Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) - The case of Rajesh Kumar Daria involves the interpretation of social reservations under Article 16(4) of the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court in Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission 2007 (8) SCC 785 clarified that reservations for SC, ST, and OBC are 'vertical reservations' and must be applied accordingly. The Rajasthan High Court has directed respondents to follow this Supreme Court decision in relevant cases P.V. Shalini vs State of Telangana - Telangana.
Legal Proceedings & Court Orders - Multiple cases involve high courts and the Supreme Court issuing directives to RPSC and other authorities to adhere to constitutional principles regarding reservations. For instance, the Rajasthan High Court has emphasized compliance with Supreme Court rulings in reservation matters MD. IMTIYAZ Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR - Patna.
Sub-Judice and RTI Matters - Several cases highlight that certain information related to ongoing court cases is protected under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, indicating that disclosure is barred when cases are sub-judice and do not serve larger public interest Radha Raman Tiwari vs Bank of Baroda - Central Information Commission.
Specific Case Context - The primary focus on Rajesh Kumar Thariya appears centered on legal disputes involving reservation policies, court directives, and compliance with constitutional mandates, rather than detailed personal or case-specific facts.
Analysis and Conclusion:The core issue in Rajesh Kumar Thariya Vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission pertains to the legal interpretation and application of reservation policies by the RPSC, with the Supreme Court establishing that reservations for SC, ST, and OBC are 'vertical' and must be applied as per constitutional guidelines. High courts have mandated adherence to these principles. Additionally, information related to ongoing legal proceedings is protected under RTI laws, emphasizing the judiciary's role in maintaining confidentiality during sub-judice periods. Overall, the case underscores the importance of constitutional compliance in reservation policies and judicial oversight to ensure fairness and legality.
References:- Supreme Court of India, Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission 2007 (8) SCC 785- Rajasthan High Court directives MD. IMTIYAZ Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR - Patna- RTI Act, Section 8(1)(j) Radha Raman Tiwari vs Bank of Baroda - Central Information Commission
In the realm of public sector recruitments in India, few issues spark as much debate as the application of reservation policies. The case of Rajesh Kumar Thariya vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) highlights critical tensions between affirmative action, merit-based selection, and constitutional mandates. This blog post delves into the legal question at the heart of the matter: Rajesh Kumar Thariya Vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission.
Drawing from judicial analyses and precedents, we'll unpack how courts scrutinize RPSC's recruitment processes, particularly regarding reservation implementation. Whether you're a job aspirant, legal enthusiast, or HR professional, understanding these principles can shed light on fairness in government hiring. Note: This is general information based on available case analyses and not specific legal advice.
The primary contention in Rajesh Kumar Thariya's challenge revolves around allegations of incorrect application of reservation policies by RPSC. Courts have consistently emphasized that reservations must align with Supreme Court directives to avoid compromising merit. For instance, excess reservation or misclassification can lead to the entire process being invalidated. Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956
Key documents reveal that RPSC recruitments often face judicial oversight when:- Reservation for categories like women is treated as vertical rather than horizontal.- Merit lists are diluted by improper roster adjustments.- Procedural irregularities undermine the selection's legality. Manoj Kumar Tungariya VS State of Rajasthan - 2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 2078Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956
In such scenarios, courts may direct re-evaluation or fresh selection, reinforcing that reservation cannot compromise merit and that any deviation must be legally justified. Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956
A cornerstone precedent is Rajesh Kumar Daria vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission, reported in (2007) 8 SCC 785. The Supreme Court clarified that reservations for SC, ST, and OBC are 'vertical reservations' and must be applied post-open competition, without adjusting merit lists unfairly. Gyamar Tana S/o Lt. Gyamar Tamu vs APPSC - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 179 - 2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 179 [Meenal Shashikant Joglekar ] R/of Worli, Mumbai Vs State Of Maharashtra, ] Through Information & Public Relations Dept. - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 103 - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 103](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/00400074067)
Women's reservation, conversely, is horizontal, cutting across categories without bypassing merit. Misapplying this—such as granting excess spots—violates Article 16(4) of the Constitution. The Rajasthan High Court has directed RPSC to adhere to this in multiple matters. P.V. Shalini vs State of Telangana - Telangana
Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission reported in (2007) 8 SCC 785 underscores: reservations under Article 16(4) are vertical and must follow constitutional guidelines. Suneeta Bharti VS State Of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 456 - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 456
Courts exercise a limited supervisory role, intervening only for arbitrariness, irrationality, or legal violations. In recruitment and exam processes, like answer key moderation or result declaration, interference is rare unless flaws are evident. Amit Swami S/o Shri Gajjanand Swami VS State of Rajasthan - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 598State of Rajasthan VS The Staff Council, Shri Mahesh Teachers’ College - 1993 0 Supreme(Raj) 573
For example:- Courts decline to re-assess merit absent clear violations.- Expert bodies like RPSC enjoy deference, but not at the cost of rule-breaking.- Violations, such as incorrect roster application, warrant quashing results. Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956
The courts have also emphasized that the process of evaluation... is subject to judicial review only in cases of arbitrariness or irrationality. Amit Swami S/o Shri Gajjanand Swami VS State of Rajasthan - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 598
Though exact timelines for Thariya's petition aren't detailed, the pattern mirrors broader RPSC challenges: claims of improper reservation, merit dilution, or procedural lapses. If RPSC deviated from Supreme Court norms—like excess women's reservation—the court could set aside outcomes. Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956
Related sources confirm RPSC's recurring scrutiny:- Directives to follow Rajesh Kumar Daria in reservation rosters. AARTI DEVI SHARMA D/O MAHESH CHAND SHARMA vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan- High Court mandates for constitutional compliance in recruitments. MD. IMTIYAZ Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR - Patna
In Rajesh Kumar Daria, the Supreme Court invalidated selections due to flawed reservation math, a principle applicable here. Courts won't hesitate if merit is compromised. Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956
Additional cases reinforce these themes:- Anil Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. (1995) and others stress correct reservation implementation. [Meenal Shashikant Joglekar ] R/of Worli, Mumbai Vs State Of Maharashtra, ] Through Information & Public Relations Dept. - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 103 - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 103](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/00400074067)- RTI protections under Section 8(1)(j) shield sub-judice details, prioritizing judicial process. Radha Raman Tiwari vs Bank of Baroda - Central Information Commission- Chhattisgarh and other PSCs face similar writs, highlighting nationwide consistency. HARISHANKAR VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - ChhattisgarhSATISH KUMARVSSTAFF SELECTION COMMISSION - Central Administrative Tribunal
In this case, the number of candidates to be selected under general category... were earmarked for women. Rajesh Kumar Daria Case Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission. P. Rajendran VS Government of Puducherry, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Puducherry - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 1706 - 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1706
The Rajasthan High Court has repeatedly urged adherence, as in directives against arbitrary selections. AARTI DEVI SHARMA D/O MAHESH CHAND SHARMA vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
Judicial restraint is key:- No interference in expert decisions without arbitrariness. Amit Swami S/o Shri Gajjanand Swami VS State of Rajasthan - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 598- Properly implemented reservations are upheld.- Challengers must prove violations; courts won't substitute judgment.
For aspirants facing RPSC processes, monitor rosters and guidelines. Authorities: Document compliance meticulously.
The Rajesh Kumar Thariya vs RPSC saga exemplifies judicial vigilance in balancing equity and merit. Precedents like Rajesh Kumar Daria (2007) 8 SCC 785 set enduring benchmarks, ensuring reservations serve constitutional goals without arbitrariness. While courts intervene sparingly, violations invite robust correction—potentially invalidating entire recruitments. Naresh Kumar Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 956Manoj Kumar Tungariya VS State of Rajasthan - 2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 2078
Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence. For personalized guidance, consult a legal expert.
Word count: 1028. This analysis draws solely from referenced materials.
#RPSCReservation, #LegalRuling, #SupremeCourt
Shailendra Kumar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Forbesganj (Simraha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 376 of 2021 Mr.Shantanu Kumar Mr. ... Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. ... IMTIYAZ S/o LATE KABURUDDIN @ KABIR @ KABIRUDDIN, R/o VILLAGE-THARIYA....
Kumar-Daria V Rajasthan Public Service Commission. ... Rajasthan Public Service Commission and the orders in the reference 6th read above. ... The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held in the case of Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission [2007(8) SCC 785] that, '....
Satish Kumar, S/o Sh. Basti Ram Yadav, R/o VPO – Sherpur, Tehsil-Behror, Dist. Alwar, Rajasthan, Aged about 24 years 2. ... Rajesh Sharma, R/o 10 (SF), E-4/Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi-110085 Aged about 22 years 3. Priyanka Saini, D/o Sh. ... Staff Selection Commision (Northern Region) Through its Regional Director, Block No.12, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110504 (By Ad....
Service Commision Through Its Secretary, Shankar Nagar Road, Bhagat Singh Square Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... 4 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, Shanker Nagar Road, Bhagat Singh Square, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... 4 - Examination Controller Chhattisgareh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Road, Bhagat Singh Square Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... , Indravati Bh....
Rajasthan Public Service Commision, Through Its ... Secretary, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ... Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan. ... HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ... The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:281pt;left:159pt
WRIT PETITION NO. 2411 OF 2021 Upendra S/o Madhavrao Kulkarni, Age; 55 years, Occ; In service ... s/o Pandurang Maindre, Age; 56 years, Occ; In service as Sectional Pramod s/o Bhaskarrao Pathrikar, Mangesh s/o Vasantrao Kulkarni Age; 54 years, Occ; In Service
WRIT PETITION NO. 2411 OF 2021 Upendra S/o Madhavrao Kulkarni, Age; 55 years, Occ; In service ... s/o Pandurang Maindre, Age; 56 years, Occ; In service as Sectional Pramod s/o Bhaskarrao Pathrikar, Mangesh s/o Vasantrao Kulkarni Age; 54 years, Occ; In Service
The appellant and on behalf of the respondent Shri Rajesh Sharma, Deputy General Manager and CPIO, Bank of Baroda, Vadodara, attended the hearing through video conference. 5.1. ... The matter is sub-judice before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the disclosure of which has no relevance to larger public interest and therefore it is exempted under section 8(1) (j)of the RTI Act, 2005. ... The matter is sub-judice before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the di....
Examinar Chhattisgarh Public Service Commision Through Shankar Nagar , Road, Raipur , Chhattisgarh Pin Code 492 Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Ra....
Examinar Chhattisgarh Public Service Commision Through Shankar Nagar , Road, Raipur , Chhattisgarh Pin Code 492 Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Ra....
8.1. Mr. Tagum, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the following decisions in support of his submission: (iii) Union of India vs. National Federation of the Blind reported in ( (ii) Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation vs. Union of India and Anr. , reported in (2014) 14 SCC 383 (i) Rajesh Kumar Daria vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission and Ors. , reported in (2007) 8 SCC 785
![Meenal Shashikant Joglekar ] R/of Worli, Mumbai Vs State Of Maharashtra, ] Through Information & Public Relations Dept. - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 103](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Bombay_small_3.png)
Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Ors. with connected matter, 2007 INSC 761 Anil Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., 1995 INSC 428 Food Corporation of India & Ors. Vs. Bhanu Lodh & Ors., 2005 INSC 104 Kanchan Vishwanath Jagtap Vs. Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur & Ors., 2016 (1) Mh.L.J. 934
(d) Rajesh Kumar & Ors. etc. Versus State of Bihar & Ors. etc., reported in (2013) 4 SCC 690; (e) Vikas Pratap Singh & Others Versus State of Chhattishgarh & Others reported in (2013) 14 SCC 494; and (b) Tridip Kumar Dingal & Others Versus State of West Bengal & Others, reported in (2009) 1 SCC 768; (c) Rajesh Kumar Daria Versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission reported in (2007) 8 SCC 785;
It is also well settled that those candidates who had taken part in the selection process knowing fully well the procedure laid down therein were not entitled to question the same. (See Munindra Kumar v. Rajiv Govil and Rashmi Mishra v. M.P. Public Service Commision.)” Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Others (2009) 15 SCC 458 has held that a decision rendered in ignorance of a binding precedent will have to be held as a decision rendered per incuriam. In that li....
In this case, the number of candidates to be selected under general category (open competition), were 59, out of which 11 were earmarked for women. Rajesh Kumar Daria Case Vs.Rajasthan Public Service Commission (iii). Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission reported in (AIR 2007 SC 3127) A.P.Publice Service Commission Vs. Baloji Badhavath & others cases are also considered.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
