Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The section emphasizes that without an express contract, the agent’s interest in the subject matter prevents unilateral termination to protect the agent's interest ["Bhoom Raj VS State Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh"], ["Sudhakar.R vs The District Registrar - Madras"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["K. A. Meeran Mohideen VS Sheik Amjad - Current Civil Cases"]- ["Brinda VS Selvam - Madras"]- ["Lakshmi W/o. Muthuswami T.C. Vs S.bindhu W/o. Harikumar - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 441"]- ["North Roof Ventures Private Limited vs State of Karnataka - Karnataka"]- ["K. A. Meeran Mohideen VS Sheik Amjad - Madras"]- ["G. Vibby VS Cresco Housing Projects - Telangana"]- ["LAKSHMI vs S.BINDHU - Kerala"]- ["Sudhakar.R vs The District Registrar - Madras"]- ["Sudhakar.R Vs The District Registrar - Madras"]- ["SOUTHERN ROADWAYS LTD., MADURAI, BYITS SECRETARY. vs S.M. KRISHNAN - Supreme Court"]
In the realm of business and legal relationships, agency agreements form the backbone of many transactions. But what happens when the principal wants to terminate the agency, and the agent has a stake in the deal? A frequent legal question arises: Indian Contract Act 1872 Sec 202 termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject matter. This provision protects agents with personal interests, making such agencies generally irrevocable without explicit agreement otherwise. This blog delves into the nuances, backed by statutory text, judicial insights, and practical guidance.
Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (ICA), states: Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest.Smt. Parkash Devi VS Rajinder Kumar - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 855NAGAR 9USHEELA NAYAK VS HEADQUARTERS SUB-REGISTRAR, TURAKUR - 1979 Supreme(Kar) 8
This means that if the agent holds an actual or deemed interest—such as proprietary rights, security interests like liens, or benefits secured for valuable consideration—the principal cannot revoke the agency in a way that harms the agent's stake. The protection is robust, extending even against events like the principal's death or insolvency. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019)
Key points include:- Broad Interpretation of 'Interest': Covers proprietary, security, or consideration-based interests. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019)- Irrevocability Default: No termination without an express contract to the contrary. Smt. Parkash Devi VS Rajinder Kumar - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 855- Survival Beyond Principal's Capacity: Agency persists despite principal's death, insanity, or insolvency. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019)Om Parkash (Now Deceased) Thr LRs VS Neha Makkar - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 928
Without this interest, agencies remain revocable under general rules like Section 201, subject to notice. Lakshmi W/o. Muthuswami T.C. Vs S.bindhu W/o. Harikumar - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 441
Courts have consistently upheld Section 202's protective scope, applying it across property deals, loans, and arbitrations.
In Loonkaran v. State Bank, Jaipur, the Supreme Court ruled that authority given to secure the agent's interest cannot be revoked. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019)
A Karnataka High Court case involving a power of attorney (PoA) for a Canara Bank loan emphasized irrevocability when executed for consideration, attracting specific stamp duty under Entry 41(e) of the Karnataka Stamp Act. The court noted: The irrevocable nature and consideration for the execution of the power of attorney determined its stamp duty applicability.NAGAR 9USHEELA NAYAK VS HEADQUARTERS SUB-REGISTRAR, TURAKUR - 1979 Supreme(Kar) 8
In arbitration proceedings post-contractor P. Seshareddy's death, the court restored proceedings to the assignee, holding: The appellant had an interest in the contract and was entitled to continue with the arbitration proceedings as per Section 202. The Single Judge's oversight of Section 202 was corrected. P. Seshareddy (D) Rep. By His Lr. Cum Irrevocable Gpa Holder And Assignee Kotamreddy Kodandarami VS State of Karnataka - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1887
Another instance involved a suit challenging a sale deed. The court dismissed claims of agency lapse post-principal's death, relying on Section 202: It has been specified in Section 202... that the agency where the agent has an interest in the subject matter cannot be terminated either by insanity or at the death of the principal.Om Parkash (Now Deceased) Thr LRs VS Neha Makkar - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 928
In a property dispute, a GPA holder's directorship in the buyer company invoked Section 202, barring personal claims without prejudice to interest. P. S. Parthasarathy VS State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad - 2019 Supreme(Telangana) 133
A Delhi High Court appeal affirmed an irrevocable GPA in a property sale: In the absence of an express contract permitting termination of the agency, section 202... barred such termination. The PoA, given for consideration and declaring irrevocability, protected subsequent buyers under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Hardip Kaur VS Kailash - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1490
These cases illustrate Section 202's application in PoAs, sales, and contracts, where agent's interest (e.g., via family ties or financial stake) prevents revocation. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019)
The 'interest' under Section 202 is not narrowly defined:- Proprietary Interest: Ownership or share in the subject matter.- Security Interest: Liens, charges, or mortgages secured by the agency.- Deemed or Coupled Interest: Arising from valuable consideration or deed, as in Bowstead on Agency principles. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019)
For instance, a PoA to sell property after receiving full consideration creates such an interest, making it irrevocable. Hardip Kaur VS Kailash - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1490
While powerful, Section 202 has boundaries:- Express Contract: Parties can agree to revocability upfront. Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel - 2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 972- No Interest Present: Pure agency without stake follows revocable norms. Smt. Parkash Devi VS Rajinder Kumar - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 855- Prejudice Test: Termination must not harm the specific interest; otherwise, it's void.
Even irrevocable agencies require agents to act in good faith, per general ICA duties.
This provision is vital in real estate (irrevocable PoAs for sales), financing (loan securities), and business transfers.
Recommendations for Principals:- Explicitly state revocability in agreements if agent acquires interest.- Document interest nature to avoid disputes.
For Agents:- Ensure PoAs note 'irrevocable' and consideration to invoke Section 202.- Retain evidence of interest (e.g., payments, deeds).
In drafting, clarity prevents litigation, as seen in cases where vague terms led to appeals. P. Seshareddy (D) Rep. By His Lr. Cum Irrevocable Gpa Holder And Assignee Kotamreddy Kodandarami VS State of Karnataka - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1887
This overview provides general insights into Section 202 of the ICA, 1872. Legal outcomes depend on specific facts, contracts, and jurisdictions. Consult a qualified lawyer for advice tailored to your situation—this is not legal advice.
References:- Smt. Parkash Devi VS Rajinder Kumar - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 855: Core explanation of Section 202.- Akbarbhai Kesarbhai Sipai VS Mohanbhai Ambabhai Patel Since Decd. thro his Heirs - Current Civil Cases (2019): Scope, cases like Loonkaran, irrevocability details.- NAGAR 9USHEELA NAYAK VS HEADQUARTERS SUB-REGISTRAR, TURAKUR - 1979 Supreme(Kar) 8, P. Seshareddy (D) Rep. By His Lr. Cum Irrevocable Gpa Holder And Assignee Kotamreddy Kodandarami VS State of Karnataka - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1887, Om Parkash (Now Deceased) Thr LRs VS Neha Makkar - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 928, P. S. Parthasarathy VS State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad - 2019 Supreme(Telangana) 133, Hardip Kaur VS Kailash - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1490: Supporting case analyses.
#Section202ICA #AgencyLaw #ContractActIndia
There is also one another aspect which we must advert to, that is, Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which reads as follows: “202. Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter. ... Where the agent has got an interest in the subject matter of the contract#HL_END....
Section 202 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872 is extracted hereunder for ready reference:- “Termination of Agency where agent has an interest in subject matter:- Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of ... of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872 ....
202.Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter. ... Section 202 says that where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest. ....
202.Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter. ... Revocation of authority is dealt with in Sections 201 to 208 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 . The relevant provisions in the Contract Act are extracted hereunder:- “201. Termination of agency. ... Section 202 says that where the....
Section 202 of the Contract Act, along with two illustrations, are extracted hereunder:- "202.Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter. ... Section 201 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Contract Act') provides for termination of #HL....
There is also one another aspect which we must advert to, that is, Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which reads as follows: ''202. Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter. ... Where the agent has got an interest in the subject matter of the contract....
Termination of agency where agent has an interest in subject matter - Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject matter of the agency, the agency, cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest. Illustrations. ... S. 202 of the India....
Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter-where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest.' ... However, learned Single Judge could not have read Section 201 o....
Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, reads as follows “Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject matter:- Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express #HL_STAR....
It has been specified in Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 that the agency where the agent has an interest in the subject matter cannot be terminated either by insanity or at the death of the principal. ... While relying upon Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 learned counsel for the appellant submits that....
“Section 202:- Termination of agency where agent has an interest in subject matter.- Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest.” I shall first deal with the first submission as regards section 202 of the Contact Act. Section 202 of the Contract Act reads thus:—
However, the facts brought on record indicate that the agreement of sale was admittedly executed by the principals in favour of M/s.Trinity Infraventures Limited, a corporate body, and P.S.Parthasarathy, the GPA holder, was only a Director therein. In terms of Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, where an agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest. Therefore, in his personal capacity, the GPA holder cannot claim ....
In the absence of an express contract permitting termination of the agency, section 202 of he Contract Act barred such termination. The power of attorney executed by the plaintiff in favour of Sardar Saran Singh expressly stated that it could not be revoked by the plaintiff. Since Sardar Saran Singh is the father of defendant No.2, he is, therefore, interested in the subject-matter of agency, namely, the plot number B-1/16, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. Section 202 of the Contract Act interdicts termination of agency where an agent has an interest in the subject-matter of the agency.#HL....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
