Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Stop Proceedings under Section 255 Cr.P.C. - Section 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) provides the magistrate with the authority to record an acquittal or conviction after hearing the evidence. An acquittal under this section occurs only after the evidence is taken and the accused is found not guilty. It is applicable in cases where proceedings are terminated after the magistrate's evaluation of evidence, often following a trial or hearing Arun Gupta VS J. P. Meena - Punjab and Haryana, S. M. Arul Nandi Sivam VS K. C. Soundarapandiyan - Madras.
Power to Discontinue Proceedings - Sections 256, 257, and 258 Cr.P.C. empower magistrates to stop proceedings in certain circumstances, such as when the complaint is withdrawn or when the complainant is absent, leading to acquittal or discontinuance Arun Gupta VS J. P. Meena - Punjab and Haryana.
Procedural Aspects of Acquittal and Discontinuance - An acquittal under Section 255 can be recorded in summons cases, especially when proceedings are discontinued or the case is dismissed after hearing. The courts have clarified that such an acquittal signifies the end of proceedings where the evidence does not support conviction Arun Gupta VS J. P. Meena - Punjab and Haryana, S. M. Arul Nandi Sivam VS K. C. Soundarapandiyan - Madras.
Misapplication or Mistaken Use of Sections - Some judgments indicate that courts sometimes incorrectly quote or apply other provisions (e.g., Sections 389, 397, or 138 of N.I. Act) instead of Section 255 Cr.P.C. for acquittal or termination of proceedings. Proper application of Section 255 is crucial for valid acquittal, which should follow after hearing and assessing evidence S. M. Arul Nandi Sivam VS K. C. Soundarapandiyan - Madras, SRI SAMPATHRAJ vs SMT VRINDA SHETTY - Karnataka.
Implications of Proceedings under Section 255 - An order of acquittal under Section 255 is a judgment that terminates criminal proceedings after evaluating evidence. It is not merely a procedural dismissal but a substantive judgment of innocence or non-culpability SRI SAMPATHRAJ vs SMT VRINDA SHETTY - Karnataka, Cecilia Reynold D’souza VS Ruby Cyril D’souza - Bombay.
Legal Challenges and Appeals - Orders of acquittal under Section 255 can be challenged if not properly supported by evidence or if procedural safeguards, such as giving an opportunity to adduce evidence, are not followed. Courts have emphasized the importance of following proper procedures to ensure the validity of acquittal orders DR.PREMSANKAR vs THE STATE OF KERALA - Kerala.
Stopping proceedings under Section 255 Cr.P.C. involves a judicial decision to acquit the accused after hearing evidence. It is a substantive order that signifies the conclusion of the case in favor of the accused, based on the court's assessment. Proper application requires that the court has taken evidence and heard the parties, and that the order is supported by the record. Misapplication or incorrect quoting of other sections can lead to appellate challenges. Courts have consistently held that an order under Section 255 is a final judgment of acquittal, terminating the proceedings, and must adhere to procedural safeguards to be valid.
References:- Sections 255, 256, 257, 258, 259 Cr.P.C.- Case laws and judicial interpretations from sources such as SCC Online and various judgments cited above.
In the realm of Indian criminal law, navigating the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) can be complex, especially in summons cases. One common query that arises is: Stop the Proceedings under Section 255 Crpc. Accused individuals or complainants often seek clarity on whether ongoing proceedings can be halted after a discharge or acquittal order. This blog post delves into the legal principles, procedures, and limitations surrounding Section 255 CrPC, drawing from judicial precedents and statutory interpretations to provide a comprehensive overview.
Whether you're facing a summons case or advising on one, understanding these nuances is crucial. We'll examine if and how proceedings can be stopped, the nature of discharge orders, and the proper legal remedies available.
Section 255 of the CrPC governs the procedure in summons cases after the evidence is taken. It empowers the Magistrate to either acquit the accused if they are found not guilty or convict them under subsections (1) and (2), respectively. This section applies post-hearing, marking a critical stage where the court evaluates the evidence presented.
As outlined in key legal documents, Under Section 255(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if the Magistrate, upon taking the evidence... finds the accused not guilty, he shall record an order of acquittal. Kumar VS Perumal and Others - 1996 0 Supreme(Mad) 559. This underscores that an order under Section 255 is substantive, based on merits after evidence review, not a preliminary dismissal.
Related sections like 251 to 259 form the framework for summons-case trials. For instance, Ranjit Sarkar VS Ravi Ganesh Bhardwaj - 2025 4 Supreme 375 - 2025 4 Supreme 375 notes: It has 8 (eight) sections from Section 251 to 259. Section 254 lays down the procedure to be followed if conviction is not recorded in terms of Sections 252 and 253. An acquittal can be recorded by a magistrate under Section 255, Cr....
The short answer, based on established legal principles, is no—proceedings under Section 255 CrPC cannot be stopped solely based on a discharge order without valid legal grounds. A discharge under Section 255(1) is a final judgment on the merits, determined after evaluating evidence. It concludes whether sufficient grounds exist for proceeding to trial.
Key points from judicial analysis include:- Discharge as a Substantive Order: The Court can discharge only when there is no sufficient ground for proceeding or the charge was found to be groundless. K. Dhanabakkiyam VS Thirumala Wall Decors & Suncontrols - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 420Union Of India VS Mohd. Abdul Hafeez - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1839. This is not an arbitrary halt but a reasoned decision.- No Automatic Stay: The order does not inherently authorize stopping or suspending proceedings unless challenged properly. Courts have clarified that proceedings can only be halted if the discharge is legally invalid or if the grounds for discharge are satisfied. Kumar VS Perumal and Others - 1996 0 Supreme(Mad) 559.- Finality of the Order: Discharge terminates the case at that stage if no grounds for trial exist, but it is appealable. Unilateral stops without procedure are not supported. Union Of India VS Mohd. Abdul Hafeez - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1839.
In practice, misapplications occur, such as confusing Section 255 with others like Section 258 (power to stop in certain cases). Raj Kishor Singh, Son of Sri Chitranjan Singh VS State of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna - 2019 Supreme(Pat) 737 - 2019 0 Supreme(Pat) 737 states: Section 258 of the Cr.P.C deals with the powers to stop proceedings in certain cases. However, Section 255 focuses on post-evidence acquittal, not discretionary stops.
Discharge or acquittal under Section 255(1) requires the Magistrate to consider the police report, documents, and evidence. If, upon consideration of the police report and the documents, the Magistrate considers the charge to be groundless, he shall discharge the accused, and record his reasons for so doing. Kumar VS Perumal and Others - 1996 0 Supreme(Mad) 559.
This is distinct from earlier stages. For example, BABUSAB S/O MAHABOOBSAB BISARALLI vs UDAYKUMAR S/O BHIMASEN RAO MUTAGI - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4635 - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4635 discusses acquittal under Section 255(1) in a Negotiable Instruments Act case: by exercising the powers under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C acquitted the accused.
The power is exercised only if no sufficient grounds exist. K. Dhanabakkiyam VS Thirumala Wall Decors & Suncontrols - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 420 emphasizes evaluation at that stage alone. Arbitrary halts are impermissible; the court assesses evidence without preempting trial unless grounds are absent.
Other sources highlight related powers:- Sections 256-258: Allow stops for complainant absence or withdrawal, leading to acquittal or discontinuance. Arun Gupta VS J. P. Meena - Punjab and Haryana.- Not Merely Procedural: Acquittal under Section 255 signifies non-culpability after hearing. S. M. Arul Nandi Sivam VS K. C. Soundarapandiyan - Madras.
To halt proceedings post-discharge, invoke appellate or revisional remedies under Sections 397 or 401 CrPC. Direct orders to stop without challenge are invalid. As seen in SRI K SUBRAMANAYA S/O KARIAYAPPA Vs SRI T H APPAJI S/O SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA - Karnataka, revisions challenge convictions under Section 255(2).
Courts warn against misquoting sections; proper application ensures validity. S. M. Arul Nandi Sivam VS K. C. Soundarapandiyan - MadrasSRI SAMPATHRAJ vs SMT VRINDA SHETTY - Karnataka. If procedural irregularities exist, appeals may quash or stay, but not automatically. DR.PREMSANKAR vs THE STATE OF KERALA - Kerala.
Section 255 operates within summons-case trials (Sections 251-259). For instance, Ragesh Keisham VS Sovelia Akoijam - 2019 Supreme(Manipur) 34 - 2019 0 Supreme(Manipur) 34 notes: Therefore, there is no ground for invoking Section 258 CrPC and to stop the proceeding. This reinforces that stops require specific grounds, not general discharge pleas.
In maintenance cases, proceedings under Section 125 CrPC are civil-tinged but distinct. Zaheeda W/o Rajmohammed Chouse VS Rajmohammed S/o Gulabsab Chouse - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 892 - 2018 0 Supreme(Kar) 892 clarifies their nature, avoiding conflation with Section 255.
Judgments like Tariq Mehmood Bhat VS Zubaida Akhtar - 2021 Supreme(J&K) 612 - 2021 0 Supreme(J&K) 612 question if certain proceedings (e.g., Section 488 CrPC, now 125) are civil, but Section 255 remains criminal post-evidence.
Recommendations:- Consult a lawyer to assess discharge validity.- File appeals under Section 378(1) if complainant, or revisions as needed. BABUSAB S/O MAHABOOBSAB BISARALLI vs UDAYKUMAR S/O BHIMASEN RAO MUTAGI - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4635 - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4635.- Ensure evidence supports any stop request.
Proceedings under Section 255 CrPC generally cannot be stopped merely on discharge grounds; they require legal challenge via proper channels. This framework upholds fairness, preventing arbitrary terminations. While Section 255 provides closure through acquittal, its finality demands rigorous evidence evaluation.
Disclaimer: This post offers general information based on legal precedents and is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for your case.
xxxxxxxxxxx Section 256 Cr.PC xxxxxxxxxxx Section 257 Cr.PC xxxxxxxxxxx Section 258 Cr.PC:- Power to stop proceedings in certain cases. ... Section 252 Cr.PC xxxxxxxxxxx Section 253 Cr.PC xxxxxxxxxxx Section 254 Cr.PC xxxxxxxxxxx Section 255 Cr.PC of the Cr.P.C.....
State, 2011 SCC Online Mad 255]. In this case, whether the petitioner had executed a bond as per section 88 of Cr.P.C. or not, is not known to this Court. 7.3. Further, the said offence is compoundable with the permission of the Court under section 320 (2) of Cr.P.C. ... In fact, Section 255 of Cr.P.C., is the correct provision for recording acquittal ....
It has 8 (eight) sections from Section 251 to 259. Section 254 lays down the procedure to be followed if conviction is not recorded in terms of Sections 252 and 253. An acquittal can be recorded by a magistrate under Section 255, Cr. ... Apart from proceedings initiated elsewhere, the appellant lodged a complaint under Section 200, Cr. ... only section which is applicab....
under Section 255 Cr.P.C . ... Act post-appearance, on the ground of non-production of property detail under Section 83 of the Cr.P.C., can be construed as an acquittal under Section 255 of the Cr.P.C., thereby rendering the revision petition under Section 397 of the Cr.P.C. not maintainable? ... Section#HL....
the proceedings under Section 138 of N.I.Act. ... The operative portion reads as under:- "Acting under Section 255(2) of Cr.P.C., the accused is convicted for the offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I.Act., and the accused is This Criminal Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. ....
Issues: Whether the court below acted correctly by dismissing the complaint and acquitting the accused under Section 255(1 ... Ratio Decidendi: The acquittal under Section 255(1) was determined to be inappropriate, as the court failed to consider the ... It is pertinent to note that the accused were acquitted under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C. The acquittal under #HL_STA....
But, Section 255 of the Succession Act does not use the words “and the Law”. The only words used in Section 255 of the Succession Act are “whenever the nature of the case requires.” 21. ... 67 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 constituting an exception to such grant under Section 255 of the said Act? ... Rajendra Pai, learned senior counsel appearing for the defendants submitted that in....
But, Section 255 of the Succession Act does not use the words “and the Law”. The only words used in Section 255 of the Succession Act are “whenever the nature of the case requires.” 21. ... 67 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 constituting an exception to such grant under Section 255 of the said Act? ... The second part of the said provision would not come within the exception contempla....
397 AND 401 CR.P.C. ... The judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial court is as under: “Under Section 255(2) of Cr.P.C. the accused is found guilty and convicted for the offences punishable u/ss 279 and ... 255(1) OF Cr.P.C. the accused is acquitted of the offence punishable U/s 337 of IPC. ... The learned trial judge has not sentenced....
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and by exercising the powers under Section 255(1) of Cr.P.C acquitted the accused. ... This appeal is filed by the appellant-complainant under Section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short, hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) ... The complainant lodged a private complaint under Section 200 of #HL_STAR....
“i. Whether the proceedings under section 488 CrPC are entirely civil proceedings? 5. The petitioner has raised the following questions in the present petition:-
Therefore, there is no ground for invoking Section 258 CrPC and to stop the proceeding. There is no necessity for this Court to cut short the trial.
19. Section 258 of the Cr.P.C deals with the powers to stop proceedings in certain cases.
In Iqbal Banu’s case referred to supra the Hon’ble Supreme Court relying on its earlier judgment in Vijaykumar Prasad’s case held as follows : “10. Proceedings under Section 125 CrPC and claims made under the Act are tried by the same court. Proceedings under Section 125 CrPC are civil in nature. Even if the Court noticed that there was a divorced woman in the case in question, it was open to it to treat it as a petition under the Act considering the beneficial nature of the ....
In any event, it is evident that it was not a petition under Section 320 Cr.P.C. Where the trial court considered that the case against the accused 2 and 3 alone was acquitted and the case against the present petitioner-accused No.1 was pending adjudication, the trial court perhaps was justified in dismissing the petition. A revision assailing such an order is also worthy to be dismissed. More or less, the request to stop proceedings was sought for through orders in Crl.M.P.No.2250 o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
