Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The award of the PLA is final and cannot be challenged in any court or through appeal, except for judicial review under constitutional provisions ["Lahura Bai v. Chief General Manager South Eastern Coal Fields Limited Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) - Chhattisgarh"] ["Dilip Mehta VS Rakesh Gupta - Madhya Pradesh"].
Can the PLA cancel agreements for sale?
Analysis and Conclusion:The Permanent Lok Adalat possesses adjudicatory powers comparable to a civil court, and its awards are final, binding, and deemed to be decrees ["Dilip Mehta VS Rakesh Gupta - Supreme Court"]. These powers include deciding disputes related to agreements for sale, and in appropriate cases, the PLA can pass orders that may effectively cancel such agreements if the dispute warrants it. Nonetheless, the PLA's jurisdiction is confined to civil matters, and it cannot entertain disputes involving offences or criminal aspects. Therefore, while the PLA can cancel agreements for sale through its final awards, this authority is exercised within the scope of civil dispute resolution and does not equate to an overarching power to cancel agreements outside its jurisdiction ["Kannan VS Nallusamy - Madras"].
In the realm of real estate transactions in India, disputes between promoters and purchasers often lead parties to seek quick resolutions through alternative forums like the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA). A common question arises: Does the Permanent Lok Adalat have powers to cancel an agreement for sale between a promoter and a purchaser? This query is particularly relevant amid rising real estate litigation, where buyers seek remedies for delays, breaches, or fraud.
This article delves into the statutory framework, judicial interpretations, and limitations of the PLA's jurisdiction. While the PLA offers an efficient mechanism for certain disputes, its powers are strictly confined. Note that this is general information based on legal precedents and statutes; it is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Established under Chapter VI-A of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (inserted by the 2002 Amendment), the Permanent Lok Adalat is designed to promote pre-litigation conciliation and settlement for disputes related to public utility services. These services include transport, postal, telegraph, supply of power, water, sanitation, and others notified by the government. Chief Administrative Officer, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran VS Satish Gajanan Pradhan - 2022 Supreme(Bom) 723
Unlike regular Lok Adalats, which focus solely on conciliation, the PLA has limited adjudicatory powers. Its primary role is to facilitate amicable settlements. Only if conciliation fails does it proceed to decide the dispute—but with strict conditions. Section 22-C(8) states: Where the parties fail to reach at an agreement under sub-section (7), the Permanent Lok Adalat shall, if the dispute does not relate to any offence, decide the dispute.Canara Bank VS G. S. Jayarama - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 480
Awards by the PLA are final and binding, deemed decrees of a civil court under Section 22-E. However, this finality applies only within its narrow jurisdiction. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ajay Sinha - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 870
The PLA's functions emphasize conciliation over adjudication:- Pre-litigation stage: Any party can approach for disputes up to ₹1 crore (earlier limits were lower) related to public utility services. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited VS Rampal - 2020 Supreme(Del) 584- Conciliation first: Proceedings start non-adjudicatory; it morphs into adjudicatory only post-failed settlement. JEBBY M. ALIYAR vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2504- No offences: Cannot handle non-compoundable offences or disputes exceeding pecuniary limits.- Incidental powers: It may grant interim relief to prevent irreparable harm, guided by natural justice principles. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited VS Shyam Lal - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 2064
Key point: The PLA is not a full-fledged court. It lacks powers to declare contracts void, rescind agreements, or adjudicate complex title/ownership issues. Canara Bank VS G. S. Jayarama - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 480
No, the Permanent Lok Adalat does not have the power to cancel or rescind agreements for sale between promoters and purchasers. Its jurisdiction is limited to public utility services, and real estate sale agreements typically fall outside this scope unless directly linked (e.g., utility supply in a project). United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ajay Sinha - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 870
The Act's emphasis is on settlement, not annulment. Even when deciding on merits, it cannot extend to cancelling contracts. As held in precedents: The Permanent Lok Adalat is to conduct proceedings to reach an amicable settlement. If no settlement is reached, it can decide disputes only if they do not relate to offences. It lacks authority over sale, transfer, or ownership rights. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ajay Sinha - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 870
In one case, the PLA's award upholding a property transfer in violation of allotment conditions was set aside by the High Court, underscoring misinterpretation of terms and lack of power to override prohibitions. Haryana Urban Development Authority, Sirsa VS Bimla Devi - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 3022
Courts have consistently restricted the PLA's role:- Supreme Court insights: PLA is not a substitute for civil courts in contractual rights or title disputes. Its role is pre-litigation resolution for public utilities. Canara Bank VS G. S. Jayarama - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 480- Distinction from regular Lok Adalats: PLA has adjudicatory powers for non-offence disputes post-conciliation, unlike conciliatory-only Lok Adalats. Yet, this doesn't extend to contract cancellation. JEBBY M. ALIYAR vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 2504- Pension and utility cases: Jurisdiction upheld for pension recovery as a public utility, but not for broader contractual rescission. Chief Administrative Officer, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran VS Satish Gajanan Pradhan - 2022 Supreme(Bom) 723- Motor accident claims: PLA followed mandatory procedure under Section 22-C but held liable the registered owner, without cancelling underlying agreements. Balbir Singh, s/o Surjit Singh VS State of Jharkhand - 2023 Supreme(Jhk) 817
Awards are challengeable if beyond jurisdiction, as seen in electricity misuse disputes where PLA overstepped into adjudicating barred matters under the Electricity Act. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited VS Rampal - 2020 Supreme(Del) 584
Post-RERA (Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016), real estate complaints have dedicated forums. Courts have ruled that PLA lacks jurisdiction over RERA-covered disputes. In a Kerala High Court case, PLA correctly dismissed a real estate refund complaint due to RERA's ouster of civil court jurisdiction, including PLA. The court established that RERA provisions exclude the jurisdiction of civil courts, confirming the Permanent Lok Adalat's lack of power to entertain complaints under real estate transactions.SANTHOSH T.N, Vs PERMANENT LOK ADALAT, - 2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46644
RERA Sections 18, 79, and 71 provide specific remedies like refunds with interest, bypassing PLA. Allottees are financial creditors under IBC amendments, but PLA isn't the venue. MANISH KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA - 2021 Supreme(SC) 23Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited VS Union of India - 2019 Supreme(SC) 843
Even for utilities in real estate (e.g., electricity), specific statutes like Electricity Act prevail if they bar adjudication. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited VS Rampal - 2020 Supreme(Del) 584
Parties should prioritize statutory remedies to avoid jurisdictional challenges. Vimala Devi Tawari VS Ashok Kumar Sadh - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 2795
In conclusion, while the PLA streamlines certain resolutions, its powers do not extend to rescinding promoter-purchaser sale agreements. Relying on it for such relief risks rejection and delays. For tailored guidance, seek professional legal counsel. Stay informed on evolving laws like RERA and IBC for effective dispute management. Canara Bank VS G. S. Jayarama - 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 480United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ajay Sinha - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 870
#PermanentLokAdalat #RealEstateLaw #LokAdalatPowers
According to the Lok Adalat award, three months time was granted to the defendant/judgment debtor to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/-. In the event of payment of the said amount, then the plaintiff/decree holder agreed to cancel the sale deed and to withdraw the suit in O.S.No.79 of 1997. ... Thomas Job) and would contend that if any time limit specified in Lok Adalat award, the Court is competent to extend the time in appropriate cases. The above reported judgment has also further held that t....
(2) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court. (3) The award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be by a majority of the persons constituting the Permanent Lok Adalat. ... (1) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act made either on merit or in terms of a settlement agreement#H....
Union of India and others [(2019) 8 SCC 416], the learned counsel submits that the Permanent Lok Adalat and the Real Estate Regulatory Authority would have concurrent powers and the finding that the Permanent Lok Adalat does not have the jurisdiction to consider the issue is per se illegal. ... It is stated that all that is ousted is the jurisdiction of “civil courts” to entertain “any suit or proceeding” and that since the Permanent Lok#HL....
... (8) Where the parties fail to reach at an agreement under sub-section (7), the Permanent Lok Adalat shall, if the dispute did not relate to any offence, decide the dispute. ... 22D. ... observations and in case the parties reach at an agreement on the settlement of the dispute, they shall sign the settlement agreement and the Permanent Lok Adalat shall pass an award in terms thereof and furnish a copy of the same to each of the ....
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the powers contained in sub-section (1), every Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat shall have the requisite powers to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. ... Powers of Lok Adalats.— (1) The Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat shall, for the purposes of holdi....
The impugned award dated 15.05.2014 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Sirsa, is set aside. ... The Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Sirsa has also held that respondent No.1 is a bonafide purchaser for consideration and that a period of nearly nine years had already elapsed when the transaction in question took place. ... To this above aspect, the Permanent Lok Adala....
There is a clear distinction with regard to the powers exercised by the Lok Adalat and the Permanent Lok Adalat. ... The Permanent Lok Adalat is entrusted with adjudicatory powers and for that precise reason, the Legislature has clearly conferred such power upon the Permanent Lok Adalat to decide disputes, on merits, which do not relate to any offence. ... On a ....
Powers of Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok Adalat. ... the agreement and then the Permanent Lok Adalat would pass an award in terms thereof and provide a copy of the same to each of the party concerned. ... (2) Without prejudice to the generality of the powers contained in sub-section (1), every 2 Lok Adalat or Permanent Lok #HL_S....
While the jurisdiction of the Permanent Lok Adalat is limited to disputes regarding public utility services, crucially, its powers are wider than the Lok Adalat in many respects:" Thereafter, their Lordships further held that an application made to the Permanent Lok Adalat ousts ... Award of Permanent Lok Adalat to be final. - (1) Every award of the Permanent #H....
the Permanent Lok Adalat. ... intervened and conferred power of adjudication upon the Permanent Lok Adalat.” ... CG-04A/8394 which he had transferred to the respondent no.3 through an agreement for sale dated 12th April 2004. According to the appellant, by virtue of the said agreement for sale he was indemnified from all liabilities arising from or of the aforesaid motor vehicle. ... If the party present before the....
At this stage, it would be useful to refer to Section 22 which provides for the powers of Lok Adalat and after the 2002 Amendment also for powers of Permanent Lok Adalat. It is pertinent to note that Section 22 of the said Act originally referred to the powers of the Lok Adalat but after the Amendment Act of 2002, even the Permanent Lok Adalat has been invested with the same powers and the said Section 22 now which refers to powers of both the Lok Adalat and the Permanent Lok Adalat. It provides that both the Lok Adalat and the Permanent Lok Adalat have th....
Provided that where any promoter fails to pay all or any of the outgoings collected by him from the allottees or any liability, mortgage loan and interest thereon before transferring the real estate project to such allottees, or the association of the allottees, as the case may be, the promoter shall continue to be liable, even after the transfer of the property, to pay such outgoings and penal charges, if any, to the authority or person to whom they are payable and be liable for the cost of any legal proceedings which may be taken therefor by such authority or person; (h) after he executes ....
Only if the parties fail to reach an agreement by conciliation, the Permanent Lok Adalat mutates into an adjudicatory body, by deciding the dispute. The nature of proceedings before the Permanent Lok Adalat is initially a conciliation which is non-adjudicatory in nature. In Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (supra) the Supreme Court has explained the essential nature of the proceedings before a Permanent Lok Adalat, and the difference between a Lok Adalat and a Permanent Lok Adalat in the following words: "27.
(6) The promoter shall prepare and maintain all such other details as may be specified, from time to time, by regulations made by the Authority. Provided that the allottee may approach the Authority for relief, if he is aggrieved by such cancellation and such cancellation is not in accordance with the terms of the agreement for sale, unilateral and without any sufficient cause. Provided that where any promoter fails to pay all or any of the outgoings collected by him from the allottees or any liability, mortgage loan and interest thereon before transferring the real estate project to such al....
While section 19 deals with organisation of Lok Adalats; sections 20, 21 and 22 deal with cognizance of cases by Lok Adalats, award of Lok Adalat and powers of Lok Adalat or permanent Lok Adalat respectively. 8. THE expression "Lok Adalat" defined in clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Act means a Lok Adalat organised under Chapter VI of the Act. And Chapter VI of the Act contains sections 19-22 of the Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
