Filing Perjury Case in Family Court for False Affidavit

In family disputes, affidavits play a crucial role in presenting facts to the court. However, when a petitioner submits a false affidavit, it undermines the judicial process and can lead to serious consequences. Many individuals wonder: Under which Provision we can File Case before Family Court to Action against Petitioner for Giving False Evidence under Affidavit? This blog explores the legal framework, procedures, and key considerations for initiating such action in India, drawing from established laws and judicial precedents.

While this information is for educational purposes and generally reflects legal principles, it is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.

Understanding Perjury and False Evidence in Family Courts

Perjury, or giving false evidence, is a grave offense that erodes trust in the judiciary. In family court proceedings—such as divorce, maintenance, or domestic violence cases—affidavits often contain sworn statements about income, assets, or events. If these are proven false, the affected party may seek action.

The courts have consistently emphasized the seriousness of this issue. As noted, perjury is a heinous offence and should be prosecuted independently of the main civil or matrimonial case

PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352

Key Legal Provisions Under Indian Penal Code (IPC)

The primary provisions for prosecuting false evidence are found in the Indian Penal Code, 1860:

• Section 191 IPC: Defines giving false evidence as making a false statement under oath or affirmation, knowing it to be false, with intent to deceive.
• Chapter XI IPC (Sections 191 to 229): Deals comprehensively with offenses relating to false evidence, false declaration, and fabricating false evidence. These provisions criminalize acts that obstruct the administration of justice

  PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352

  .

The Supreme Court has recognized that false affidavits and perjury undermine the integrity of judicial proceedings and has stressed the importance of stern action to curb such offences

PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352

Note that while the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, has replaced the IPC (e.g., Section 193 IPC now corresponds to Section 229 BNS), legacy cases and procedures often reference the IPC.

Procedure for Initiating Action: Role of CrPC Section 340

Family Courts handle matrimonial and family matters under the Family Courts Act, 1984, but perjury proceedings typically invoke criminal law. Here's the step-by-step process:

1. File a Complaint: Lodge a criminal complaint under IPC Sections 191 and Chapter XI. This can be:
2. Directly with the police for investigation.

3. As a private complaint before a Magistrate or the Family Court itself

   PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352

   .

4. Invoke Section 340 CrPC: This is a key procedural tool. When false evidence is detected during proceedings, the court may initiate an inquiry if it deems it expedient in the interests of justice.

5. The court held: The complaint or report of perjury can be filed with the police, and proceedings can be initiated under the relevant provisions of the IPC, without waiting for the conclusion of the main case

   PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352

   .

6. In one case, the Family Court directed action under Section 340 CrPC against a party for misleading the court on employment status, stating False evidence and misleading information in court proceedings are grounds for prosecution under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4175.

7. Evidence Requirement: Courts require proof of deliberate falsehood on a matter of substance. Mere suspicion or inaccuracies don't suffice. For instance:

8. There should be deliberate falsehood on a matter of substance – Court should be of prima facie opinion that there exists sufficient and reasonable ground to initiate proceedings 2024 6 Supreme 159.
9. Mere giving false evidence in a proceeding is not sufficient... It is only when Court is of opinion that a witness has willfully or knowingly given false evidence 2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 408.

Family Courts may direct the Registrar to file a complaint, as seen in cases where false affidavits were filed before higher courts 2024 6 Supreme 159.

Insights from Judicial Precedents

Courts exercise discretion but prioritize judicial integrity:

• Independent Prosecution: Perjury cases can proceed separately. No doubt giving of false evidence and filing false affidavits is an evil which must be effectively curbed with a strong hand but to start prosecution for perjury too readily... defeats its very purpose 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 468. Thus, strong evidence is key.

• Section 344 CrPC: For summary proceedings against witnesses. However, strict procedural compliance is mandatory: Section 344 of Cr.P.C. is an unique provision which allows the same Court... to take summary action... The Section provides as to what would be the requirement at the time of passing judgment 2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 733.

• Family Court Specifics: In maintenance cases, affidavits of assets are mandatory, and falsehoods invite scrutiny. One ruling noted the need for truthful disclosures, though not directly addressing perjury

  Aditi alias Mithi VS Jitesh Sharma - 2023 7 Supreme 322

  . Another upheld action for false pleas in housing society disputes under Sections 193/196 IPC via CrPC 340 2016 0 Supreme(Del) 1717.

• Acquittal Risks: Proceedings may be quashed if no willful falsehood is found, as in a rape case where the witness's denial didn't meet the threshold 2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 408.

These cases illustrate that while Family Courts can initiate inquiries, higher courts review for prima facie evidence.

Practical Recommendations

To strengthen your case:- Gather Evidence: Collect documents proving the affidavit's falsehood (e.g., bank statements contradicting income claims).- Timing: Act promptly but independently of the main case.- Avoid Overreach: Courts caution against frivolous complaints, as Denial simpliciter cannot meet the threshold, particularly when no malafide intention... can be understood 2024 6 Supreme 159.

It is advisable to approach the Family Court first for directions under Section 340 CrPC, or file directly under IPC provisions.

Exceptions and Limitations

• Discretion of Court: Action isn't automatic; it requires judicial opinion on expediency

  PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352

  .
• Pending Proceedings: No need to wait, but coordinate to avoid conflicts.
• Technical Grounds: Evidence must be recorded properly, e.g., not solely via affidavits in maintenance cases under CrPC 126(2) 2020 0 Supreme(AP) 283.

Key Takeaways

• Primary Provisions: IPC Section 191 and Chapter XI for substantive offenses.
• Procedural Tool: CrPC Section 340 for court-initiated inquiries.
• Evidence is Crucial: Prove deliberate, material falsehood.
• Independence: Perjury cases stand alone to uphold justice.

False affidavits threaten family court efficacy, but robust laws provide remedies. If facing such issues, document everything and seek expert guidance promptly. Stay informed, and protect your rights responsibly.

References:-

PRAVEEN R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA C VS ARPITHA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 352