Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Licensing Requirement for Money Lending - Companies or individuals offering loans must be licensed under the relevant Malaysian laws, such as the Moneylenders Act 1951 or the Money Lending Ordinance 1918, to legally carry out money lending activities. Non-compliance renders the transactions unenforceable or illegal ["SOCKALINGAM CHETTIAR et al. v. RAMANAYAKE et al."]; ["SHIM VUI GEH vs DAYANG MASTURA SAHARI & ANOTHER APPEAL - Court Of Appeal"].
Compliance with the Money Lending Act - Companies licensed by the Security Commission of Malaysia or relevant authorities are generally required to adhere to the provisions of the Money Lending Act, including proper documentation, licensing, and operational standards. For example, the Act mandates that moneylenders must be licensed and follow prescribed procedures for lending and security documentation ["SHIM VUI GEH vs DAYANG MASTURA SAHARI & ANOTHER APPEAL - Court Of Appeal"]; ["GOLDEN WHEEL CREDIT SDN BHD vs DATO SIAH TEONG DIN - High Court"].
Legality of Lending Activities - Giving out loans without a license or outside the scope of licensing laws is unlawful. Such transactions can be deemed invalid or void, especially if they violate licensing requirements or procedural obligations under the law ["SOCKALINGAM CHETTIAR et al. v. RAMANAYAKE et al."]; ["SHIM VUI GEH vs DAYANG MASTURA SAHARI & ANOTHER APPEAL - Court Of Appeal"].
Role of the Security Commission - The Security Commission of Malaysia regulates licensed moneylenders, and their licensing implies compliance with the Money Lending Act. Companies licensed by the Security Commission are presumed to be authorized to lend money legally, provided they adhere to all legal requirements ["SHIM VUI GEH vs DAYANG MASTURA SAHARI & ANOTHER APPEAL - Court Of Appeal"].
Main Point & Conclusion - A company licensed by the Security Commission of Malaysia to give out loans is required to comply with the Money Lending Act. This includes obtaining the proper license, following prescribed procedures, and adhering to legal standards. Failure to do so can result in the transactions being unenforceable or unlawful ["SOCKALINGAM CHETTIAR et al. v. RAMANAYAKE et al."]; ["SHIM VUI GEH vs DAYANG MASTURA SAHARI & ANOTHER APPEAL - Court Of Appeal"].
In the complex world of financial services in Malaysia, lenders often navigate multiple regulatory frameworks. A common question arises: Is the company licensed to give out loans by the Securities Commission of Malaysia (SC) required to comply with the Money Lending Act (MLA)? This issue is critical for businesses offering loans, as non-compliance can render agreements unenforceable and expose them to penalties.
This article explores the legal landscape, drawing from key judicial interpretations and regulatory principles. While this provides general insights, it is not legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
The Money Lending Act 1951 (MLA) is a cornerstone legislation designed to regulate moneylending activities, protect borrowers, and control interest rates and lender conduct. It defines a moneylender broadly as any person who carries on or advertises or holds himself out as carrying on the business of moneylending, whether or not he carries on other businesses TIONG SHIUN SAN & ORS vs LEE KIM JIUNG - 2020 MarsdenLR 1680.
Key provisions include:- Prohibition of unlicensed moneylending, making such agreements unenforceable LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233.- Mandatory licensing for all entities engaged in moneylending LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233.- Regulation of interest rates and borrower protections LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233.
The MLA's scope is wide, capturing anyone holding out as a moneylender, regardless of other business activities.
Licenses from the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) typically fall under frameworks like the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007, governing securities, investments, or digital lending platforms. These authorize specific financial services but do not automatically cover traditional moneylending FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY vs RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW - 2017 MarsdenLR 2860.
As clarified in legal documents, licensing by the Security Commission of Malaysia pertains to a different regulatory framework and does not exempt a company from complying with the MLA FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY vs RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW - 2017 MarsdenLR 2860. The MLA's licensing is distinct and must be obtained separately for moneylending operations.
No, a company licensed by the SC to give out loans is not automatically exempt from the MLA. Such SC authorization does not negate MLA compliance. Entities engaging in moneylending must adhere to MLA provisions, irrespective of SC licensing LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY vs RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW - 2017 MarsdenLR 2860.
In a pivotal case, the court examined Sale of Gold Agreements disguised as sales but constituting unlicensed moneylending. It ruled these void, emphasizing that the MLA prohibits unlicensed moneylending and mandates compliance with its provisions for all entities engaging in moneylending activities LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233. This underscores that other licenses do not supersede MLA requirements.
Courts have consistently upheld the MLA's primacy for moneylending. For instance:- Agreements by unlicensed lenders are unenforceable, even if structured creatively LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233.- The MLA regulates the business of moneylending, including licensing requirements and conduct LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233.
Comparative insights from related cases highlight nuances. In one ruling involving a licensed financial institution under the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989, the loan was deemed valid as it was not unlawful moneylending, but this pertained to secured credit under s 60(1), not a blanket exemption AMBANK (M) BERHAD vs KT STEEL SDN BHD & ORS. As the appellant is a licensed financial institution the alleged loan is not invalid AMBANK (M) BERHAD vs KT STEEL SDN BHD & ORS. However, this does not override MLA for pure moneylending.
In another context, even licensed moneylenders must comply with specific MLA subsections for certain loans, such as those to friends, rejecting arguments that they are mere incidentals KARUPPIAH PILLAI vs KAKA SINGH. A licensed moneylender who lends money interest free to friends must comply with sub-section (1) of s. 16 KARUPPIAH PILLAI vs KAKA SINGH.
International parallels, like under India's Kerala Money-Lenders Act, reinforce that prosecution requires proof of moneylending as a business, not occasional loans Manoj George, S/O. Late K. G. George VS State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor - 2024 Supreme(Ker) 1353. Mere allegations without evidence fail, but licensed status alone does not suffice.
No explicit exceptions exempt SC-licensed entities from MLA. Documents stress that multiple licenses may coexist, but compliance with the MLA remains obligatory for moneylending activities FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY vs RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW - 2017 MarsdenLR 2860.
Even licensed institutions face scrutiny if transactions resemble disguised loans, as seen in equipment lease cases distinguished from loans under the Bills of Sale Act AMBANK (M) BERHAD vs KT STEEL SDN BHD & ORS. The court found a genuine lease valid, noting ownership remains with the lessor, but warned against shams violating lending laws.
Businesses with SC licenses offering loans should:- Assess if activities qualify as moneylending under MLA definitions TIONG SHIUN SAN & ORS vs LEE KIM JIUNG - 2020 MarsdenLR 1680.- Obtain MLA licensing to ensure enforceability LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233.- Review agreements for compliance with interest caps and borrower protections.- Seek legal counsel to navigate overlapping regulations, avoiding pitfalls like unenforceable contracts or penalties.
Failure risks void agreements, as in cases where lower courts erred in classifying leases as loans AMBANK (M) BERHAD vs KT STEEL SDN BHD & ORS.
Malaysia's financial sector involves bodies like Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) and SC, each with distinct roles. While BNM oversees banks, SC handles capital markets. Moneylending falls squarely under MLA, administered by state authorities.
Related disputes, such as inter-corporate deposits or power of attorney loans, highlight limitation periods and authorization needs, but reinforce licensing scrutiny Kherapati Vanijya Limited VS Longview Tea Co. Limited - 2016 Supreme(Cal) 622Indian Bank VS City Hospitals and Anr.. For example, suits for loan recovery can be barred if filed beyond three years from last payment Kherapati Vanijya Limited VS Longview Tea Co. Limited - 2016 Supreme(Cal) 622.
Public interest concerns, like farmer indebtedness, echo MLA's protective intent, urging relief from unlicensed lenders The Secretary, All India Biodynamic and Organic Farming Association VS The Principal Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra - 2006 Supreme(Bom) 805.
In conclusion, while SC approval enables certain loan activities, it does not replace MLA obligations. Lenders must proactively comply to safeguard operations. For tailored advice, engage a Malaysian legal professional familiar with financial regulations.
References:1. LEE KUANG GEN vs TAN SRI DATO SERI DR M MAHADEVAN MAHALINGAM & OTHER APPEALS - 2023 MarsdenLR 1233 - MLA compliance and disguised moneylending.2. FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY vs RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW - 2017 MarsdenLR 2860 - Distinction from SC licensing.3. TIONG SHIUN SAN & ORS vs LEE KIM JIUNG - 2020 MarsdenLR 1680 - MLA definitions.4. Additional sources as cited inline.
#MoneyLendingAct, #SCMalaysia, #LoanCompliance
An issue has been framed as to whether these notes were enforceable by reason of a failure to give details required by section 10 of the Money Lending Ordinance (No. 2 of 1918), and the learned trial Judge has held that none of them are enforceable. ... Lenders' Act by taking the security in the registered name of the money lender as provided for by section 2, sub-section (1) (c) of the Act could not sue as the security was ill....
s 2 of the MA 1951 as: "'moneylending' means the lending of money at interest, with or without security, by a moneylender to a borrower." ... The particular Act was supposed to be required to save the foolish from the extortion of a certain class of the community who are called moneylenders as an offensive term. Moneylending is a perfectly respectable form of business. Nobody says that bankers are rascals because they lend money." ... [Emphasis Added] [42] Generally, a single #HL_STAR....
Balwant Singh for the plaintiff argues that a licensed moneylender may give loans to friends "as incidentals" without having to comply with sub-section (1) of s. 16 as, it is said, that provision applies only if the object of the loans is to promote his money-lending business, and Mr. ... Secondly, in my opinion a licensed moneylender who lends money interest free to friends must comply with sub-section (1) of s. 1....
Balwant Singh for the plaintiff argues that a licensed moneylender may give loans to friends "as incidentals" without having to comply with sub-section (1) of s. 16 as, it is said, that provision applies only if the object of the loans is to promote his money-lending business, and Mr. ... Secondly, in my opinion a licensed moneylender who lends money interest free to friends must comply with sub-section (1) of s. 1....
Balwant Singh for the plaintiff argues that a licensed moneylender may give loans to friends "as incidentals" without having to comply with sub-section (1) of s. 16 as, it is said, that provision applies only if the object of the loans is to promote his money-lending business, and Mr. ... The lending of money, in order to comply with subsection, must not be the primary object of the business. I do not think that M....
Balwant Singh for the plaintiff argues that a licensed moneylender may give loans to friends "as incidentals" without having to comply with sub-section (1) of s. 16 as, it is said, that provision applies only if the object of the loans is to promote his money-lending business, and Mr. ... Secondly, in my opinion a licensed moneylender who lends money interest free to friends must comply with sub-section (1) of s. 1....
(Note: s 60(1) of the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 reads "Subject to an order made by the Bank under subsection (2), no licensed institution shall give to any person any credit without security.") ... 1950 or an unlawful money lending transaction, that is, where the lender is an unlicensed money lender; as the appellant is a licensed financial institution the alleged loan is not invalid. ... lending or loan transa....
For secured loans, the proper and required forms ought to be the forms under Schedule K of the Moneylenders (Control and Licensing) Regulations 2003. ... other legislation or common law, even if there is non-compliance of the Moneylenders Act 1951 in the moneylending agreement, when there is nothing unlawful about the lending of money in connection with which it was given. ... [73] Furthermore, learned counsel for the plaintiff argues that the use of Form J was a genuine mistake as PW1 had wrongly proc....
Going by Section 3 of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, the same mandates the need for a license to carry on or continue business of money lending and the business shall be conducted in the licensed premises by any person, firm or joint family or association of individuals. ... Since the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506(i) IPC, under Section 3 r/w 17 of the Kerala Money Lenders Act and under Section 3 r/w 9....
Money and Banking in Malaysia by Bank Negara Malaysia, 30th Anniversary Edn. 1959-1989 has this to say; In 1977, the Sabah Development Bank Berhad was set up by the Sabah State Government to provide for medium and long term loans in Sabah to private and State ... Financial institutions, according to Money and Banking in Malaysia, Bank Negara Malaysia (1959-89) at p.204 include "the banks, the finance companies and institutions such as the MIDF and Sabah Development B....
Mr. Gandhi works as Accounts Officer of the plaintiff company. But save and except the oral testimony of Mr. Gandhi, there is nothing in writing to substantiate the said fact. It is expected that such discussion even on verbal term is required to be reduced in writing of the minutes of the company. The plaintiff is undoubtedly a limited company doing non-banking business lending money and providing loans to the borrowers.
4. Do the defendants prove No. that suit transaction as a loan transaction? 3. Do the defendants prove that No. plaintiff runs money lending business and advances loans to persons by depositing cheques as security with him? 5. Do the defendants prove that No. they have repaid cheque or the loan amount whatever due against them? 2.....
Admittedly, the 4th defendant company has not passed any resolution authorising Dr. T.M. Paul, to give General Power of Attorney to mortgage the property and to raise loans in Banks and financial institutions. This section clearly postulates that unless it is authorised by the special resolution of the lending company, no company can make any loan or give any guarantee or provide any security. Dr. T.M. Paul, in favour of the 2nd defendant in the OA, giving power to mortgage the schedule mentioned properties to raise loans in Banks and financial institutions, among other pow....
Wherever an input dealer has provided inputs like seeds, fertilizers and pesticides on credit, interest would be allowed to be charged at the rate at which the concerned District * Central Co-operative Bank gives crop loans to farmers; * All outstanding crop loans upto a limit of Rs.25,000 will be rescheduled in these districts; * * Farmers would not be required to repay loans and interest thereon advanced by non-licensed money lenders; * The following measures have been taken : 21.1 Measures Indebtedness.
Farmers would not be required to repay loans and interest thereon advanced by non-licensed money lenders; 2 ). Farmers would not be required to repay loans and interest thereon advanced by non-licensed money lenders; 2 ). Wherever an input dealer has provided inputs like seeds, fertilizers and pesticides on credit, interest would be allowed to be charged at the rate at which the concerned District Central cooperative bank gives crop loans to farmers; 3 ). All outstanding crop loans upto a limit of Rs. 25,000 will be rescheduled in these districts; 4 ). All....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
