Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
One Rupee Stamp Fixed and Notarised - When an affidavit or petition is prepared by a petition-drawer employed by a person, and a one rupee stamp is affixed and notarised, it is considered valid. The appellant in 1905 explained he sold a one rupee stamp to the complainant, which was used on an affidavit he prepared. The court held that petition-drawers acting within their scope can charge their employer for the stamp affixed to affidavits they prepare ASSARI v. PERERA.
Stamp Duty and Penalty - In cases where stamp duty is not fixed or paid at the time of document presentation, penalties of one rupee or more may apply. Courts have rejected revision petitions where the respondent/plaintiff did not fix stamps initially, emphasizing the importance of proper stamp fixation at the time of document submission S. Thanikachalam VS M. Perumal - Madras.
Stamp Value and Land Transactions - The Indian Stamp Act considers factors like land classification (agricultural, industrial) and spot verification by authorities to determine the appropriate stamp duty. Excessive valuation beyond statutory minimums (e.g., Rs. 55 lacs vs. Rs. 210 lacs per hectare) can be deemed irrational. Proper verification is crucial for accurate assessment Shyam Devi VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad.
Stamp Duty Fixation and Registration - The fixed percentage of stamp duty (e.g., 8% including transfer and registration charges) is mandated under the Stamp Act and Registration Act. Documents must be stamped accordingly before registration, and courts have upheld the collection of fixed stamp duties as per legal provisions Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai vs Sulochana Cotton Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. - Madras.
Refund of Stamp Duty - If stamps are spoiled or unused, applicants can seek refunds or cancellation, provided they prove bona fide purchase intentions. Orders rejecting refund applications are challenged in courts, which sometimes direct authorities to refund deficient stamp duty if verified correctly Ramesh Chandra Kalra VS Union of India - Delhi, Arun Kumar VS State Of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad.
Remission and Concessions - Certain projects, especially large-scale investments (e.g., Rs. 750 crores or more), qualify for stamp duty remission under government notifications. Courts have allowed petitions seeking remission, but paid stamp duty during proceedings is generally non-refundable unless authorities approve refunds Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad.
Legal Proceedings and Disputes - Courts have consistently emphasized the importance of proper stamp fixation and verification. Disputes often involve claims of undervaluation or non-payment, with courts directing authorities to refund excess or deficient duties after proper verification GURJEET SINGH vs UT OF J AND K TH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER FINANCE DEPTT AND OTHERS - Jammu and Kashmir, Musrat Jahan Vs. The State of Bihar - Patna.
The collected sources highlight that in petitions involving affidavits and legal documents, affixing a one rupee stamp and notarisation are valid if properly executed. The courts emphasize the importance of correct stamp duty fixation at the time of document presentation, with provisions for refunds if stamps are spoiled or unused. Proper verification, especially in land transactions, is critical for determining accurate stamp duty, and government notifications can provide concessions for large projects. Overall, adherence to legal procedures regarding stamp duty fixation and notarisation is essential for the validity of petitions and documents.
References:- ASSARI v. PERERA- S. Thanikachalam VS M. Perumal - Madras- Shyam Devi VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad- Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai vs Sulochana Cotton Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. - Madras- INDCAD000000126734- Arun Kumar VS State Of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad- GURJEET SINGH vs UT OF J AND K TH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER FINANCE DEPTT AND OTHERS - Jammu and Kashmir_HC_JKHC020052732021- Ramesh Chandra Kalra VS Union of India - Delhi- Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad- Musrat Jahan Vs. The State of Bihar - Patna
In the realm of Indian legal proceedings, proper documentation is crucial. A common query arises: If in a Petition Verification One Rupee Stamp Fixed and Notarised, is it valid? This question touches on stamp duty requirements, notarization, and court validations under the Indian Stamp Act and related laws. Whether you're filing a writ petition, affidavit, or application, understanding stamp affixation can prevent rejections or penalties.
This blog post breaks down the validity of using a one rupee stamp for petition verifications, drawing from court judgments and legal precedents. Note: This is general information based on case laws and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Petition verification typically involves an affidavit or declaration affirming the truth of the petition's contents. Under Indian law, such documents often require a court fee stamp or revenue stamp to be admissible.
The Indian Stamp Act, 1899, governs stamp duties, which vary by document type and value. For simpler instruments like affidavits prepared by petition-drawers, a nominal stamp suffices. Courts have clarified that one rupee stamp is sufficient for certain receipts or promissory notes, extending similar logic to petitions and applications. Parisutha Nadar VS Pichakkara Pillai - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1377 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1377
Historical and modern cases affirm that a one rupee stamp, when fixed correctly and notarised, validates many petitions. In a 1905-related ruling, the court upheld a petition-drawer's affidavit where a one rupee stamp was sold to the complainant and affixed. It was deemed valid as the drawer acted within scope. ASSARI v. PERERA
For pro-notes or debt acknowledgments, Ex.A1 when treated as pro-note or acknowledgement of debt, registration is not required. For pro-note or a receipt of money one rupee stamp is sufficient. This principle applies analogously to petition verifications. Parisutha Nadar VS Pichakkara Pillai - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1377 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1377
However, context matters:- Amendments to Stamp Act: Post-1998, stamps increased from 0.20 paise to one rupee in some cases, but insufficient stamps (e.g., 0.40 paise in 2002) led to misuse claims. K. Sasikumaran VS G. Sasikumar - 2015 Supreme(Mad) 1721 - 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 1721- Thumb Impressions: Fixed across stamps strengthen authenticity, unlike police verifications needing no stamps. MANJU DEVI VS PREMJIT KAUR - 2017 Supreme(Del) 4421 - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 4421
Courts emphasize timely stamp payment. In writ petitions, relief sought may be denied if stamps are deficient. M.Velmurugan vs The Chairperson - 2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 28251 - 2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 28251
For land transactions, spot verification determines duty, rejecting irrational valuations. Shyam Devi VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad
Fixed duties (e.g., 8% under Stamp and Registration Acts) must precede registration. Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai vs Sulochana Cotton Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. - Madras
Notarization by a public notary verifies signatures and contents, complementing the stamp. When combined with a one rupee stamp on affidavits or petitions, it typically satisfies courts, provided no higher duty applies (e.g., high-value conveyances).
In certificate applications for jobs or admissions, nativity certificates require proof of five years' residence and one rupee stamp.Vardhini Parthasarathy VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2314 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2314
Disputes often hinge on verification; undervaluation claims lead to directives for proper assessment. Musrat Jahan Vs. The State of Bihar - Patna
To ensure your petition verification holds:1. Affix Stamp Early: Use one rupee court fee/revenue stamp for low-value affidavits.2. Notarise Properly: Engage a notary for thumb impressions/signatures across the stamp.3. Verify Document Type: Higher duties for sales deeds; nominal for petitions.4. Check Amendments: Stay updated on Stamp Act changes.5. Seek Refunds if Needed: Apply for spoiled stamps with proof.
| Document Type | Typical Stamp | Notarization Needed? ||---------------|---------------|----------------------|| Petition Affidavit | One Rupee | Yes ASSARI v. PERERA || Pro-Note/Receipt | One Rupee Parisutha Nadar VS Pichakkara Pillai - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1377 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1377 | Optional || Nativity Certificate | One Rupee Vardhini Parthasarathy VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2314 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2314 | Yes || Land Sale Deed | Market Value-based Shyam Devi VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad | Yes |
Generally, a petition verification with a one rupee stamp fixed and notarised is valid for affidavits and applications, as upheld in multiple cases. Courts prioritize proper execution to avoid penalties, emphasizing one Rupee Court Fee stamp for routine filings. Vardhini Parthasarathy VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2368 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2368
Key Takeaways:- One rupee suffices for simple petitions; verify per Stamp Act.- Notarization bolsters validity. ASSARI v. PERERA- Timely stamping prevents dismissals. S. Thanikachalam VS M. Perumal - Madras- Refunds available for errors; remissions for qualifying projects.
Always cross-check with local rules, as practices vary by state. For personalized guidance, contact a legal expert.
References:- ASSARI v. PERERAS. Thanikachalam VS M. Perumal - MadrasShyam Devi VS State Of U. P. - AllahabadInspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai vs Sulochana Cotton Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. - MadrasM.Velmurugan vs The Chairperson - 2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 28251 - 2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 28251Arun Kumar VS State Of Uttar Pradesh - AllahabadGURJEET SINGH vs UT OF J AND K TH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER FINANCE DEPTT AND OTHERS - Jammu and KashmirRamesh Chandra Kalra VS Union of India - DelhiJai Prakash Associates Ltd. VS State of Uttar Pradesh - AllahabadMusrat Jahan Vs. The State of Bihar - PatnaParisutha Nadar VS Pichakkara Pillai - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1377 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1377Vardhini Parthasarathy VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2314 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2314Vardhini Parthasarathy VS State of Tamil Nadu - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2368 - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2368MANJU DEVI VS PREMJIT KAUR - 2017 Supreme(Del) 4421 - 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 4421K. Sasikumaran VS G. Sasikumar - 2015 Supreme(Mad) 1721 - 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 1721
#OneRupeeStamp, #PetitionVerification, #StampDutyIndia
It appears that the appellant is a petition-drawer, and on the 11th October, 1905, he prepared an affidavit for the complainant, to which he affixed a stamp of one rupee. ... The stamp vendor had no stamps, and looking through his papers, the appellant says, he found a rupee stamp which had been given him by one Francis Perera. This stamp....
a penalty of one rupee by the person tendering it”. ... rupee by the person tendering it. ... However, the revision petitioner/defendant has no locus standi to take undue advantage of the non-fixation of stamp duty by the respondent/plaintiff for the purpose of establishing his case in the Suit and thus, the revision petition is to be rejected. ... Accordingly, the final and decreetal order dated 22.09.20....
Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act can at best be one of the factors for consideration at the time of determination of the market value under the Indian Stamp Act.” 13. ... The minimum value fixed by the Collector is Rs. 55 lacs per hectare for agricultural land whereas the Collector has determined the market value at Rs. 210 lac per hectare i.e. four times over and above the minimum value fixed under the Rules, whic....
Therefore, as per Article 23 of Schedule I of the STAMP ACT , what has been fixed as the percentage of stamp duty would be collected. ... Therefore, 6 + 2 + 1 = 8% stamp duty, including 2% transfer duty + 1% registration fee had been fixed under G.O.Ms.No.177, dated 20.11.2003. ... duty as well as the registration charges as has been fixed by the provisions of the STAMP#HL_E....
or stamps in money, deducting [ten naya paise] for each rupee or portion of a rupee, upon such person delivering The Gift deed was executed and during the process of verification, certificates No. ... Petitioner in this present petition seeks the following relief: Briefly stated the facts in this petition are as under: p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:713....
The review petition against the said order was rejected. The GFIL Committee challenged the orders by filing Special Leave Petitions before the Supreme Court. One of the questions that arose for consideration was regarding refund of the stamp duty. ... deducting [ten naye paise] for each rupee or portion of a rupee, upon such person delivering up the same to be cancelled, and proving to the Collector's sat....
with a view to promoting large projects, having capital investment of Rupee 750 crores or more, is pleased to remit with effect from February 13, 2003, the stamp duty chargeable on the instruments of transfer under the said Act, executed for transfer of land in the interest of such project; p align ... For all the reasons stated above, the writ petition stands allowed. ... The petitioner, as stated above, has sought remission under the not....
O R D E R The relief sought for in this writ petition
The authorities are directed to refund the deficient stamp duty, if any, paid by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from date. 13. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. ... It is to be noted that the relevance of the spot verification carried out by the authorities themselves is paramount in nature and it is from such verification that the assessment was carried out by the authorities with regard to the natu....
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the land which was purchased by the petitioner is an agricultural land and the registration of the document was done after payment of the full stamp duty and verification of the subject land. ... Thereafter, a notice has been issued by the Respondent No. 3 dated 13.07.2015 stating that the valuation of the land is more than the one stated in the document i.e. ... This writ petitio....
Ex.A1 when treated as pro-note or acknowledgement of debt, registration is not required. For pro-note or a receipt of money one rupee stamp is sufficient. Therefore, this Court finds no merit in the appeal.
These certificates are issued for getting admission in the school and to seek job opportunities. (d) Residence denotes a place a person staying regularly. e) Nativity Certificate is issued subject to the applicant proving continuous residence for five years and above. 2. a) The applications for these should bear one Rupee Court Fee stamp.
2. a) The applications for these should bear one Rupee Court Fee stamp. These certificates are issued for getting admission in the school and to seek job opportunities. (d) Residence denotes a place a person staying regularly. e) Nativity Certificate is issued subject to the applicant proving continuous residence for five years and above.
Thumb impression has been fixed across the revenue stamp and which would not be if the thumb impression was allegedly for police verification as no revenue stamp is required in such application for police verification. Trial court notes that it is not disputed that the document Ex.PW1/1 admittedly bears the signatures of the appellant/defendant as also has thumb impression. Trial court has also rightly observed that there is no complaint made by the appellant/defendant that t....
The defendant has stated further that in the year 1998 the Stamp Act was amended and that instead of 0.20 paise stamp, one rupee stamp has to be affixed. However, even in the year 2002, only 0.40 paise stamp was affixed, which would show that the plaintiff had misused the pro note given to the said finance company.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
