Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Land Ownership and Rights in Nanakramguda Village - Several sources confirm that land parcels in Sy.No. 115/5, 115/6, 115/7, and surrounding survey numbers are owned and possessed by individuals such as the petitioners and other private owners. For example, the petitioners are owners and possessors of land to an extent of Ac.5.00 guntas in Survey 115/5, Ac.2.19 guntas and Ac.2.00 guntas respectively in Survey No.115/6 ["Satti Venkata Krishna Reddy vs The Collector - Telangana"], and Motilal s/o Tuljaram is the absolute owner and possessor of an agriculture land admeasuring Acres 13.30 guntas in Sy.No.111/1 and 111 ["Motilal (died) per LRs vs The District Collector - Telangana"].
Government Land Acquisition and Development Initiatives - Several documents detail government actions for land acquisition and development projects, notably for IT zones and other infrastructure. For instance, the Government of India granted letter of approval... for development and operation of the Sector specific special zone and IT-enabled services at Nanakramguda ["Satti Venkata Krishna Reddy vs The Collector - Telangana"], and the District Collector, Rangareddy District, issued orders to handover the physical possession of the Government Land to an extent of 1936 sq. yards in Sy.No.136/P of Gachibowli Village ["Asian Institute of Gastroenterology VS State of Telangana - Telangana"].
Legal Challenges and Court Proceedings - Multiple sources describe legal disputes over land rights, including petitions for maintaining status quo, allegations of illegal dispossession, and procedural violations. For example, the petitioners claim to be owners of Plot No.1-12, Nanakramguda Village, and seek to maintain status quo pending legal exercise ["Suraram Bhagyamma vs The State of Telangana - Telangana"], and action of authorities in issuing notices without issuing show cause notices is challenged as illegal and arbitrary ["Suraram Bhagyamma vs The State of Telangana - Telangana"].
Development Projects and Urban Infrastructure - Several entries reference construction proposals and urban infrastructure development, such as residential and commercial projects. For example, proposals for construction of residential building over Plot No: 515 TYPE-C, Kondapur ["S. B. Shenker Rao vs The State of Telangana - Telangana"], and the construction of commercial space in Sy.No.116, Nanakramguda ["Shaik Hidayatulla vs M/s. Sahiti Infratec Ventures India Private Limited - Telangana"].
Notable Landmarks and Administrative Details - The addresses of companies and officials involved in the land transactions are documented, including addresses at Nanakramguda Village and Gachibowli. For example, Transferor company's registered office at Qcity, Block A, 6th Floor, Sy.NO.109, 110 and 111/2, Nanakramguda village ["M/S QUINN LOGISTICS INDIA PROVATE LIMITED vs - - Telangana"], and M/s Zaggle Prepaid Ocean Services Limited at 15th Floor, Western Block, Vamsiram-Suvarna Durga Tech Park, Nanakramguda ["M/S ZAGGLE PREPAID OCEAN SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SRI AVINASH RAMESH GODKHINDI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND - Jharkhand"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The provided sources collectively establish that Nanakramguda village, particularly Survey No. 115/5, 115/6, and adjacent survey numbers, comprises land owned or possessed by private individuals and companies, with ongoing legal and governmental processes related to land acquisition, development, and urbanization. The area is subject to complex land rights, involving private ownership, government projects, and legal disputes, reflecting its significance as a hub for IT and commercial development.
In the bustling real estate landscape of Telangana, particularly in areas like Nanakramguda village under Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, inquiries about specific survey numbers are common. One frequent question arises: What are the land records or legal details for Sy No 115/29 Nanakramguda village, Serilingampally mdl Rangareddy dist? This post dives deep into available judicial documents, highlights related cases, and provides practical guidance on accessing official records. Note that this is general information based on public legal sources and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer or revenue authorities for personalized guidance.
A thorough review of key legal documents reveals no direct information on land records for Survey No. 115/29 in Nanakramguda village. The primary reference document focuses exclusively on disputes over Survey No. 83 in a nearby village, Raidurg (Panmaktha), within the same mandal and district. As stated, The provided document exclusively addresses ownership and purchase claims for Survey No. 83 in Raidurg (Panmaktha) village K. Anjana Devi VS Government of A. P. , rep. , by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department - 2007 0 Supreme(AP) 51. Key excerpts specify purchasers of small extent of land forming part of Survey No.83 of Raidurg (Panmaktha) village and land of an extent of Acs.526.07 guntas in Survey No.83 of Raidurg (Panmaktha) Village, with no mention of Nanakramguda or Survey No. 115/29 K. Anjana Devi VS Government of A. P. , rep. , by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department - 2007 0 Supreme(AP) 51.
This mismatch in survey numbers and villages means the document is irrelevant to the query. Locations differ:- Queried: Survey No. 115/29, Nanakramguda village.- Documented: Survey No. 83, Raidurg (Panmaktha) village K. Anjana Devi VS Government of A. P. , rep. , by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department - 2007 0 Supreme(AP) 51.
While the mandal (Serilingampally) and district (Ranga Reddy) align, distinct parcels show no overlap.
Although Survey No. 115/29 lacks specific references, several judicial documents discuss adjacent or related survey numbers in Nanakramguda village, offering context on common issues like ownership, possession, assignments, and prohibitions on transfers. These cases typically involve writ petitions, arbitration, and tenancy disputes, reflecting the area's active litigation history.
Notably, portions of Survey No. 115 appear in multiple cases:- Petitioners claimed ownership of Ac.5.00 guntas in Survey 115/5, Ac.2.19 guntas and Ac.2.00 guntas respectively in Survey No.115/6 situated at Nanakramguda village of Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Satti Venkata Krishna Reddy vs The Collector, - 2024 Supreme(Online)(TS) 10037Satti Venkata Krishna Reddy vs The Collector - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 29372. These involve disputes over land for technology-enabled services.- A significant case references allotments in Sy. Nos. 115/1, 115/16 to 115/21, 115/27, 115/28 and 130 of Nanakramguda village, where lands were conveyed for operations, raising questions under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977. The court noted, the 5th respondent on authorization by the 4th respondent allotted Ac.30.5 gts of land in Sy. Nos. 115/1, 115/16 to 115/21, 115/27, 115/28 and 130 and directed status quo pending fresh proceedings Dasari Narayana Rao VS The Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer - 2006 Supreme(AP) 1408.
Survey No. 115/27 and 115/28 are proximate to 115/29, suggesting potential shared history, such as assignment status or development pressures. However, no explicit link to 115/29 exists.
These cases highlight recurring themes: bona fide purchases versus assigned land restrictions, ex parte injunctions, and the need for procedural fairness Dasari Narayana Rao VS The Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer - 2006 Supreme(AP) 1408Sree Venkataraya Builders Private Limited VS Kausalya Shelters Limited rep. by its Chairman, Sri D. Ravinder Rao, S/o. Chokka Rao - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 205.
Nanakramguda's proximity to Hyderabad has fueled development, leading to litigation over:- Assigned Lands: Prohibitions under A.P. Assigned Lands Act, 1977, requiring show cause notices to specify assignment dates and rules Dasari Narayana Rao VS The Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer - 2006 Supreme(AP) 1408.- Tenancy and Succession: Rights under A.P. (T.A.) Tenancy Act, 1950, including recovery of possession Karre Narasimha VS Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District - 2013 Supreme(AP) 317.- Injunctions and Arbitration: Courts emphasize prejudice proof for ex parte orders and supervisory jurisdiction Sree Venkataraya Builders Private Limited VS Kausalya Shelters Limited rep. by its Chairman, Sri D. Ravinder Rao, S/o. Chokka Rao - 2022 Supreme(Telangana) 205Vasavi And Gp Infra VS D. Bhujalu - 2020 Supreme(Telangana) 565.
Since judicial documents provide no direct insight into Survey No. 115/29, turn to official channels:1. Dharani Portal: Telangana's digital land records platform for pahani, adangal, and revenue extracts.2. Tahsildar Office: Visit Serilingampally Mandal office for certified copies.3. High Court Searches: Use case numbers for litigation history.4. RTI Applications: Request specific survey details from revenue department.
Recommendations generally include verifying patta status, checking for prohibitions, and consulting locals before transactions.
In summary, while no high-confidence matches exist for Sy No 115/29, the area's legal landscape underscores diligence in land dealings. For tailored advice, engage a Telangana property lawyer. Stay informed via Dharani and monitor related surveys for patterns.
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
#NanakramgudaLandRecords, #TelanganaPropertyLaw, #Survey115Disputes
village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District. ... It is the case of the petitioner that one Boomaiah grand father of the petitioner was recorded as protected tenant of the land in an extent of Ac. 5-17 guntas in Sy.Nos.69 to 73 situated at Nanakramguda village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District. ... Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... … Sir, I, D.Ashok S/....
technology enabled services at Nanakramguda village. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are owners and possessors of land to an extent of Ac.5.00 guntas in Survey 115/5, Ac.2.19 guntas and Ac.2.00 guntas respectively in Survey No.115/6 situated at Nanakramguda village of Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and the ... /5 and 115/7 of Nankaramguda Village of Serilingampally#HL_END....
technology enabled services at Nanakramguda village. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are owners and possessors of land to an extent of Ac.5.00 guntas in Survey 115/5, Ac.2.19 guntas and Ac.2.00 guntas respectively in Survey No.115/6 situated at Nanakramguda village of Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and the ... 5 and 115/7 of Nankaramguda Village of Serilingampally....
Motilal s/ o Tuljaram is the absolute owner and possessor of an agriculture land admeasuring Acres 13.30 guntas in Sy.No.111/ 1 and 111 of Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District and the petitioners’ late father had been cultivating the said ... I t is also pertinent to bring on record the fact borne on record that in respect of lands situated in survey nos. 4 to 35 and 41 to 49 of Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga....
Motilal s/ o Tuljaram is the absolute owner and possessor of an agriculture land admeasuring Acres 13.30 guntas in Sy.No.111/ 1 and 111 of Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District and the petitioners’ late father had been cultivating the said ... I t is also pertinent to bring on record the fact borne on record that in respect of lands situated in survey nos. 4 to 35 and 41 to 49 of Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga....
technology enabled services at Nanakramguda village. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are owners and possessors of land to an extent of Ac.5.00 guntas in Survey 115/5, Ac.2.19 guntas and Ac.2.00 guntas respectively in Survey No.115/6 situated at Nanakramguda village of Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and the ... /5 and 115/7 of Nankaramguda Village of Serilingampally#HL_END....
J Raghupathy, S/O Saamya, Aged About 29 Occ: Field Investigator, In O/o DDG, NSSO (FOD) Hyderabad H No :-3-51, Vill: Sarlaravulapally, Mdl: Kandukur, Post: Muchrla, Dist: Rangareddy Telangana 509358 20. B. ... Venkaiah (Late), Aged About 32 Occ: Field Investigator, In O/o DDG, NSSO (FOD) Hyderabad H No.1-126 Vill:Arutla, Mdl: Manchal, Rangareddy (Dist), Telangana-501506. 18. ... D.Sunil Kumar, S/O.Devadar, Aged About 30 Occ: Field Investigator, In O/O DDG, NSSO (FOD) ....
According to the petitioner, she is the absolute owner and possessor of the open plot bearing Plot No.22, admeasuring 200 square yards in Survey No.150 (Part), situated at Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District, on the strength of a registered Gift Deed bearing document No.4306 ... Respondent No.7 has issued impugned notice dated 30.12.2024 under Section - 405 of the GHMC Act, 1955 stating that it has received a complaint of encroachment of FTL/Buffer Zone of Thoutoni Kunta and Bhagirathamma Ch....
Village Serilingampally Mandal within GHMC limits. ... Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, on instructions, would submit that the sole proprietor of respondent No.2 is the owner of Ac.0.29 guntas or 3509 square yards in Sy.No.116 of Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... According to the applicant, respondent No.2 had entered Memo of Understanding, dated 12.12.2019 with respondent No.1 for sale of open land admeasuring 3509....
Circle 20, Serilingampally Zone, Serilingampally(M), GHMC, Rangareddy (Dist). ... Circle 20, Serilingampally Zone, Serilingampally(M), GHMC, Rangareddy (Dist).. ... SHANKAR RAO submitted proposals the construction of residential building consist of 1 stilt +2 upper floors over Plot No: 515 TYPE-C, Street/Road: KONDAPUR, Locality: KONDAPUR, Survey No: 77, Kondapur(V), Serilingampally Circle 20, Serilingampally Zone,....
Petitioner claims to be the owner of land admeasuring Acs.2.08 guntas in Sy.No.144 of Nanakramguda village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Petitioner entered into Development Agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney, registered on 12.01.2015, in the Office of Joint Sub-Registrar, Ranga Reddy district for construction of complex in the above extent of land. Supplementary Agreement was entered, where under it was agreed that 60% would fall to the share of the developer and 40% to the owner.
6. The plaint schedule property which is mentioned is Ac.3.30 gts out of Ac.11.11 gts in Sy.No.88 of Nanakramguda, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District within the specified boundaries.
They filed petition before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Saroornagar mandal, Rangareddy District under Section 40 of Act for grant of succession of tenancy rights and under Sections 32 (1) of the Act for recovery of possession. By proceedings No.B/10773/2003 dated 27.9.2003, the Mandal Revenue Officer, ordered succession and recovery of possession. (for short ‘the Act’) for an extent of Acs.17-22 gts. in Sy.No.22 of Mallapur village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangareddy District.
According to the 6th respondent, the 5th respondent on authorization by the 4th respondent allotted Ac.30.5 gts of land in Sy. Nos. 115/1, 115/16 to 115/21, 115/27, 115/28 and 130 of Nanakramguda village to it for its operations. Respondent No.4 is stated to have executed a conveyance deed dated 25.6.2004 confirming conveyance in favour of the 6th respondent. If by the end of the aforesaid period, the current de jure entitlement of the petitioners to possession and enjoyment of the property is not disturbed by any formal order passed by due proceedings under the 1977 Act, t....
The opposite party has not changed the items as per the convenience and Item No. 10 was described as stocks (finished goods) instead of depot (finished goods) as described by the complainant. The complainant never brought it to the notice of the opposite party at any time prior to the occurrence of the event about the situation of finished goods at different places. A perusal of the fire policy issued also clearly demonstrated that the property insured was situated at Sy. 182, Yellampet village, Medchal Mandal, Rangareddy Dist. only. The proposal statement dated 26.11.1999 ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
