IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.
Amit Kumar & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Crl.) 2945 of 2023
Decided On : 30-01-2024
Caste Discrimination - Writ Petition - SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989 - [Article 226, Article 227, SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought writs to direct police to register FIRs for the deaths of their sons, alleging caste-based discrimination and murder conspiracy by IIT faculty. Enquiries revealed the deceased students' academic struggles and no evidence of caste-based discrimination.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no evidence of caste-based discrimination or murder conspiracy, emphasizing the students' academic struggles and lack of complaints regarding discrimination. The court dismissed the petition for lacking merit.
Issues: Alleged caste-based discrimination and murder conspiracy by IIT faculty, police's duty to register FIRs under SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the lack of evidence for caste-based discrimination or murder conspiracy, and the students' academic struggles as the likely cause of their deaths. The court highlighted the need for caution in issuing mandamus based on sympathy or sentiments.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed for lacking merit.
JUDGMENT
Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.
1. The present petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:
"a) to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus, thereby directing the police authorities or Respondent No. 6 to register appropriate FIRs in the cases involving the deaths of the sons of Petitioner No. 2 and Petitioner No. 3; and
b) to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus, thereby directing the investigation of the cases to be done by Respondent No. 6; and
c) to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus, thereby directing the Respondent No. 6 to conduct a thorough, impartial investigation into the caste based atrocities being committed in the premises of Respondent No. 5; and
d) monitor the investigation of the case; and
e) direct an independent inquiry into case based atrocities being committed in the premises of Respondent No. 5; and
f) to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus, thereby commanding the Respondents to ensure strict compliance and implementation of provisions of SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989 and rules and regulations under the SC/ST(POA) Rules 1995.
g) pass any other or further orders, as this Hon'b1e Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the present case."
2. In brief the facts of the case are that Complaints dated 26.07.2023 and 09.09.2023 were filed by the petitioners who are the parents of two deceased students of B.Tech (Mathematics and Computing) at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, wherein, it was alleged that one student, namely, Ayush Ashna was found dead on 08.07.2023 at his Hostel Room No. WH-02, Seventh Floor, Udaygiri Hostel, IIT, New Delhi and another student, namely, Anil Kumar was found dead on 01.09.2023 in his Hostel Room No. EA-18, Ground Floor,Vidhyachal Hostel, IIT, New Delhi. It is alleged in the complaints that they were murdered with the conspiracy of IIT Faculty members to hide the real facts and both the students have been falsely shown to have committed suicide. It is further alleged in the complaints that both the students belonged to Scheduled Castes and they had informed their parents several times regarding caste discrimination by the faculty/staff of IIT, Delhi and therefore, the petitioners alleged that the faculty members are trying to save the real accused persons and the police officials are also not investigating the matter in a proper manner. In view of the above said complaints, an enquiry was conducted in both the cases.
3. As per the Status Report filed by the Ld. ASC, postmortem of the deceased Ayush Ashna was conducted vide PM No. 1500/23, wherein the cause of death was held to be "asphyxia as a result of hanging due to ligature". During the course of enquiry, statements of father, brother, other relatives and friends of the deceased were recorded in which it was found that the deceased had failed in some of the subjects in the prior semester exams due to which he was under depression. They further denied any foul play or any suspicion regarding the death of deceased. Father of the deceased, namely, Ramesh Kumar had later given a written complaint in the police station, in which he alleged that his son Ayush Ashna was facing caste based discrimination by his hostel mates and other faculty members during the beginning of his academic year 2019-2020 and he also suspected in the complaint that his son could not have taken such steps and someone might have killed his son with the connivance of faculty members. Therefore, to clarify the facts, the grade reports of Ayush Ashna were collected from IIT and it was found that during the 2nd semester of year 2022-23, he had failed in some of the subjects and got lower grades i.e., Grade F which stands for Very Poor in 5 out of 7 subjects. During further enquiry, se
Lalita Kumari vs. State of U.P. AIR 2012 SC 1515
Mithilesh Kumar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (2015) 9 SCC 795
National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights and Ors vs. Union of India and Ors. AIR 2017 SC 132
State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights
State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal & Ors.
Courts must exercise caution in issuing mandamus based on sympathy or sentiments, and must consider the totality of facts and evidence before making a decision.
The court held a CBI investigation warranted due to significant suspicions surrounding the death of a constable, implicating senior officers in possible misconduct.
The court established that systemic biases in law enforcement and procedural violations necessitate independent investigations to uphold the rights of marginalized communities.
(1) Investigation into an offense must be unbiased, honest, just, complete and in accordance with law.(2) A judicial balance must be struck between competing forces in a criminal trial between intere....
Extra-ordinary powers of High Court under Article 226 of Constitution must be exercised sparingly, cautiously and in exceptional situations where it becomes necessary to provide credibility and confi....
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.