Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Prohibition Against Filing Duplicate Claims - The core principle established is that a financial creditor cannot file the same claim multiple times across different insolvency proceedings against the same loan or debt without proper adjustment or verification. Filing identical claims in multiple CIRPs is considered unwarranted and can lead to proceedings being dismissed or deemed not maintainable. The courts have emphasized that claims must be verified and approved by the Resolution Professional (RP) before being admitted into the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Repeated claims for the same debt, especially without proper verification, are not permissible under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) ["2022 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 259"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4511"].
Claims for the Same Debt in Multiple Proceedings - The courts have clarified that a financial creditor cannot invoke multiple remedies for the same debt in different insolvency proceedings against different group companies unless adjustments are made. Filing claims in multiple CIRPs for the same debt is not allowed, especially if the claim has already been adjudicated or disposed of in a prior proceeding ["2022 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 35"], ["2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 5067"].
Proper Classification and Verification of Claims - Claims must be accurately classified as financial debts and verified by the RP. Reclassification of claims (e.g., from financial to operational creditor) without proper reasons or prior approval is unlawful. Claims based on default or breach of settlement terms require proper documentation and cannot be retroactively altered or filed repeatedly without due process ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 429"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1911"].
Use of Insolvency Proceedings as a Recovery Tool - Insolvency proceedings are primarily meant for resolution and not for mere recovery. Using CIRPs to revive time-barred claims or to recover the same debt multiple times is impermissible. The courts have upheld that proceedings under IBC cannot be used to revive barred claims or to double recover for the same debt ["INDNCLAT000000861"], ["2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1183"].
Legal Consequences of Filing Multiple Claims - Filing the same claim in multiple CIRPs or without proper verification can lead to the claim being rejected or the proceedings being dismissed. Courts have also held that a decree holder or a person with a court judgment can be treated as a financial creditor, but claims must be substantiated and not duplicated ["2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1289"], ["2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1136"].
Role of the Resolution Professional and Authority - The IRP/RP has the authority to admit, classify, and verify claims but cannot review or change the classification of claims (e.g., from financial to operational) without proper approval. They must ensure claims are not filed or repeated unjustifiably and that the same debt is not claimed multiple times across proceedings ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 429"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1911"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The courts consistently reinforce that a financial creditor cannot file the same claim twice in multiple insolvency proceedings without proper adjustment or verification. Claims must be properly classified, verified, and admitted before being considered in CIRPs. Attempting to recover the same debt multiple times or filing claims without due process undermines the purpose of the IBC and can result in proceedings being dismissed or claims rejected. The overarching principle is to prevent abuse of insolvency processes for recovery purposes, ensuring claims are genuine, verified, and not duplicated ["2022 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 259"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4511"].
References:- ["2022 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 259"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4511"]- ["2022 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 35"]- ["2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 5067"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 429"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1911"]- ["INDNCLAT000000861"]- ["2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1183"]- ["2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1289"]- ["2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1136"]
In the complex world of corporate insolvency under India's , play a pivotal role. However, a recent emphasis by the clarifies a critical limitation: Financial Creditor Can't File Same Claim Twice For Same Loan In Multiple Without Proper Adjustment. This ruling underscores the need for proper reconciliation to prevent and .
This principle is vital for lenders, businesses, and insolvency professionals navigating multiple proceedings involving group companies or co-borrowers. In this post, we break down the NCLAT's stance, key judicial precedents, exceptions, and practical recommendations—drawing from landmark cases and related sources.
The question at hand is straightforward yet profound: Can a financial creditor submit the identical claim for the same loan across different insolvency resolutions without accounting for prior admissions or settlements? The answer, as per NCLAT and precedents, is no—absent proper adjustment.
Once a claim is admitted or settled in a or , it cannot be reasserted as a fresh claim 2024 2 Supreme 309. This prevents duplication, ensuring claims are reconciled to avoid creditors realizing the same debt multiple times 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 958.
The law mandates that claims settled in one proceeding must be adjusted in subsequent ones. The in held that once a claim has fructified into a final judgment post adjudication by a tribunal or court, the amount payable under the judgment, decree, order or recovery certificate, will give rise to a new cause of action in favour of the creditor 2024 2 Supreme 309. However, this new cause of action does not permit repeated filings without adjustment; instead, it emphasizes finality—settled claims are extinguished or adjusted, barring re-recovery.
NCLAT reinforces this by stating that claims approved in a stand extinguished or must be treated as adjusted 2024 2 Supreme 309. Allowing otherwise would undermine IBC's objectives: maximizing asset value, equitable distribution, and preventing .
In Essar Steel Ltd., the reaffirmed that resolution plans provide finality, preventing subsequent claims for the same debt unless reconciled 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 843 2024 2 Supreme 309.
NCLAT has consistently rejected attempts to re-file settled claims, viewing them as violations of insolvency principles. For instance, in cases involving group companies, cannot invoke multiple remedies against a single loan amount leading to insolvency of multiple entities without adjustment
. This echoes concerns over whether creditors can pursue parallel proceedings despite prior settlements.
Related rulings highlight scrutiny on claim validity:- Creditors must disclose the true nature of transactions; failure to do so bars in subsequent claims 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 6758.- Fresh petitions may be permissible under settlement deeds, but only if not duplicative 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 5540.
In another context, operational creditors' demands under led to applications when dues remained unpaid, but face stricter adjustment rules 2021 0 Supreme(Gau) 336.
While the rule is strict, exceptions exist:- Unsettled Claims: If a claim was not admitted or included in prior proceedings, it may be filed afresh.- Non-Adjudicated Portions: Unresolved parts can be pursued, provided reconciliation with settled amounts 2024 2 Supreme 309.- Co-Borrower Scenarios: Liberty to file against others exists, but adjustments prevent double realization 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 958.
However, re-filing without adjustment risks rejection, contempt, or dismissal. For example, in OTS (One-Time Settlement) breaches, admitted petitions post-, but only after confirming no prior duplication 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 197. Limitation under also applies, as seen in SARFAESI-IBC overlaps.
Government companies are not exempt; they fall under IBC like private entities, performing commercial functions without special insulation 2021 0 Supreme(Gau) 317 2021 0 Supreme(Gau) 336.
Courts emphasize a single forum for insolvency to avoid delays from multiple proceedings 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 1024. In guarantor cases, properties enter the only after principles, like hearings 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 1024. Tax claims in resolution plans extinguish liabilities, allowing refunds of pre-deposits post-approval 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 662.
These trends reinforce: IBC prioritizes efficiency, finality, and fairness.
To navigate this landscape:- Document Thoroughly: Ensure initial claims are fully admitted and settled.- Reconcile Promptly: Adjust subsequent filings against prior recoveries.- Seek Board Approvals: Required for petitions 2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 396.- Monitor Group Exposures: Avoid triggering multiple insolvencies for one loan
.
Tribunals should enforce no-double-recovery rigorously.
Note: This is general information based on judicial trends and not specific legal advice. Consult qualified professionals for your situation.
NCLAT's ruling firmly establishes that a financial creditor cannot file the same claim twice for the same loan in multiple without proper adjustment or reconciliation2024 2 Supreme 309 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 958. This upholds IBC's goals of finality, equity, and value maximization.
Key Takeaways:- Settled claims are extinguished—adjust or abstain.- Duplication invites rejection and risks claims.- Exceptions are narrow; prioritize reconciliation.
Stay informed on evolving IBC jurisprudence to safeguard your interests in insolvency matters.
#NCLAT #InsolvencyLaw #IBC
n) Whether the Financial Creditor is entitled to invoke multiple remedies against a single Loan Amount resulting into insolvency of multiple Group Companies despite ... The question n) is whether the financial creditor is entitled to invoke multiple remedies against the single loan amount resulting into insolvency of multiple companies despite the ....
However, on 01.07.2019, the classification of Rs. 4 Crore was changed from an advance to unsecured loan without any document or purpose for such an alleged loan. ... The Applicant in the present matter being a Financial Creditor itself cannot file an application regarding consideration of a creditor as ‘Financial Creditor’ or ‘Operational Creditor’. v. ... Furthermore, Applicant being a Financial ....
Moreover, till the financial creditor is able to get payment of his claim, he can file claim in all the CIRPs and also have voting rights in the respective CoCs based on the quantum of his financial debt. ... /Corporate Debtor to the Financial Creditor (Respondent No. 1); (ii) Whether the financial creditor can invoke multiple remedies by filing claims of the same amount in some other Corporate #H....
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was filed for the purpose of execution of Decree passed by Debt Recovery Tribunal in favour of Financial Creditor, that is, for a purpose other than Resolution of Insolvency. ... CA (AT) (Ins) No.608/2020 where NCLAT has determined that the Financial Creditor does not include the Decree Holder and allowed the Appeal, setting aside the orders of NCLT, admitting the CIRP. ... The Appellant contends that NCLT, Hyderabad has passed th....
As per Clause 8, the Financial Creditor had the liberty to file fresh proceeding. ... Whether the claim of Financial Creditor is a financial debt? b. Whether the Company Petition is maintainable for breach of any settlement terms? c. ... It has been argued by Learned Senior Counsel appearing for Corporate Debtor that the Financial Creditor has no right to file fresh section 7 petition in terms of Deed of Settlement....
The contention of the corporate debtor is that financial creditor failed to infuse required funds and failed to give financial support as and when required. The financial creditor filed voluminous documents along with the application to prove its claim. ... The corporate debtor failed to comply with the terms of OTS Scheme sanctioned by the financial creditor. The accounts of the corporate debtor were declared as NPA by the financial#HL_END....
Shivakumar Reddy (supra) a decree holder can be treated as a Financial Creditor. Thus, without any doubt it can be concluded that a decree holder can be treated as a Financial Creditor. ... Since the amount is payable to the Financial Creditor and based on the decree passed by the Court, the Financial Creditor was legally entitled to file a petition under Section 7 of the I & B Code. 19. ... Moreover, a judgment ....
The Applicant has filed its claim in the present proceedings without disclosing the true nature of the transaction in respect of which it now seeks reliefs. 15. ... In our considered opinion, we don’t find the Applicant having any locus to file claim before the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor herein based on the Loan Agreement dated 01.2.2023 and subsequently, in order to justify the said claim, he cannot seek financial records of the....
The Financial Creditor is entitled to claim its dues, establishing the default in payment of the financial debt beyond doubt. ... Further, plea of medical the Corporate Debtor is also not sustainable as The Corporate Debtor was granted multiple opportunities to file a reply but failed to do so. The proceedings have been ongoing since 16.02.2024. ... Ltd. (2024) ibclaw.in 861 NCLAT again on 20.12.2024 upheld the NCLT‟s decision, ruling that #HL_START....
persons who may file an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority, on behalf of the financial creditor: - (i) a guardian; (ii) an executor or administrator of an estate of a financial creditor; (iii) a trustee (including ... It is alleged that the financial creditor has filed the present application without obtaining a Board Resolution, as required....
However, once the claim of the Financial Creditor is discharged, there can be no question of recovery of the claim twice over.
Superficially this logic of the Tax Board appears to be justified in view the stipulation made in Section 53 (5) of the Act of 2003 that the burden of proof is on the dealer or the person claiming the refund. However, when the situation is considered in light of the order passed in the insolvency proceedings, it becomes clear that the entire tax liability accruing to the Department was put forth by way of a claim filed by the Department before the NCLAT in the capacity of a statutory creditor. The Resolution Plan having been approved and the claim of the Department having b....
In the present case, one of the operational creditors of the Company, namely, M/s Alloys and Metals (India), initiated this proceeding by giving a notice under Section 8 to the Company demanding its dues. 7. All the same, insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency Code can be initiated by a financial creditor under Section 7 or by an operational creditor under Section 8. Since these dues were not paid, an application was moved before the adjudicating authority under Section 9 of the Act.
In the present case, one of the operational creditors of the Company, namely, M/s Alloys and Metals (India), initiated this proceeding by giving a notice under Section 8 to the Company demanding its dues. 7. All the same, insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency Code can be initiated by a financial creditor under Section 7 or by an operational creditor under Section 8. Since these dues were not paid, an application was moved before the adjudicating authority under Section 9 of the Act.
A delay in completion of the insolvency proceedings would diminish the value of the debtor's assets and hamper the prospects of a successful reorganization or liquidation. The institutional framework under the IBC contemplated the establishment of a single forum to deal with matters of insolvency, which were distributed earlier across multiple fora. These proceedings may cause undue delay in the insolvency resolution process due to multiple proceedings in trial courts and courts of appeal. In the absence of a court exercising exclusive jurisdiction over matters relating to insolven....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
