Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
References:- ["Rahul Kumar Singh VS State Of Bihar - Patna"]- ["SHARNAPPA S/O MALLIKARJUNAPPA MUCHANDI Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, - Karnataka"]- ["SRI NAGARAJAIAH Vs BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY - Karnataka"]
In high-profile criminal investigations, particularly terrorism cases, the role of police in seizing mobile phones—often abbreviated as MOB in court records—and associated SIM cards (commonly referred to as MOB cards) is crucial. The query MOB card by police judgement highlights a common legal concern: how courts evaluate such seizures, their evidentiary value, and procedural validity. This blog delves into landmark judgments, focusing on the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, while integrating insights from other Indian rulings. Note that this is general information based on public judgments and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.
In Indian legal parlance, MOB frequently denotes mobile handsets seized by police, with MOB cards referring to SIM cards or related exhibits. These seizures are pivotal in tracing criminal activities, as seen in terror prosecutions. For instance, in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks judgment, police recovered Nokia 1200 mobiles and SIMs from attack sites like Hotel Taj, Oberoi, and Nariman House. MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1
The court meticulously analyzed these items: Police seized five Nokia 1200 mobile phones with associated SIM cards displaying numbers 9910719424, 9820704561, and 9819464530, used by terrorists for communication. MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1 This underscores how MOB cards enable location concealment and communication with handlers.
Beyond terror cases, MOB cards appear in various contexts. In a Karnataka High Court ruling, an MOB card has opened against the petitioner under Order No.1324 of the Karnataka Police Manual, flagging criminal antecedents that impacted employment recommendations. SRI NAGARAJAIAH Vs BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY Similarly, in narcotics cases, exhibits like MOB 1 is redmi mobile handset seized by police, MOB 2 is Itell mobile handset seized by police highlight routine seizures. Bhapo Marphew Son of Late Landong Marphew vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 367
The primary judgment scrutinized seizures from terror sites: two phones from Hotel Taj (Exhibits 749, 760), two from Nariman House (Exhibit 771), and one from Hotel Oberoi (Exhibit 790). Key IMEI numbers included 353526024049451 (unused Airtel SIM), 353526025840890 (fake SIM 9910719424), and others linked to victims. MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1
One SIM 9910719424 was fraudulently obtained in Delhi under the fake identity Suresh Prasad. Others, like 9819464530 from victim Gabriel Holtzberg and 9820704561 from Rita Agarwal, were snatched and repurposed. The terrorists at Hotel Taj were using a Sim card that was obtained in India under a fictitious name Suresh Praad on the basis of fake identity documents. The terrorists at Nariman House and Hotel Oberoi used Sim cards snatched from their respective victims... MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1
Evidentiary strength came from Nokia Inc.'s records (Exhibit 606), confirming manufacture in DongGuan, China, and shipment to Pakistan in June 2008 to vendors like United Mobile and I2 Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. This linked devices to foreign supply chains, bolstering the prosecution. MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1
No procedural exceptions were noted; the focus was on evidential value. A great many mobile phones were collected and seized from the various places through which the terrorists had passed... But of interest to us are only five (5) mobile phones... MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1
Police MOB card seizures extend beyond terrorism. In NDPS Act cases, courts uphold convictions despite minor procedural lapses if possession is proven. P.ex. 22 is inventory of seized narcotic drugs... MOB 1 is redmi mobile handset seized by police... The prosecution must establish possession beyond reasonable doubt. Bhapo Marphew Son of Late Landong Marphew vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 367
In corruption probes, disturbances by mobs led to additional FIRs, with witnesses detailing pre-trap activities and recoveries. Nageshwar Choudhary VS State Of Bihar - 2007 Supreme(Pat) 1641 Mob control scenarios also arise, as in Bombay Police Act cases where police ordered dispersal amid stone-pelting: Since mob was having lethal weapons... a message was transmitted to the police mobile... STATE OF GUJARAT VS ABDUL VAHAB ABDULHAKIM MULLA - 2018 Supreme(Guj) 307
High Courts intervene in procedural fairness. For instance, in a case involving police action against a mob, allegations of excessive force were examined, but jurisdiction issues under the Atrocity Act ousted magistrate courts post-amendment. On perusal of the material placed on record, it is clearly found that the allegation made in the impugned complaint is regarding excessive use of force by the police, when the police went to the place of occurrence to control the mob... Anand Athabhai Chaudhari VS State of Gujarat - 2019 Supreme(Guj) 263
Procession management cases emphasize police discretion: In case there is any crisis which the police authorities feel would flair up the situation resulting in any form of violence, the police authorities would disperse the procession and/or mob... Sufism Madaria Organisation vs The State of West Bengal - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2707
Rape and atrocity cases reference MOB details indirectly, like having Mob... or Vivo mobiles in arrest contexts. SIRAJ ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Unruly mobs scaling gates and assaulting police also lead to charges under IPC sections. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2019 Supreme(Cal) 49
Courts stress IMEI/SIM tracing with international cooperation. In the 26/11 case, Nokia's shipment details were decisive. Generally, police should:- Document seizures with detailed exhibits.- Prioritize manufacturer records for origin proof.- Link SIMs to fraudulent procurement or victim sources.
Recommendations from the judgment: In criminal investigations involving terror or mobile-enabled crimes, police should prioritize IMEI/SIM tracing with international manufacturer cooperation... Retain detailed exhibits for court validation. MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1
Other rulings reinforce this. In CBI probes, cooperation between agencies is vital, avoiding jurisdictional overreach. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2019 Supreme(Cal) 49 Transfers to CBI are not automatic despite police complicity apprehensions. SUPRABHA TYAGI VS STATE OF U. P. - 2015 Supreme(All) 821GOPAL GUPTA VS STATE OF U. P. - 2014 Supreme(All) 1449
Police play a vital role in safeguarding freedoms through fair investigations, as echoed in multiple judgments. SUPRABHA TYAGI VS STATE OF U. P. - 2015 Supreme(All) 821GOPAL GUPTA VS STATE OF U. P. - 2014 Supreme(All) 1449
In summary, MOB card seizures by police, as analyzed in these judgments, exemplify forensic prowess in prosecutions. While the 26/11 case sets a benchmark for terror links, parallel rulings illustrate everyday criminal applications. Always seek professional legal counsel for case-specific strategies.
References:1. MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1: Core 26/11 judgment on MOB seizures.2. SRI NAGARAJAIAH Vs BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY: MOB card for antecedents.3. Bhapo Marphew Son of Late Landong Marphew vs State of AP represented by the PP of AP - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 367: Narcotics MOB exhibits.4. Others as cited inline.
#MOBCardSeizure, #PoliceJudgment, #MumbaiAttacksCase
JUDGEMENT ... 1. Heard learned counsel fpr the parties. ... 2. ... No. 2156 of 2007, arising out of Rajpur Police Station Case No. 29 of 2007, by which cognizance for offences under Sections 447, 341, 324, 307/34 I.P.C. has been taken against the petitioner, though police after investigation had submitted final form opining that petitioner is innocent. ... The petitioner submits that even assuming the prosecution case to be true, the petitioner may be said to be a member of mob and only allegation against him is that he....
The said petition was allowed in terms of the order dated 11.02.2016 with a direction to the police to remove the name of the petitioner from MOB card within six days from the date of receipt of certified ... ) Card bearing No.DCRBMOB No.2554. ... These writ appeals are arising out of the judgement dated 08.06.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.102739/2016 C/w. W.P.No.103078/2016. ... Since these two appeals are 4 arising from the common judgement, both the appeals are taken up t....
The said petition was allowed in terms of the order dated 11.02.2016 with a direction to the police to remove the name of the petitioner from MOB card within six days from the date of receipt of certified ... ) Card bearing No.DCRBMOB No.2554. ... These writ appeals are arising out of the judgement dated 08.06.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.102739/2016 C/w. W.P.No.103078/2016. ... Since these two appeals are 4 arising from the common judgement, both the appeals are taken up t....
This Court while referring to the provisions contained in Order No.1324 of the Karnataka Police Manual, held that while entering the name of the person in MOB card, the requirement as found in order No.1324 of the Karnataka Police Manual, ... But , an MOB card has opened against the petitioner and therefore, it was recommended by the Police Inspector that the petitioner has criminal antecedents and therefore, he cannot be appointed by recommending to t....
Voter Card. ... In case there is any crisis which the police authorities feel would flair up the situation resulting in any form of violence, the police authorities would disperse the procession and/or mob by exercising their discretion. ... Diptendu Narayan Banerjee Heard On : 04.07.2025 Judgement On : 04.07.2025 Tirthankar Ghosh, J. ... As the learned advocate for the petitioner(s) submits that 750 participants would be participating in the said procession, the names of the participants should be for....
P.ex. 22 is inventory of seized narcotic drugs, along with his signature MOB 1 is redmi mobile handset seized by police, MOB 2 is Itell mobile handset seized by police. MOB 3 is Samsung mobile handset seized by police. MOB 4 is 3 Nos. of syringe with needle seized by police. ... MOB 5 is soap case in which contraband substance were found seized by police. MOB 7 to 9 are photographs, along with his....
This witness (P.W. 9) like P.W. 1 has further deposed about the pre-trap activity and the raid and recovery of Rs. 10.00 from Appellant and the disturbance by the mob leading to institution of the said F.I.R. by the vigilance team with Gandhi Maidan Police Station. ... P.W. 7 Hari Shankar Choubey was Sub-divisional Police officer in vigilance Department. ... Rizvi, Deputy Superintendent of Police (P.W. 13) and then a raiding party under the leadership of Binod Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police (P.W....
Superintendent of Police along with other police personnel came there from headquarter at Anand and he instructed to the mob to disperse, however, the persons from the mob continued to damage the properties and to set the properties at fire and even they threw stones on their police vehicles also and ... Rana, Police Inspector of Anand Police Station lodged the complaint with Vasad Police Station on 1/3/2002 at about 1.30 AM, which was registered as ....
having Mob. ... In case of his arrest at the hands of police, petitioner shall sustain irreparable loss. ... Thereafter, a call was received from Mob. ... As per Para 40, serial 6 of case diary, it is found that Chowdhurichak Bhatia, Dholahat, Bhagabanpur Mathurapur-1, South 24 Parganas(WB) but the said Vivo Company mobile and SIM Card
Since mob was having lethal weapons in their possession a message was transmitted to the police mobile and hence other police personnel were reinforced and ordered the mob to disperse but the mob did not comply with the order. ... The complainant along with other police personnel ordered mob to disperse, but the mob did not comply with the order and started pelting stones. ... P.W.9, police constable also do not disclose any specifi....
The evidence of both these witnesses shows that no report of abducting the accused was lodged either by them or by anybody. The incident of taking the accused was not reported to any law enforcing agency by any of them. The mob then took custody of the accused and took him to the police station.
As such, the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class can be said to be ousted. On perusal of the material placed on record, it is clearly found that the allegation made in the impugned complaint is regarding excessive use of force by the police, when the police went to the place of occurrence to control the mob, the members of the mob had assaulted the police. Even if the allegation made in the complaint is believed for sake of arguments, then, in that case, it clearly transpires that the action of the police was in discharging of their official duty ....
The mob turned unruly and forcefully scaled the main gate to enter into the hotel premises after manhandling members of police personnel standing guard to pacify the gathering. The mob wrested with the police from doing the lawful duty by applying criminal force upon them. The unruly members of the gathering barged inside, vandalised and ransacked the ground floor of the hotel premises causing damage to the glass door, glass furniture fixtures, LCD TV, printing machine etc. On the basis of the said complaint of Vinod Kumar, the General Manager of the hotel Ballygunge P.S. u....
In the said judgement itself role of police has been discussed as follows. Lord Denning has described the role of the police thus: “In safeguarding our freedoms, the police play vital role. 16. Apex Court once again in the case of Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary, 2014 (2) SCC 553, has emphasised that aim of investigation is ultimately to search for truth and bring the offender to book and Court may in appropriate cases intervene to protect personal/property rights of citizens.
Lord Denning has described the role of the police thus: “In safeguarding our freedoms, the police play vital role. 30. Apex Court once again in the case of Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary, 2014 (2) SCC 553, has emphasised that aim of investigation is ultimately to search for truth and bring the offender to book and Court may in appropriate cases intervene to protect personal/property rights of citizens. In the said judgement itself role of police has been discussed as follows.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
