Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Site Exhibition and Reporting Requirements - The sources emphasize that reports submitted to courts or authorities must be properly certified and based on reliable data. For example, ["Chamindranee Bandara Kiriella vs Justice Upaly Abeyrathne (Retd.) Chairman of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Probing Fraud and Corruption that occurred at State Institutions from 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2018 and others. - Court Of Appeal"] and ["Lakshman Bandara Kiriella vs Justice Upaly Abeyrathne (Retd.) Chairman of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Probing Fraud and Corruption that occurred at State Institutions from 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2018 and others. - Court Of Appeal"] highlight that a duly certified copy must come from an authorized source, and without proper certification, the report's authenticity is questionable. Reports must be supported by evidence and properly recorded, especially when used as evidence in legal proceedings.The phrase ‘duly certified copy’ must mean that the authority responsible for its issuance must have certified the copy submitted to Court as a copy duly obtained from the original. ["Chamindranee Bandara Kiriella vs Justice Upaly Abeyrathne (Retd.) Chairman of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Probing Fraud and Corruption that occurred at State Institutions from 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2018 and others. - Court Of Appeal"]When this matter was specifically raised during the argument, Mr... ["Lakshman Bandara Kiriella vs Justice Upaly Abeyrathne (Retd.) Chairman of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Probing Fraud and Corruption that occurred at State Institutions from 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2018 and others. - Court Of Appeal"]
Environmental and Heritage Site Reporting - Several sources, such as ["X VS State of Goa - Bombay"], stress the importance of timely and accurate reporting for protected heritage sites, including compliance and preservation reports. Authorities must file reports within specified timeframes (e.g., three months) to ensure protection of sites like potential world heritage locations. These reports should include assessments of environmental impact, conservation status, and measures taken to prevent damage, such as quarrying or development near heritage sites.The Director must file a compliance/status report within three months. ["X VS State of Goa - Bombay"]All such authorities must be extra vigilant in preventing such large-scale quarrying operations near the Site... ["X VS State of Goa - Bombay"]
Land and Property Inspection Reports - Court-ordered inspections or site reports, such as those in ["T S MALLIKARJUNA vs K SETHA MAHALAKSHMI - Karnataka"], ["KUM. JAYASHREE vs SRI K.N.JAGADEESH - Karnataka"], and ["SRI. T. G. PARAMESHWARAPPA vs SRI. BASAVARAJAPPA H. E - Karnataka"], must be detailed, accurate, and supported by certified evidence. These reports establish ownership, encroachment, or boundary issues and are critical in property disputes. Proper procedures, including appointing commissioners or engineers, are required to ensure reports are reliable and admissible.A house had been constructed in Site No.15 measuring 40 ft. x 30 ft. The western boundary of the suit property is Site No.15. ["KUM. JAYASHREE vs SRI K.N.JAGADEESH - Karnataka"]If Site No.15a is not part of the approved plan, a Commissioner must be appointed to conduct local inspection... ["SRI. T. G. PARAMESHWARAPPA vs SRI. BASAVARAJAPPA H. E - Karnataka"]
Traffic and Impact Assessment Reports - For development projects, such as the metro station or commercial complexes, impact assessment reports (e.g., ["RESIDENTS OF DELHI THROUGH SHOBHA AGARWAL VS DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS. - National Green Tribunal"], ["Residents of Delhi Through Shobha Agarwal vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Ors. - National Green Tribunal"]) conclude that traffic generated is often insignificant (e.g., only 301 PCUs during peak hours). These reports also include environmental mitigation measures like tree plantation and traffic management strategies. Proper assessment ensures projects do not adversely affect the surrounding infrastructure.During most intense peak hour, the generated traffic from the project site is only 301 PCU’s which is insignificant. ["Residents of Delhi Through Shobha Agarwal vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Ors. - National Green Tribunal"]Impact Assessment (EIA) and carrying capacity studies must be conducted by the Joint Committee. ["RESIDENTS OF DELHI THROUGH SHOBHA AGARWAL VS DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS. - National Green Tribunal"]
Legal and Procedural Compliance in Reports - Several documents, such as ["Chamindranee Bandara Kiriella vs Justice Upaly Abeyrathne (Retd.) Chairman of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Probing Fraud and Corruption that occurred at State Institutions from 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2018 and others. - Court Of Appeal"], ["Guttu and Company VS State of Assam - Gauhati"], and ["Pallorbund Tea Limited VS State of Assam - Gauhati"], underline that reports used in legal contexts must meet strict standards: proper certification, honest representation of facts, and comprehensive reasoning. Failure to meet these standards can invalidate reports or lead to legal challenges.The report is primarily tendered to Court as being a copy of the Commission Report, which contains the impugned recommendation. However, P-7 is neither the original nor a certified copy of the said Report. ["Chamindranee Bandara Kiriella vs Justice Upaly Abeyrathne (Retd.) Chairman of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Probing Fraud and Corruption that occurred at State Institutions from 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2018 and others. - Court Of Appeal"]The enquiry report must permit a peep into the mind of the Enquiry Officer and that he considered the pros and cons of the matter before arriving at a conclusion. ["IND00019026"]
Analysis and Conclusion:Across the sources, a consistent theme is that reports submitted to courts, authorities, or for public record must be properly certified, accurate, and based on thorough investigation. This ensures legal validity, environmental protection, and proper land management. Failure to adhere to certification procedures, timely filing, or factual accuracy can undermine the credibility of the report and may result in legal or procedural invalidation. Therefore, site, environmental, property, and impact assessment reports must be meticulously prepared, certified, and supported by evidence to fulfill their intended legal and administrative purposes.
In civil litigation, particularly cases involving property disputes or site inspections, the role of a often becomes pivotal. A common query arises: site comishnor report must be exibeted – or more precisely, must the be formally ? This question touches on fundamental evidentiary principles under the , especially .
While courts generally treat such reports as , formal exhibition and examination of the commissioner can significantly impact their weight. This blog post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from judicial precedents and practical implications to guide litigants and legal professionals. Note: This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
The site commissioner’s report must typically be exhibited as part of the evidence when relied upon by the court to determine facts, aligning with established principles. However, it forms automatically and can be considered even without formal marking, provided the court exercises caution on its reliability.
Key judicial stance: The report of the commissioner is considered evidence and forms .
These points underscore a balanced approach: procedural rigor enhances admissibility without making it absolute.
Appointed under for , the commissioner's report – including recorded evidence – integrates into the suit record. Courts can rely on it for fact-finding. The legal position... is that the report of a commissioner appointed under is and constitutes evidence in the suit.
This inclusion persists even in complex cases, akin to environmental disputes where site inspection reports by committees like the are scrutinized. For instance, in a forest conservation matter, the CEC's site report was central, with courts directing further inquiries to validate findings.
While the report stands alone initially, its amplifies with the commissioner's testimony. Parties or courts may summon them for . If unexamined, courts must independently gauge credibility. The court or any party may examine the commissioner personally to clarify issues or to test the reliability of the report.
Failure here doesn't invalidate but weakens it, mirroring scenarios in regulatory approvals where reports required site verification. This report must be taken as the final observation of the EVC which is based on inspection of the site.
Formal marking isn't strictly required. Even if the report is not , it remains and can be considered evidence.
However, best practice favors exhibition, especially if material. In electricity theft cases, inspection reports needed proper procedure for assessments, highlighting procedural lapses' impact. Inspection report no where shows that procedure laid down... was followed.
Indian courts have consistently clarified this:
In broader contexts, like land acquisition challenges, courts demand site-specific reports' compliance. The final EIA Report, which must be after inspection of the site, has not been submitted.
When objections arise, examination is prudent: The court has the discretion to consider the report, but when substantial objections are raised, examining the commissioner is advisable.
Relatedly, in recruitment disputes, commissions' reports faced scrutiny for procedural adherence, reinforcing that unexamined reports invite caution.
For litigants:
Defamation cases illustrate reportage defenses where reports' neutral presentation matters, not truth verification – paralleling commissioner reports' contextual reliance.
In practice, like CCTV-monitored sites or fire safety reports, on-site documentation mirrors commissioner duties, emphasizing verifiable evidence.
Generally, a need not be formally exhibited to be evidence, as it forms under CPC. However, for robust reliance – especially in fact-determination – exhibition and commissioner examination are advisable. This balances efficiency with fairness, as precedents like and affirm.
Key Takeaways:- Report is evidence by default; marking optional but beneficial.- Examine commissioner for contested matters.- Courts assess credibility independently.
Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence. For tailored advice, engage legal experts. References: , .
#CommissionerReport, #CPCLaw, #LegalEvidence
The report, taken as a whole, must have the effect that the defamatory material is attributed to the parties in the dispute. The report must not be seen as being put forward to establish the truth of any of the defamatory assertions. ... To qualify as reportage the report, judging the thrust of it as a whole, must have the effect of reporting, not the truth of the statements, but the fact that they were made. ... ... Therefore, the Ministry of Education under PW-1 considered a proposal....
A compliance report must be filed within three months. ... Therefore, the Director's status report must advert this aspect of the survey and findings. ... protected heritage site and file the report in this Court within three months. ... Finally, as noted earlier, the State must take all steps necessary to protect, preserve and maintain these pre-historic sites. The Director must file a compliance/status report within three months. ....
Therefore, the clauses must be construed to refer to the inspection of the iron ore for Fe content at the mining site and not at the loading port. ... [13] In essence, the defendant's argument is that the Contract was based on an Ex-Seller mining site basis; the price adjustment for Fe content must be based on an inspection done at the mining site. ... As such, there must be a price adjustment for Fe content. [17] Learned counsel also argued that the defendant's conduct clearly show....
This report would indicate that the appellant indeed owns and is in possession of site No. ... , must be tested after the Court Commissioner is cross-examined. ... and such report is also placed on record. ... The owner of the site No.75 has not encroached any portion. ... The civil Court, allowing the respondents9 application for temporary injunction, has restrained the appellant from proceeding with the construction in the site bearing Site No. 77.
Installation of CCTV cameras at the site must be ensured.Leachate and water is being sprayed by using the Pump,. Spray Guns. CCTV cameras already installed and operational at site.5. ... Fire protection measure and safety equipment must be provided to all workers at site.The following fire measure are bein taken at SLF site: i. Identification of the Hot Spots b using portable Infrared Temperatur detectors. ii. ... CPCB guidelines dated 26.05.2022Remarks1Fresh waste, organic waste, Indu....
It must be borne in mind that there are two requirements in the above phrase. The first is that the relevant copy must be certified and the second is that the said certification must be duly done. ... The phrase ‘duly certified copy’ must mean that the authority responsible for its issuance must have certified the copy submitted to Court as a copy duly obtained from the original. It is only then that a Court of Law can rely and act on such document.” [emphasis added.] ... Samarasekere 49 NLR 285, in w....
It must be borne in mind that there are two requirements in the above phrase. The first is that the relevant copy must be certified and the second is that the said certification must be duly done. ... The phrase ‘duly certified copy’ must mean that the authority responsible for its issuance must have certified the copy submitted to Court as a copy duly obtained from the original. It is only then that a Court of Law can rely and act on such document.” [emphasis added.] ... Samarasekere 49 NLR 285, in w....
As can be noticed from Section 24 of the Re-Assessment Act, a rate report must be prepared to consider revision of land revenue through Section 11A. What the rate report must contain are specified under the Re-Assessment Rules. ... On the issue of declaration of the tea factory land as Industrial Site through the impugned notification, the provision of Section 3A of the Re-Assessment Act must be taken into account. ... Site is contrary to law. ... declare such area as....
As can be noticed from Section 24 of the Re-Assessment Act, a rate report must be prepared to consider revision of land revenue through Section 11A. What the rate report must contain are specified under the Re-Assessment Rules. ... On the issue of declaration of the tea factory land as Industrial Site through the impugned notification, the provision of Section 3A of the Re-Assessment Act must be taken into account. ... such area as trade site, commercial sit....
As per this report, during most intense peak hour, the generated traffic from the project site is only 301 PCU’s which is insignificant. ... Impact Assessment (EIA) and carrying capacity studies must be conducted by the Joint Committee. ... During the site visit, DMRC presented report on Traffic Impact Assessment study for the proposed commercial development on the U/G metro station at BhikajiCama Place. This study was carried out by TPA Engineering Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Annexure-B). 5. ... That as....
We are told that the C.E.C. is proposing to inspect the site and shall give a report. It is alleged that the C.E.C. has prevented the applicant from constructing some parking area near the bus stand. We think that before giving any direction to the applicant, the C.E.C. may hear the applicant and file a report and meanwhile the work relating to the construction of bus stand may continue but no other construction shall be carried out." The construction of the Bus Stand Complex was then completed by the second respondent on 7 July 2008.
This report must be taken as the final observation of the EVC which is based on inspection of the site. In other words, some noting made in the previous report submitted by EVC and SAC-SC would be of no avail to the petitioners. The common EVC then inspected the site in the presence of the representative of the petitioner No.1-society and submitted its report dated 1st July, 2017 mentioning about the two deficiencies noticed during the said inspection namely, another institute of the petitioner No.1-society in the name of AIM was proposed to be run on the same land on which....
As this matter is being heard on day to day basis, this web hosting should be done within 24 hours and any objection to the said report should be filed before this Court by next date of hearing after serving a copy on the opposite side within three days. On such web hosting, all such persons who are aggrieved by the contents of the same are at liberty to file objections, appear before this Court personally or through their counsel and bring it to the notice of the Court their say in the matter so that the Court would be in a better position to appreciate the arguments of all persons concerne....
The final EIA Report, which must be after inspection of the site, has not been submitted and hence EIA report does not comply with the stipulated norms and is accordingly flawed.
In case of HT connection, the supply may be disconnected if there is a prima facie evidence of theft as recorded by photographs/MRI reports for TVMmeters, or where removal of evidence by consumer is apprehended. The report shall be prepared at site as per sub clause (iii) above. In cases where the theft of electricity is detected by by-passing the meter or metering equipment and the electrical load, fully or partially, of the person’s connection is found connected directly with the lines, cables or electrical plant, electric supply to such premises shall be disconnected for....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
