Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Discrepancies in Statements - Several sources highlight contradictions between the FIR, statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C., and other testimonies, which are often viewed as potential improvements or falsehoods. For example, sources MRS ASHWINI HEMANTH Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY POLICE INSPECTOR, - Karnataka_HC_KAHC010036982021 and 2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12191 discuss inconsistencies in complainants' statements and their implications for case validity ["MRS ASHWINI HEMANTH Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY POLICE INSPECTOR, - Karnataka"], ["2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12191"].
Effect on Case Validity - Courts have considered these discrepancies as grounds for quashing or setting aside cases, especially when the complainant's statement under Section 164 does not tally with initial FIR or other statements. For instance, in MRS ASHWINI HEMANTH Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY POLICE INSPECTOR, - Karnataka_HC_UPHC011807882021, contradictions in statements led to the conclusion that no case under certain sections was made out, and the case was dismissed ["MRS ASHWINI HEMANTH Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY POLICE INSPECTOR, - Karnataka"].
Right to Access Statements - Several judgments emphasize that the accused or petitioner has the right to obtain a copy of their statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., and failure to produce or record such statements properly can be grounds for quashing proceedings (2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16507), indicating procedural irregularities can lead to case dismissal.
Judicial Discretion and Quashing - Courts have quashed cases based on the absence of consistent statements, improper recording of statements, or when the statements under Section 164 do not support the allegations. For example, in 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2263 and 2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14835, the courts quashed proceedings due to procedural lapses or contradictions in evidence ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2263"], ["2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 14835"].
Analysis and Conclusion:When the statement made by the complainant under Section 164 Cr.P.C. does not tally with the facts as per the FIR or other evidence, and especially if the statement under Section 164 contradicts earlier statements or admissions (e.g., denying allegations made in FIR), courts have held that the case can be quashed. This is because such discrepancies undermine the credibility of the prosecution's case and may indicate abuse of process or false allegations. Therefore, if the Section 164 statement made by the complainant under oath before the Magistrate does not match the statement made during investigation or the FIR, it can serve as a strong ground for quashing the case under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or Article 226/227 of the Constitution.
cases have become a common legal battleground in India, especially in business transactions where trust is built on paper promises. When a cheque is dishonoured, the payee often turns to () for redress. But under what circumstances can a complainant file such a case, and what are the precise ingredients or grounds required?
This blog post breaks down the legal framework, drawing from judicial precedents and key analyses. Note: This is general information based on legal principles and case law. It is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Section 138 addresses the due to insufficient funds or other reasons, treating it as a punishable offence. It provides a swift civil-cum-criminal remedy for payees. Filing a complaint is straightforward but strictly conditional.
Under what circumstances can a complainant file a cheque case under Section 138 of the , and what are the ingredients or grounds for filing such a complaint?
The law mandates a sequence of events before a complaint can be lodged. Here's a step-by-step overview:
These are the core ingredients for a prima facie case. Courts have upheld that all must be satisfied for . 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318
The cheque must represent a genuine debt, not a blank or security instrument. Blank cheques or those without consideration fail this test.
The is crucial— it must specify the amount and give 15 days for payment. Defects here can lead to dismissal.
The original dishonour memo is key evidence. Photocopies may suffice if explained.
Once filed, the magistrate examines the complainant under . In some NI cases involving deeper probes, statements under may be recorded during investigation.
A common defence in cases involves challenging the complainant's credibility, especially via discrepancies in statements recorded under . Main Legal Finding: A discrepancy between the statement made by the complainant under before the Magistrate and subsequent evidence does not automatically warrant an NI case. These statements are primarily for or , not . 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318
Statements under are judicial records made during investigation to deter false changes in testimony. They are not but aid in assessing witness credibility. The holds they cannot form the sole basis for conviction. 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318 2010 3 Supreme 667
In , the Court observed that the Section 164 statement 'is not ' and can only be used for or . emerges at trial. 2010 3 Supreme 667
No, not automatically. Courts evaluate the entire evidence holistically, including oral testimony and documents. Mere mismatches do not vitiate the case. 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318
For NI cases, precedents reject solely on Section 164 inconsistencies if a prima facie case exists under Section 138 ingredients. The trial court proceeds, weighing all proof.
Other judgments highlight how Section 164 contradictions play out, often contrasting with NI contexts:
,
These illustrate that while contradictions matter, 's complainant-driven process differs from police-investigated crimes. Discrepancies are trial issues, not filing bars.
Courts may quash if:- Discrepancy proves coercion, tutorship, or external pressure. 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318- Section 164 is the sole decisive evidence and discredited.- Overall evidence fails prima facie Section 138 test.
Accused parties should seek under only with compelling grounds, not mere discrepancies.
In conclusion, complainants can file Section 138 complaints when all ingredients align, robust against minor statement hiccups. A mismatch under does not, by itself, warrant . Trial courts must examine entirety. 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318
For tailored guidance, reach out to a legal expert. Stay informed, transact wisely.
References:1. 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 318: Statements under Section 164 not substantive; discrepancies don't necessitate .2. 2010 3 Supreme 667: on non-substantive nature of Section 164.3. Other cases as cited above.
#Section138NIA, #ChequeBounce, #NILaw
However, when the statement of the complainant under Section 164-A Cr.P.C was got recorded by the police before the Judicial Magistrate Rajouri, the complainant stated that the accused never committed rape upon her and the FIR was registered by the complainant only for the reason that the petitioner ... Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has ....
There are contradictions in the complaint lodged by the complainant with the further statement made by her and also statement, which was recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. and hence, it is nothing but an abuse of process ... In the statement recorded before the learned Magistrate under 164 of #HL_START....
During investigation, the statement of complainant and other witnesses were recorded. The statement of complainant under section 164 CrPC was also recorded. ... The State of Uttrakhand and another 2020 AIR (SC) 5584, it has been submitted that no case under Section 3(1) (Da) (Dha) of SC/ST Act is made#H....
Per contra 8. , the learned ASG for the respondent-State contended that a prima facie case has been made out and that the statements made under Section 164 CrPC are sufficient to constitute offences levelled against the appellant. ... The High Court noted that the alleged relationship between the parties was not the outcome of consent on the part of th....
We have perused the statement of the complainant recorded under Section 164 CrPC before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur. 18. ... Section 376/34 of the IPC deserve to be set aside. ... There is major contradiction in her statement under Section 161 of the CrPC and unde....
Insofar as the argument regarding discrepancies in the allegations in the FIR and complainant‟s statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. is concerned, this Court is of the view that discrepancies between the FIR and a statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. cannot become the basis of discharge ... Third, he contends tha....
... ... Findings of Court: ... The court found that the petitioner had the right to access her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C ... , 1973 - Sections 164, 173, 207, and 208 - Right to access statement - Petitioner sought a copy of her statement recorded under Section ... 164 after the final report was filed, which was denied based on a Supreme Court judgment - Court held that the petitioner is entitled ... Ext.P1 Order....
Side) furnished a copy of the statement recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore under Section 164(5) Cr.P.C., wherein the said Ilango is alleged to have given a contradictory statement under Section 164(5) Cr.P.C to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate that he was introduced to G.Bhuvarahan ... Side) a....
However, strangely in the present case, the complainant herein was not produced before the Magistrate for the purpose of recording of her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. nor was her statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. by the I.O. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that ....
She has supported her version in her statement under section 164 CrPC. ... of complainant under Section 164 CrPC and for further investigation. ... In view of allegations made in the first information report, statement of informant under section 164 CrPC....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
