SupremeToday Landscape Ad
AI Thinking

AI Thinking...

Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!

Scanned Judgements…!

Checking relevance for Ram Kumar Agarwal VS Thawar Das...

Checking relevance for Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. VS Katta Sujatha Reddy...

Checking relevance for Manickam @ Thandapani VS Vasantha...

Checking relevance for Rohit Kochhar VS Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd. ...

Checking relevance for Desh Raj VS Rohtash Singh...

Checking relevance for V. L. Dhandapani VS Revathy Ramachandran...

Checking relevance for Parappalliyil Dasan VS K. K. Sasi...

Checking relevance for B. V. Basavaraj Since deceased Rep. by his LRs. Smt. Sujaya Basavaraj VS K. L. Kumaraswamy S/o Lakshminarayana Shetty...

Checking relevance for Padmaja VS Erattil Sajeev...

Checking relevance for Ramesh Gaikwad VS N. S. Prakasham...

Checking relevance for Rawal Chand VS Gopal...

Checking relevance for Sarverunnisa Begum VS Syed Rafeeq...

Checking relevance for Vinod Seth VS Devinder Bajaj...

Checking relevance for UNION OF INDIA VS IBRAHIM UDDIN...

Checking relevance for A. NAWAB JOHN VS V. N. SUBRAMANIYAM...

Checking relevance for BISWANATH GHOSH AND OTHERS (Dead) VS GOBINDA GHOSH ALIAS GOBINDHA CHANDRA GHOSH...

Checking relevance for Thomson Press (India) Ltd. VS Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. ...

Checking relevance for PADMAKUMARI VS DASAYYAN...


AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Request for List of Judgements in Supreme Today Database - The user seeks a comprehensive list of all judgments available in the Supreme Today database compiled into a single PDF. No direct reference found in provided sources explicitly confirming the existence or provision of such a list in a PDF format.

  • Judgments and Data Compilation in Court Proceedings - Several documents mention the collection, retrieval, and submission of judgments and data in court-related cases. For example, ["DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS INDIA Vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX,SPECIAL RANGE - 3, - Delhi"] indicates a court granting time for filing revised submissions along with a compilation of judgments, referring to specific PDF page numbers of digital records. Similarly, ["MOHD ABDUL REHMAN vs STATE NCT OF DELHI - Delhi"] discusses data retrieved from mobile phones and the transfer of data to pen drives, with references to PDF pages in court records. These references suggest that judgments are stored digitally and may be compiled, but do not specify a complete list or a single PDF containing all judgments.

  • Judgments Related to Data and Digital Records - Multiple entries, such as ["NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi"], ["NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi"]-282_2020), and ["NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi"], mention orders to submit lists of infringing channels, compliance reports, and data related to judgments, often in searchable PDF or OCR-supported PDF format. They also reference judgments of the Supreme Court, such as in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. and Godavarman Thirumulpad v., indicating that judgments are stored and referenced digitally but not necessarily consolidated into a single PDF. These references highlight that judgments are maintained in digital formats for court proceedings but do not confirm a consolidated list in one PDF.

  • Specific Court Orders for Data Submission - Courts have ordered parties to submit data, reports, and compliance status in searchable PDF formats, e.g., ["MUKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL VS CPCB & ORS. - National Green Tribunal"], ["ALL INDIA YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST - National Green Tribunal"], and ["Om Pal & Ors. vs State of U.P - National Green Tribunal"]. These documents involve data related to environmental cases, infringing channels, and compliance reports, often referencing judgments but not providing a compiled judgment list.

  • No Evidence of a Single PDF List of All Judgments - None of the sources explicitly state that a comprehensive, consolidated list of all judgments from the Supreme Today database exists in one PDF. Instead, judgments are referenced individually within court orders, case files, or data submissions, often in digital PDF formats for specific cases or compliance reports.

Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the provided sources, there is no direct confirmation that a complete list of all judgments in the Supreme Today database is compiled into a single PDF document. Judgments are stored digitally and referenced in various court orders, but they are not collectively provided as one PDF file. To obtain such a list, one might need to access the Supreme Today platform directly or request a compilation from the relevant court or database administrator.

References:- ["DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS INDIA Vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX,SPECIAL RANGE - 3, - Delhi"]- ["MOHD ABDUL REHMAN vs STATE NCT OF DELHI - Delhi"]- ["NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi"]- ["NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi"]-282_2020)- ["NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi"]- ["MUKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL VS CPCB & ORS. - National Green Tribunal"]- ["ALL INDIA YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST - National Green Tribunal"]- ["Om Pal & Ors. vs State of U.P - National Green Tribunal"]

Supreme Court Judgments: Compiling the Full List from Supreme Today Database into One PDF

In the digital age of legal research, professionals, students, and litigants often seek efficient ways to access and organize Supreme Court judgments. A common query arises: List of all Judgements in Data Base of Supreme Today in One Pdf. This question highlights the need for consolidated resources amid vast legal databases. While no single official PDF contains all judgments from platforms like Supreme Today, curated lists from referenced cases can be compiled for quick reference. This post explores a key selection of Supreme Court rulings, their citations, and practical tips for creating your own PDF compilation, drawing from reliable sources. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice; consult a qualified attorney for case-specific guidance.

Understanding Supreme Today and Judgment Databases

Supreme Today is a popular legal database aggregating judgments from Indian courts, including the Supreme Court. Users frequently request downloadable PDFs of judgment lists for offline study or case preparation. However, databases typically provide individual judgment PDFs rather than a universal all judgments file due to volume—millions of documents exist across systems like DORIS (Document Registration Information System). Monk Estates Private Limited VS Government of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2982

Till date how much data is being stored in DORIS Nos. of documents in central data base: 5138219 Monk Estates Private Limited VS Government of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2982. This underscores the scale of digital legal repositories, emphasizing the value of targeted lists.

Compiling judgments into one PDF promotes accessibility, especially for thematic research in employment, banking, or administrative law, as seen in the cases below.

Curated List of Key Supreme Court Judgments

Based on referenced legal documents, here is a compiled list of prominent Supreme Court judgments. These cases often address employment disputes, departmental proceedings, and service matters, reflecting consistent judicial views. Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL

  1. General Manager (D & PB) and Ors vs. Kunti Tiwary & Anr.
  2. Punjab National Bank & Ors. vs. Ashwini Kumar Taneja - Citation: (2004) 7 SCC 265 Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL
  3. Union Bank of India & Ors. vs. M.T. Latheesh - Citation: (2006) 7 SCC 350 Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL
  4. Santosh Kumar Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. - Citation: (2009) 6 SCC 481 Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL
  5. Union of India & Ors. vs. Sheela Rani Soam - Citation: (2008) 1 CHN 264 Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL
  6. Maisur Khan vs. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. & Ors. - Citation: 2009(2) CLJ (Cal) 101 Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL

The judgments cited reflect a consistent view of the Supreme Court on the matters at hand, as highlighted by the learned advocate for the respondents. Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL. Each contributes to precedents in labor and service law, such as termination of temporary employees or data preservation duties.

How to Compile These into One PDF

  • Step 1: Download individual judgments from Supreme Today or SCC Online using the citations.
  • Step 2: Use tools like Adobe Acrobat or free PDF mergers (e.g., SmallPDF, ILovePDF) to combine files.
  • Step 3: Add a cover page with the list, citations, and source notes for professionalism.
  • Recommendation: Compile the above judgments into a single PDF document for easy reference and distribution. Ensure that each citation is accurately formatted. Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL

This approach mirrors court directives on record preservation, as in land registration cases where missing volumes prompted reconstruction via digital systems. GRAM SUDHAR SABHA (REGD.) Vs NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR. - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11837

Key Legal Principles from These Judgments

These rulings establish precedents on procedural fairness in service matters:- Consistent Supreme Court stance on departmental inquiries and employee rights.- Emphasis on evidence preservation, relevant to modern databases. Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Relatedly, courts stress digital integrity. In data entry operator terminations, duties include collect, prepare, summarize and preserve the data... did not preserve the data in his computer, did not made PDF files. Tarun Kumar VS State of Jharkhand - 2020 Supreme(Jhk) 806Nayan Goswami VS State of Jharkhand - 2020 Supreme(Jhk) 436. Failure leads to service issues under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Insights from Other Legal Sources on Digital Judgment Access

Indian courts increasingly mandate searchable PDFs for transparency. For instance:- DORIS System Implementation: The documents after registration are scanned and being stored as scanned image stored in Data Base... DORIS Computer application was launched in 2002. Courts direct full rollout for land records preservation, addressing missing files from 2005. Monk Estates Private Limited VS Government of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2982GRAM SUDHAR SABHA (REGD.) Vs NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR. - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11837. - Ratio: The court emphasized the importance of proper preservation and storage of land records... responsibility of the GNCTD in ensuring the full implementation of the DORIS system.

These examples illustrate how judgments evolve toward digital compliance, aiding compilations like Supreme Today lists.

Challenges in Accessing Full Databases

While Supreme Today offers robust search, users face hurdles like non-searchable PDFs or volume overload. Other cases highlight:- Telegram infringement lists submitted as PDFs. NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLCNEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC - Delhi_Delhi_CS(COMM)-282_2020 2022_DHC_3333 NEETU SINGH vs TELEGRAM FZ LLC- Equation errors in result sheets due to database fields. PARAMJEET KAUR & ANR. Vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

Courts remedy via directions for evidence-led reconstruction, applicable to judgment PDFs.

Practical Tips for Legal Researchers

In tax cases, databases like ChexSystems inform PE determinations, stressing accurate data. Assistant Director of Income Tax-I, New Delhi VS E-Funds IT Solution Inc. - 2017 7 Supreme 620

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Compiling Supreme Court judgments from Supreme Today into one PDF streamlines research, as shown by the listed cases on service law. Subimal Sarkar VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL. Courts universally prioritize digital preservation—proper preservation and storage of land records—urging systems like DORIS. Monk Estates Private Limited VS Government of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2982

Key Takeaways:- Use cited lists for quick starts; verify via official sources.- Prioritize searchable PDFs to avoid pitfalls like data loss. Tarun Kumar VS State of Jharkhand - 2020 Supreme(Jhk) 806- For employment precedents, these rulings offer consistent guidance.- Always cross-reference; technology aids but human oversight ensures accuracy.

Stay updated on legal databases for efficient practice. This overview generally illustrates approaches; professional advice is recommended.

#SupremeCourtIndia, #LegalJudgments, #SupremeToday
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top