K. Palanisamy vs State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1083

G. JAYACHANDRAN
K. Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.R.Shase
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Kishore Kumar

JUDGMENT :

Prayer : Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order of conviction imposed in judgment dated 11.08.2016 made in Spl.S.C.No.28 of 2015 on the file of the District Magalir Sessions Court, Cuddalore by allowing this Criminal Appeal.

The Criminal Appeal is preferred by the sole accused being aggrieved by the order of conviction dated 11/08/2016 in Spl.S.C 28/2015 on the file District Magalir Sessions Court, Cuddalore.

2. The particulars of the offences and the terms of sentence imposed by the trial court are as under:-

Convicted for the offence under Sections by the trial Court	Conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court
Section 366-A IPC	Sentenced him to undergo 7 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo 1 year RI
Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006	Sentenced him to undergo 1 year RI
Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, (POCSO Act), 2012	Sentenced to undergo him to 10 years RI and to pay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1083

G. JAYACHANDRANK. Palanisamy – AppellantVersusState by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

G. JAYACHANDRAN
K. Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station – Respondent