balancing individual rights and public safety.
#KarnatakaHighCourt, #ModusOperandiBureau, #QuashMOBCard
KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. ... The issue in the lis is weather the name of the petitioner drawn into the Modus Operandi Bureau could be sustained even today for it to remain in the said registry. Drawing up of a name of a criminal under the Modus Operandi Bureau, is dealt....
To remove the rowdy sheeter and modus Operandi Bureau opened in the name of petitioner by the respondents. Annexures-A & B. ... To compensate for violation of fundamental right of a person for inserting the name inf Rowdy Sheeter and Modus Operandi Bureau by not adhering to the mandated ... State of Karnataka & others reported - 3 - in 2022 (4) KCCR 3648. ... Grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and necessary, in th....
operandi of the present applicant, in the considered opinion of this Court, this Court would not intend to exercise jurisdiction in favour of the present applicant. ... of the identity card, one of which has been provided by learned APP for the perusal of this Court, would reveal that the entire identity card also masquerades itself to be some kind of an official identity card. ... Learned APP would submit that having regard to the entire modus #HL_S....
Dead bodies and send it to DSPs Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. ... (xiii) In all the cases of Missing, Kidnapped, Deserter, Wanted, Escaped, Unidentified Person, Unidentified Dead body and, when traced, message should be flashed to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau ... (iv) The SHOs will prepare "Talash" Forms for all cases reported in 2005 and send them to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi#....
Operandi Bureau. ... Operandi Bureau. ... Operandi Bureau by the Investigating Officer. ... 2) Order of the High Court, Madras, HCP No. ... Operandi Bureau, if not already sent p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:601pt;left:201pt
Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. ... (xiii) In all the cases of Missing, Kidnapped, Deserter, Wanted, Escaped, Unidentified Person, Unidentified Dead body and, when traced, message should be flashed to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. ... (iii) Immediately after registering the case, (Missing, Kidnapped, Deserter, Wanted, Escaped, Unidentified Person, Unidentified Dead Body), wireless messages should be sent to DSPs, Police Computer Win....
Operandi Bureau. ... Photos of Missing/Unidentified Dead bodies and send it to DSPs Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. ... Operandi Bureau by the Investigating Officer. ... (iv) The SHOs will prepare "Talash" Forms for all cases reported in 2005 and send them to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau, if not already sent (v) The IOs will collect ... We feel that the instruct....
Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. ... (xiii) In all the cases of Missing, Kidnapped, Deserter, Wanted, Escaped, Unidentified Person, Unidentified Dead body and, when traced, message should be flashed to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. ... (iii) Immediately after registering the case, (Missing, Kidnapped, Deserter, Wanted, Escaped, Unidentified Person, Unidentified Dead Body), wireless messages should be sent to DSPs, Police Computer Win....
Operandi Bureau (MOB) to keep a watch on his activities. ... 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS ... STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. ... robberies in the locality, thus his name was 3 entered in Modus ... In the instant petition petitioner has prayed for the following relief: Wherefore it is prayed that ....
Although M/s Carvaan Goods Carrier, had filed a writ petition in the High Court, but was dismissed. ... She also disclosed the modus operandi adopted by the officials of Ludhiana Improvement Trust. ... As regards petitioner-Gagandeep Goyal, the documentary evidence against him clearly shows that he had adopted a novel modus operandi for allotment of some plots to his favourites. ... The learned State counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to the Aadhaar #HL_STA....
This decision was not given on merits and it appears that only due to concession proposed by the counsels of the State and Central Authority, such order was made. Karnataka High Court quashed all the cases and F.I.Rs. and directed the accused persons to pay fne as may be directed by the authority of the Central Government. The order shows that the counsels of respondents representing State Government and the authority relating to visa had given concession by making submissions and there were some orders of coordinate benches made in the year 2017 in similar circumstances.
Forms for all cases reported in 2005 and send them to DSPs, Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau, if not already sent (v) The IOs will collect Photos of Missing/Unidentified Dead bodies and send it to DSPs Police Computer Wing, DCRB and Modus Operandi Bureau. (vi) Police Computer Wing will develop a software to match all the seven categories on different parameters, Photographs should also be included. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Police Computer Wing will submit a project report on this within two months.
It is brought to the notice of the Court by the learned SPP-II that MOB is in existence from British time. In the Karnataka State, Modus Operandi Bureau (MOB) is one of the Wings of the Police Department and the said Wing helps the Investigation Authorities for comparison of the finger prints. Thus it is clear from the evidence of P.W. 9 that the admitted finger prints of accused 1 were already fed to the data stored by the Police Department and such admitted finger prints of accused 1 were compared with the chance finger prints by P.W. 5.
The High Court also considered the meaning of “Swadhyaya Pariwar” as family of Swadhyayeesself studying group-and that the family can not constitute the class. The identical group of 21 complaints were filed in different Courts in the State of Gujarat in respect of the same accusations as made herein in respect of the identical alleged defamatory publication. The High court also made reference to the 35 to 40 complaints filed in the State of Maharashtra and it referred to the nature of allegations as nonspecific, general, too vague and are not attributed to the particular accused. ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
