FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY vs RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 MarsdenLR 2860

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY – Appellant
Versus
RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW – Respondent

Table of Content
1. judgment is based on the financial claims presented by the plaintiff. (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. overview of plaintiff's claims and defendant's admissions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. description of investment transactions and relationship dynamics. (Para 7 , 9 , 12 , 13)
4. court's evaluation of evidence regarding money lending. (Para 20 , 50 , 51)
5. consideration of evidence and financial transactions including post-dated cheques. (Para 26 , 30 , 41 , 44)
6. determination of transactional legality under the moneylenders act. (Para 49 , 60 , 61)
7. final ruling on the plaintiff's claims. (Para 62)
8. the concluding orders and successful claim outcome. (Para 63)

[1] These are my grounds of judgment with respect to the Plaintiff's suit against the Defendant for the return of balance of monies, which the Plaintiff says he had invested with the Defendant, and the profit return guaranteed by the Defendant on the investment.

[2] The Plaintiff is a citizen of the Republic of Ireland who lives and works in Malaysia. He is a director and majority shareholder of Vast Consortium Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian incorporated property development company. The Defendant is a Malaysian businessman who says that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 MarsdenLR 2860

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURFRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY – AppellantVersusRAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FRANCIS DAMIEN MURPHY – Appellant
Versus
RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW – Respondent