Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights VS Union of India...
National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights VS Union of India - 2017 2 Supreme 79 : Yes, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes is duty-bound to investigate complaints of atrocities against its members. This is explicitly provided under Article 338(5)(b) of the Constitution of India, which states that it shall be the duty of the Commission to ''''inquire into specific complaints with respect to the deprivation of rights and safeguards of the Scheduled Castes.'''' Furthermore, the Rules of Procedure of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, as referenced in the document, deal with investigation and inquiry by the Commission, reinforcing its statutory obligation to act on such complaints.Checking relevance for Collector, Bilaspur VS Ajit P. K. Jogi...
Checking relevance for Patan Jamal Vali VS State of Andhra Pradesh...
Checking relevance for State of Punjab VS Davinder Singh...
Checking relevance for Prathvi Raj Chauhan VS Union Of India...
Checking relevance for Murasoli Trust Represented by its Trustee, R. S. Bharathi, Chennai VS National Commission for Scheduled Castes, Rep. by Secretary, New Delhi...
Murasoli Trust Represented by its Trustee, R. S. Bharathi, Chennai VS National Commission for Scheduled Castes, Rep. by Secretary, New Delhi - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 95 : The National Commission for Scheduled Castes is duty-bound to investigate complaints relating to the deprivation of rights and safeguards of Scheduled Castes, including allegations of illegal occupation or transfer of Panchami land allotted to Scheduled Caste members. The court held that the NCSC has a constitutional duty under Article 338(5)(a) to investigate and monitor all matters relating to safeguards provided for Scheduled Castes, including land matters where such lands are specifically allotted for their benefit. This includes probing complaints of illegal encroachment or occupation of Panchami lands, which constitutes a deprivation of rights and safeguards, thereby falling squarely within the Commission''''s jurisdiction.Checking relevance for National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Ltd. VS National Commission For Scheduled Tribes...
Checking relevance for Manoranjan Prasad Sinha VS Union of India through the Secretary, New Delhi...
Manoranjan Prasad Sinha VS Union of India through the Secretary, New Delhi - 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 401 : Yes, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes is duty-bound to investigate complaints of atrocities against its members. This is established under Article 338(5)(b) of the Constitution of India, which explicitly states that it shall be the duty of the Commission to ''''inquire into specific complaints with respect to the deprivation of rights and safeguards of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.'''' Since the Commission is mandated to investigate complaints related to the deprivation of rights and safeguards of Scheduled Castes, and atrocities against members of this community fall within that scope, the Commission is legally obligated to inquire into such complaints. The document further reinforces this by noting that the Commission has the power to investigate matters relating to safeguards provided for Scheduled Castes under the Constitution, and that it must inquire into specific complaints regarding deprivation of rights, which includes acts of atrocity.Checking relevance for HINDU SEVA KENDRAM VS UNION OF INDIA...
HINDU SEVA KENDRAM VS UNION OF INDIA - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 536 : Article 338(5)(b) of the Constitution of India explicitly states that it shall be the duty of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes to ''''inquire into specific complaints with respect to the deprivation of rights and safeguards of the Scheduled Castes.'''' This includes complaints of atrocities committed against members of the Scheduled Castes, as such acts constitute a deprivation of their rights and safeguards under the Constitution. Therefore, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes is duty-bound to investigate complaints of atrocities on its members.Checking relevance for Nagappan VS State represented by Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai...
Checking relevance for Asharfi VS State of Uttar Pradesh...
Checking relevance for MADDURAPPA VS STATE OF KARNATAKA...
Checking relevance for Action Committee On Issue Of Caste Certificate To Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes In The State Of Maharashtra VS Union Of India...
Checking relevance for E. V. Chinnaiah VS State Of A. P. ...
Checking relevance for Paramjit Kaur VS State Of Punjab...
Checking relevance for Kailash Sonkar VS Maya Devi...
Checking relevance for Fisherman Care, Registered Association, Rep by its President, L. T. A. Peter Rayan, Chennai VS Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi...
Fisherman Care, Registered Association, Rep by its President, L. T. A. Peter Rayan, Chennai VS Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 738 : The National Commission for Scheduled Castes is duty-bound to inquire into specific complaints with respect to the deprivation of rights and safeguards of the Scheduled Castes, including complaints arising from the non-inclusion of a group in the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. This duty includes investigating complaints related to atrocities committed against members of Scheduled Castes, as such deprivation falls within the Commission''''s mandate under clause (5)(b) of Article 338 of the Constitution.
