Understanding Offences Under Sections 9 and 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006

Criminal Liability for Adult Men and Facilitators Under Sections 9 and 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act

Child marriage is a deeply rooted social challenge that the Indian legal system seeks to dismantle through stringent legislative measures. Central to this effort is the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 (PCMA), which seeks to protect minors from exploitation and penalize those who orchestrate or enter into such unions. For many navigating the legal complexities of these cases, the primary concern is understanding the specific offences under Section 9 and 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and the resulting legal consequences.

The Framework of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006

Before delving into the specific penalties, it is essential to understand how the Act defines its subjects. Under Section 2(b), a child is defined as a person who has not completed eighteen years of age in the case of a female and twenty-one years of age in the case of a male 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 869

Moidutty Musliyar VS Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station

One of the most critical aspects of the PCMA is that it declares child marriages voidable rather than automatically void. Under Section 3, the marriage is voidable at the option of the minor party, meaning the marriage remains valid unless the minor seeks an annulment. Furthermore, the Act is designed to apply universally; judicial interpretations have confirmed that the PCMA overrides personal laws, including Muslim Personal Law, when it comes to the prohibition of child marriage 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 869

Moidutty Musliyar VS Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station

Offence Under Section 9: Male Adults Marrying a Child

Section 9 is specifically designed to target the male party in a child marriage. It focuses on the responsibility of the adult to ensure the legality of the union. The statute stipulates that Whoever, being a male adult above eighteen years of age, marries a child, shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment up to two years or fine up to one lakh rupees or both.

For a conviction under Section 9, the prosecution must generally establish three key elements:1. The offender must be a male adult aged 18 or older.2. The bride must be a child (under 18 years of age).3. The act of marriage must have occurred, regardless of whether it was consensual or performed under religious customs 2020 5 Supreme 609.

An interesting judicial nuance arises when the groom is between 18 and 21 years old. Since the Act defines a male as a child until 21, courts have sometimes observed that Section 9 may not apply directly to these individuals, as the section is intended to target adults who promote or enable the marriage of children 2020 5 Supreme 609. In such instances, the legal remedy typically shifts toward annulment under Section 3.

The supremacy of the PCMA was underscored in a Kerala High Court ruling, which emphasized that the Act's application is based on citizenship rather than religion. The court held that a Muslim girl's marriage at puberty age is still punishable if she is under 18 years of age

Moidutty Musliyar VS Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station

Moidutty Musliyar VS Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station

Offence Under Section 10: Promoting or Permitting Child Marriage

While Section 9 targets the groom, Section 10 casts a wider net to ensure community and familial accountability. This section penalizes anyone who performs, conducts, directs, or abets a child marriage. The punishment is mirrored from Section 9: rigorous imprisonment for up to two years and/or a fine of up to one lakh rupees.

Liability under Section 10 can extend to:* Religious and Official Figures: Priests, marriage registrars, or anyone conducting the ceremony.* Family Members: Parents or guardians who arrange or permit the marriage.* Accomplices: Anyone aiding, promoting, or abetting the union 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 4123.

This provision ensures that the burden of law is not just on the spouse but on the entire ecosystem that facilitates the practice. However, the judiciary has clarified that the law targets the marriage itself, not the intent to marry. In certain cases, proceedings were quashed because the evidence only showed a betrothal or engagement, rather than an actual solemnized marriage 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49321.

Intersection with POCSO and the IPC

In practice, charges under the PCMA rarely exist in isolation. Depending on the facts, they often overlap with more severe statutes:* POCSO Act (Sections 5/6): If sexual intercourse occurs, the adult may face charges for aggravated penetrative sexual assault.* IPC (Sections 363/366): If the child was taken away from their guardians, charges of kidnapping or abduction for marriage may apply.

Courts frequently issue convictions under the PCMA alongside these laws. However, there are instances where a court may set aside a PCMA conviction if a more severe conviction under the POCSO Act is upheld 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1083 and 2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 4450.

Grounds for Quashing of Proceedings

Under Section 482 of the CrPC, High Courts have the power to quash FIRs or proceedings if they find that continuing the trial is not in the interest of justice. Common scenarios where this occurs include:

1. Attainment of Majority and Affirmation: If the girl has attained majority and the couple is living happily in a married relationship, courts often quash the charges to prioritize the welfare of the family over punitive action 2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 5856 and 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2635

   Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh VS State of Gujarat

   .
2. Lack of Mens Rea: If a priest or family member can prove they had no knowledge that the party was a minor, this may serve as a defense against the charges under Section 10 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68809.
3. Absence of Public Interest: In cases involving consensual teen romances where the parties have since matured and married, courts may view the offence as individual rather than a societal crime 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2635.

Key Takeaways and Legal Recourse

The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, provides a robust mechanism to combat child unions. For those affected by these laws, it is important to remember that child marriages are voidable, and the minor may seek annulment within two years of reaching majority 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1274 and 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1276.

Summary of Legal Consequences:* Section 9: Targets adult males; punishable by 2 years RI and/or ₹1 lakh fine.* Section 10: Targets facilitators (parents, priests); punishable by 2 years RI and/or ₹1 lakh fine.* Enforcement: Child Marriage Prohibition Officers are tasked with collecting evidence and preventing these unions 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 869.

While the law is strict, judicial discretion allows for the quashing of proceedings in specific circumstances, such as when the victim affirms the marriage after becoming an adult. Because these cases often overlap with the POCSO Act and the IPC, the legal stakes are high. This overview provides general insights from precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice; individuals facing such charges should consult a qualified advocate.